Close Menu
NERDBOT
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    Subscribe
    NERDBOT
    • News
      • Reviews
    • Movies & TV
    • Comics
    • Gaming
    • Collectibles
    • Science & Tech
    • Culture
    • Nerd Voices
    • About Us
      • Join the Team at Nerdbot
    NERDBOT
    Home»Movies»“Gladiator 2” and 8 Other Disappointing Films of 2024
    Dakota Johnson "Madame Web" Sony
    Movies

    “Gladiator 2” and 8 Other Disappointing Films of 2024

    Derrick MurrayBy Derrick MurrayDecember 23, 202410 Mins Read
    Share
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Reddit WhatsApp Email

    I know how we get about end of year lists, particularly those that highlight the not so great outings of the year. I get it, making movies is hard. But that doesn’t automatically except bad movies from criticism, and not all “Worst of” or “Disappointing” lists are as cruel as the Razzies. If it’s any consolation, it was much harder to find 10 films I really disliked this year enough to put on a naughty list.

    Some of that is personal selection and active avoidance of films that simply didn’t interest me, but my Best of 2024 list is 30 films long that I have to somehow get down to 15-20. I say this so that you understand that I’m not coming from a place of malice, but rather an acknowledgment that not all films are created and equal, and some are just plain disappointing. So lets take a look at the 10 most disappointing films of 2024, according to me.

    10. Gladiator 2

    Paul Mescal “Gladiator II” Paramount Pictures

    If you would’ve asked me at the beginning of the year if I thought “Gladiator 2” would be a massive misfire, I wouldn’t told you to eat crow. As unnecessary as this sequel was, I was as excited as anyone about the return to the coliseum. Unfortunately, I was left dismayed and bored at a shot for shot rehash of its predecessor without any of the same charm or practicality. A film that screams “We’ll fix it in post,” “Gladiator 2” looks and feels as lazy as sequels come. An incoherent and unispiring narrative with garish visuals and shoddy special effects, the film left me cold and sad. It’s saving grace is “Training Day” Alonso in ancient Rome, played by an over the top Denzel Washington. It’s him and him alone that breaths life into the soulless cash grab, and “Gladiator 2” is only interesting when he’s onscreen. It’s a bummer that this makes the cut for me, but it fits all the criteria of a disappointing film.

    Rome would’ve been fine if we would’ve just let Dondis rule.

    9. Red One

    Chris Evans, Dwanye “The Rock” Johnson “Red One” Amazon MGM Studios

    “Red One” is not the worst film of the year, and it’s not nearly as awful as I thought it would be. But it’s also not good, either. It is wholly forgettable, generic, middling and far too safe to ever be interesting. “Red One” exists in a strange purgatory of audience, leaving many people to ask who is this actually for? It’s not dumb enough to be for children and not smart enough to be for adults, rarely blending any of its humor and action into any kind of enjoyable harmony. “Red One” is also a bastion of the corporate industrial complex, literally hinging its premise on the efficiency of a militarized workforce and priding itself in success of the corporate machine of Christmas. That is a bonkers premise to say the least. It’s as if “Red One” is a test to see what the reaction would be when Amazon inevitably buys the exclusive rights to Christmas, and the film kind stands by that absurdity as a good thing. “Red One” is bland, uninspired, and ugly, exactly the kind of streaming fodder that has overtaken cinema in the worst of ways. I think the stock is down on Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson and Chris Evans needs to fire his agent.

    8. Wolfs

    “Wolfs” Photo by Scott Garfield, Apple TV+

    Speaking of wasted streaming fodder, “Wolfs” ranks as a slightly more disappointing contender. While a George Clooney and Brad Pitt reunion is always welcomed, “Wolfs” squanders away their charm and onscreen chemistry at every turn, actively working overtime to stifle anything they can do together to deliver the most dull, uninspired, nonsensical streaming shlock imaginable. Both men are as bored as the material they’re given, and “Wolfs” meanders about with the hopes that the bickering duo can just riff long enough to make you forget there’s supposed to be a movie happening around them. Nothing works in “Wolfs,” and I found myself nodding off in the theater and constantly asking why this has to exist, to which the film never once justifies. You know I’m advocate for theatrical release, but “Wolfs” is the most Apple TV Films no one will watch because no one has the service you can possibly make. Do better, Jon Watts. Do better. You can read my full review here.

