Close Menu
NERDBOT
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    Subscribe
    NERDBOT
    • News
      • Reviews
    • Movies & TV
    • Comics
    • Gaming
    • Collectibles
    • Science & Tech
    • Culture
    • Nerd Voices
    • About Us
      • Join the Team at Nerdbot
    NERDBOT
    Home»News»Review»“The Flash” Episode 150, ‘Heart of the Matter Part 1’ [Recap, Review]
    Review

    “The Flash” Episode 150, ‘Heart of the Matter Part 1’ [Recap, Review]

    Colin K BassBy Colin K BassJuly 20, 20215 Mins Read
    Share
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Reddit WhatsApp Email


    “The Flash’s” 150th episode is here! Appropriately titled “Heart of the Matter Part 1,” because we are focusing on Godspeed AKA August Heart and the Godspeed War. So let’s dive into the review/recap for “The Flash’s” 150th episode.

    For those of you who have watched The CW’s “The Flash” since the beginning, I think a fairly common criticism is that the show has slowly gotten worse and worse. Aside from some epic crossovers, I can honestly say that I haven’t REALLY enjoyed “The Flash” since season 1. Here’s to hoping for the best, but expecting the worst.

    With that being said, I do check in from time to time. Whenever there’s a character from the comics, a crossover, or some monumental moment in the show’s legacy. Episode 150 is one of those moments that I couldn’t miss.

    Despite the awful photoshop on Impulse’s announcement photo, I was still excited to see a live action Impulse. The last time we saw one was back in “Smallville!” (Another favorite of mine)

    Anyways