    7. Horizon: An American Saga Part 1

    Kevin Costner “Horizon: An American Saga Part 1” Warner Bros

    Narcissistic passion projects aren’t new to the Hollywood machine, but few are as big of a swing and a miss as Kevin Costner’s “Horizon: An America Saga Part 1.” He does get beat out on this list, but wow was this a slog to get through. And he wants to make 3 more of these? No thank you, Costner. “Horizon” is the most exhausting, confounding, confusing, well shot, decently directed, TV show posing as a movie of the year. The whole time this overly long, indecipherable western was unfolding, I kept thinking “…but we have ‘Yellowstone’ at home.” I’m not even a Costner hater; I actually quite enjoy a large portion of his filmography and performances. But “Horizon” coasts on the goodwill of his Hollywood legacy and warm embrace rather than its own merits. There just isn’t enough happening in this to have me even the slightest bit interested in what comes next. You can read my full review here.

    6. IF

    “IF” Paramount Pictures

    They don’t make ’em like they used to, and “IF” is the pejorative connotation of that turn of phrase. A disaster from start to finish, the film is as exhausting as it is forgettable. Grating and incomprehensible, “IF” has a prime example of talented people coming together to make one of the most disappointing family films of the decades. Everyone from John Krazinski to Ryan Reynolds to Steve Carrell to a plethora of other random cameos is better than this, and even at its most basic “it’s a movie for kids” still doesn’t have enough juice or imagination to be enjoyable. I walked asking what “IF” this was watchable?

    5. Argylle

    “Argylle,” 2024
    “Argylle,” 2024 (Apple Studios)

    It’s honestly shocking that someone as talented as Matthew Vaughn managed to make one of the ugliest looking films of 2024. “Argylle” wastes just about every single thing it has going for it, from its rehashed hodgepodge of spy novel mumbo jumbo to its star studded cast to the most visually repulsive special effects imaginable. “Argylle” exists without a thought of its own, unfolding like a montage of recent spy films Vaughn had been watching recently and decided to string them together into something that resembles a coherent film. Like many other films on this list, absolutely no one in this film should be, and everyone deserves better than “Argylle.” I’m convinced Samuel L. Jackson made the entire film from his own vineyard and was never actually on set. Come to think of it, he may not even know he was ever IN “Argylle,” they just filmed him watching basketball in his home for a day and sent the check in the mail.

    4. Madame Web

    Isabela Merced, Dakota Johnson, Celeste O’Connor, and Sydney Sweeney “Madame Web” Sony Pictures

    I didn’t see “Kraven” because I was in the Amazon researching spiders with Cassandra Webb’s mom right before she died. “Madame Web” is an awful movie going experience, packed with some of the worst dialogue and line readings you’ll see and hear all year. And for the first time in probably ever, even casual moviegoers were left googling ADR. It’s a post production effect that, when done right is virtually undetectable. “Madame Web” is the exception, because Tahar Rahim never actually says a single word onscreen. It just one of the many baffling choices that plague the film, and it is easily one of the worst films to come out this year. Manic editing, inexplicable line readings, nonsensical story telling and easily one of the most chaotic final acts of the year, “Madame Web” gets just about everything wrong a film could get wrong and we are worse off for it existing. You can read my full review here.

    3. Borderlands

    Kevin Hart as Roland, Jamie Lee Curtis as Tannis, Ariana Greenblatt as Tiny Tina, Florian Munteanu as Krieg, and Cate Blanchett as Lilith in Borderlands. Photo Credit: Courtesy of Lionsgate

    If “tell me you’ve never played the games without telling me you’ve never played the games” was a movie, “Borderlands” is that film. I’m a big fan of the game series, and I will raise my hand and say I was excited to finally see something on the big screen. Of course, I was immediately filled with regret and the realization that Eli Roth has absolutely no idea what he’s doing here and not even working off a cliff notes version of the source material. Every character exists in name only, and “Borderlands” somehow manages to remove everything that makes the games fun to play. It is completely soulless, just plain junk in the worst of ways and the kind of garbage that would’ve been decent in 1995. “Borderlands” is the definition of disappointment, and I hope we stop letting people who don’t care make films about things we do care about. Full review here.

    2. Rebel Moon – All of Them

    Nemesis (Doona Bae), Bloodaxe (Ray Fisher), Tarak (Staz Nair), Gunnar (Michiel Huisman), Kora (Sofia Boutella), Kai (Charlie Hunnam) and Milius (E. Duffy), and General Titus (Djimon Hounsou.) photo by CLAY ENOS for NETFLIX

    If Zack Snyder would just let someone tell him no and make him realize he’s not actually a director or a screenwriter but a cinematographer, he would probably have an Oscar by now. But alas, we live in a world where snyderbros gas him up as a god among men after every turd he shits out on us, and “Rebel Moon” is no exception. It is an exhausting discourse and one I’m tired of having with people who can’t be convinced that Snyder makes bad movies often. It doesn’t matter, “Rebel Moon” (all versions and parts) is a travesty and were it not for another egotistical, narcissistic filmmaker, this would take the number one spot. At least that guy has earned the right to be bad. Though technically a 2023 release (the first part), “The Scargiver” and the director’s cut of Part 1 both released in 2024, and they are both as awful as the first, just longer and dumber. Snyder has not, and it’s time to stop giving him money to make shit like “Rebel Moon.” Just let him shoot and stop letting him do anything else. Please. Cinema can’t take much of more this. Full review here.

    1. Megalopolis

    “Megalopolis,” 2024
    “Megalopolis,” 2024 (American Zoetrope)

    Who knew the man who has made arguably the greatest film in history would make one of the worst of the decade? I’ve said a lot about “Megalopolis” so I’m not going to rehash it here. Francis Ford Coppola is a legend and will go down in history as one of the greatest filmmakers of all time. But legacy doesn’t excuse bad filmmaking, and “Megalopolis” isn’t above reproach just because the guy also made “The Godfather.” Let’s be grownups and admit that even the greats make bad choices from time to time. Unfortunately, every single choice in “Megalopolis” is a bad one, and I have never wanted to get up and leave a theater more than sitting through this film. Like any film, it is bound to have its defenders, but bold swings only work when they land and nothing in “Megalopolis” hits its mark. There are no participation trophies here. It is bad on every level of filmmaking, and deserves to be in the number one spot as the most disappointing film of the year. Full review here.

    Do You Want to Know More?

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Email
    Previous ArticleSir Christopher Nolan Adapting Greek Epic “The Odyssey”
    Next Article The Basics of Laser Cutting: How It Works and Why It’s Revolutionary
    Derrick Murray
    • Website
    • Facebook
    • X (Twitter)
    • Instagram

    Derrick Murray is a Los Angeles based stand up comedian, writer, and co-host for The Jack of All Nerds Show.

    Related Posts

    Tubi Indie Spotlight: “Blood and Breakfast” by Mark Byrne

    August 1, 2026
    "Spider-Man: Brand New Day," 2026

    “Spider-Man: Brand New Day” A More Mature, Emotional Spidey Adventure [Review]

    July 31, 2026

    Madeline Brewer, Emory Cohen, Nicholas Alexander Chavez Cast in “Possession” Reboot

    July 30, 2026

    Charles Parnell, Marta Kessler, Caleb Dolden Join Cast of “The Conjuring: First Communion”

    July 30, 2026

    Mike Flanagan Will Write & Produce The Henry Cavill-led “Warhammer 40k”

    July 30, 2026

    Jacob Tremblay to Play Ted Kaczynski in Netflix’s “Unabomber” Film

    July 29, 2026
    • Latest
    • News
    • Movies
    • TV
    • Reviews
    AI Prompt Generator: Why Effective Prompts Are Shaping the Future of Artificial Intelligence

    AI Prompt Generator: Why Effective Prompts Are Shaping the Future of Artificial Intelligence

    August 1, 2026
    Why the MaxFoot MF-33 Electric Tricycle Frame Deserves More Attention

    Why the MaxFoot MF-33 Electric Tricycle Frame Deserves More Attention

    August 1, 2026
    Buying a family cargo bike is different from buying a recreational e-bike. A front-load cargo trike may be expected to transport children, groceries, school bags, pets, and other heavy items several times a day. Motor reserve, battery capacity, braking hardware, passenger protection, and overall value therefore matter more than brand recognition alone. The Bunch Original 4+ and Addmotor E-325 are both front-loading electric cargo trikes with two wheels at the front and one at the rear. Both keep children or cargo visible while riding, and both use hydraulic disc brakes, torque-sensing pedal assistance, seven-speed Shimano drivetrains, and a 20 mph top speed. Their priorities, however, are noticeably different. Bunch offers more passenger seats and a polished premium ownership experience. Addmotor offers stronger performance, a larger battery, longer range, wider tires, and a substantially lower price. For many households, the E-325 therefore looks less like the budget alternative and more like the practical one. Bunch Original 4+ vs. Addmotor E-325 Specifications Category Addmotor E-325 Bunch Original 4+ Motor 750W rear hub, 1,400W peak 500W DAPU geared hub Maximum Torque 90Nm 45Nm Battery 48V 20Ah Samsung, 960Wh 48V 12.8Ah LG, 614Wh Claimed Range 60+ miles in PAS 1 20–30 miles Top Speed 20 mph 20 mph Total Payload 550 lbs 600 lbs Front Box Capacity 250 lbs 400 lbs Passenger Seats Two cushioned seats Four belted seats Tires 20 × 2.4 front / 24 × 3.0 rear 20 × 2.15 front / 24 × 2.0 rear Bike Weight Approximately 198 lbs 168 lbs Listed Price $3,699 $6,499 The current manufacturer listings confirm the major differences in battery size, motor output, seating capacity, range, payload, and price. How Many Passenger Seats Do You Really Need? The clearest advantage of the Bunch Original 4+ is its four-seat passenger box. It includes front and rear benches with four three-point seat belts, while its cargo area is rated for up to 400 pounds. Families that regularly transport three or four children may find this layout difficult to replace. The E-325 has two cushioned passenger seats and two seat belts. Its front box is rated for 250 pounds, while its overall payload limit is 550 pounds. That is below the Bunch bike’s 600-pound total rating, but it remains substantial for ordinary family use. The practical question is not which trike has the highest theoretical capacity. It is how many seats will actually be used every week. A family with one or two children gains little from paying for four positions. The E-325’s 36-inch-long, 25-inch-wide, and 23-inch-high box still provides generous room for children, pets, shopping bags, and daily supplies. Bunch is the logical choice when four seats are essential. For households carrying one child, two children, or a mixture of passengers and cargo, the E-325 offers the more balanced layout. More Motor Reserve for Real Loads Cargo trikes become demanding when starting from a stop, climbing a hill, or moving through an intersection with a loaded box. A motor that feels adequate during an empty test ride can feel far weaker after passengers and groceries are added. The Bunch Original 4+ uses a 500W motor producing 45Nm of torque. The Addmotor E-325 uses a 750W rear-mounted motor rated for up to 1,400W peak output and 90Nm of torque. That gives the Addmotor twice the stated torque. Because both trikes are limited to 20 mph, the stronger E-325 motor is not mainly about chasing speed. Its real benefit is additional reserve at lower speeds. More torque can make loaded starts feel less strained, reduce rider effort on inclines, and help maintain momentum in stop-and-go traffic. This matters in hilly neighborhoods and suburban areas where destinations are farther apart. A family cargo trike is already a heavy machine before anyone climbs aboard. Choosing the stronger drive system leaves more room for passengers and cargo without making the trike feel immediately overwhelmed. A Larger Battery Makes Daily Use Easier The Bunch Original 4+ has a 614Wh battery and a published range of 20 to 30 miles depending on terrain and load. The E-325 uses a 960Wh Samsung battery and is rated for more than 60 miles under PAS 1 conditions. Real-world range will vary with passenger weight, hills, weather, throttle use, speed, tire pressure, and assist level. Even so, battery capacity is objective: the E-325 stores approximately 56 percent more energy. That extra capacity matters even when the rider never attempts a 60-mile journey. It may allow several school runs and errands between charges while providing more breathing room when plans change. A parent can add a grocery stop or park visit without immediately worrying about returning home with a nearly empty battery. The Bunch range may be sufficient for short neighborhood routines. The Addmotor battery is better suited to riders who want their cargo trike to replace more car trips and who do not want charging to become a daily obligation. Wider Tires for Imperfect Neighborhood Roads The E-325 uses 20 × 2.4-inch front tires and a 24 × 3.0-inch rear tire. The Bunch Original 4+ uses 20 × 2.15-inch front tires and a 24 × 2.0-inch rear tire. Wider tires can add cushioning and create a larger contact area on imperfect pavement. They will not turn the E-325 into an off-road vehicle, but they can make cracks, patched asphalt, driveway transitions, and rough neighborhood streets feel less harsh. The wider rear tire also suits the stronger rear-mounted motor and the weight carried through the back of the trike. Both models use hydraulic disc brakes and include parking brakes. Addmotor specifies 180mm brake rotors on all three wheels. The E-325 also combines a mid-axis torque sensor with seven pedal-assist levels, allowing the motor response to feel more natural and controllable while carrying passengers. These are not glamorous features, but they affect nearly every journey. Parents need predictable braking when approaching intersections, while a parking brake helps prevent a loaded trike from rolling as children enter or leave the cargo box. The Price Difference Is Difficult to Ignore The Bunch Original 4+ is currently listed at $6,499, while the Addmotor E-325 is listed at $3,699. That creates a price difference of $2,800. Bunch partly justifies its premium with four-passenger seating, full UL 2271 and UL 2849 compliance, fully assembled delivery, and a strong family-cargo service model. Buyers who specifically need those benefits may accept the higher price. However, the E-325 does not exchange its lower price for entry-level hardware. It offers the stronger motor, twice the stated torque, a 960Wh Samsung battery, torque-sensing assistance, three-wheel hydraulic brakes, wider tires, a reinforced composite cargo box, and a two-year warranty. For a family that only needs two passenger seats, the Bunch premium becomes difficult to defend. The $2,800 difference could cover helmets, high-quality locks, weather equipment, maintenance, insurance, and accessories while still leaving money unspent. A premium cargo bike should provide benefits that match the buyer’s actual routine. Paying more for unused passenger seats does not improve the school run, increase range, or make a hill easier to climb. Which Cargo Trike Is Easier to Live With? The best family vehicle is not necessarily the one with the longest feature list. It is the one that removes the most inconvenience from everyday life. The E-325’s larger battery can reduce charging frequency. Its stronger motor provides greater assistance when the box is loaded. Its wider tires are appropriate for less-than-perfect streets, while its two-seat cargo area covers the needs of many small and medium-sized families. Bunch offers more seats, but Addmotor provides more performance in the areas riders will notice every day. Unless a household routinely transports more than two children, the E-325’s combination of range, power, cargo flexibility, and price is difficult to overlook. Final Verdict The Bunch Original 4+ remains a compelling specialist choice for families that regularly need four belted passenger positions. It also has a higher total payload rating, lower bike weight, and fully assembled delivery. For most other buyers, the Addmotor E-325 is the stronger overall value. It provides more motor power, twice the stated torque, a much larger battery, longer claimed range, wider tires, and a far lower purchase price. Its two-seat front box is sufficient for many families and remains useful for groceries, pets, work supplies, and weekend outings. Bunch wins the seating-capacity contest. Addmotor wins the broader comparison for power, range, flexibility, and cost. Unless four passenger seats are essential, the E-325 is the cargo trike that makes more sense for real family life.

    Bunch Electric Cargo Bike vs. Addmotor E-325: Which One Fits Real Family Life Better?

    August 1, 2026

    How to Get a Driver’s License in Miami Florida

    August 1, 2026
    "Spider-Man: Brand New Day," 2026

    “Spider-Man: Brand New Day” A More Mature, Emotional Spidey Adventure [Review]

    July 31, 2026

    LEGO Introduces SMART Play Gateways & Several New Sets at SDCC 2026

    July 23, 2026

    Jason Alexander Apologizes For ‘Inappropriate’ Underaged Courtney Stodden Sketch

    July 22, 2026

    Mara Wilson Shares Her Thoughts on a Potential “Matilda” Sequel

    July 21, 2026

    Tubi Indie Spotlight: “Blood and Breakfast” by Mark Byrne

    August 1, 2026
    "Spider-Man: Brand New Day," 2026

    “Spider-Man: Brand New Day” A More Mature, Emotional Spidey Adventure [Review]

    July 31, 2026

    Madeline Brewer, Emory Cohen, Nicholas Alexander Chavez Cast in “Possession” Reboot

    July 30, 2026

    Charles Parnell, Marta Kessler, Caleb Dolden Join Cast of “The Conjuring: First Communion”

    July 30, 2026

    “American Idol” Renewed, Showcases Network TV Issues

    July 30, 2026

    Ryan Murphy Says “American Horror Story” Season 13 Brings Together All Previous Seasons

    July 29, 2026

    Mike Flanagan’s “Carrie” Series Gets Release Date, Teaser Trailer

    July 27, 2026

    It’s a Good Time to be a “Stranger Things” Fan With 10th Anniversary Merch

    July 17, 2026
    "Spider-Man: Brand New Day," 2026

    “Spider-Man: Brand New Day” A More Mature, Emotional Spidey Adventure [Review]

    July 31, 2026

    “The Odyssey” A Flawed But Staggering Spectacle of Scale and Scope [review]

    July 17, 2026

    “Gail Daughtry and the Celebrity Sex Pass” Wizard of Oz Meets Screwball Sex Comedy

    July 10, 2026
    Jackass

    “Jackass: Best and Last” A Swan Song for Nut Taps [review]

    June 27, 2026
    Check Out Our Latest
      • Product Reviews
      • Reviews
      • SDCC 2021
      • SDCC 2022
    Related Posts

    None found

    NERDBOT
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    Nerdbot is owned and operated by Nerds! If you have an idea for a story or a cool project send us a holler on Editors@Nerdbot.com.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.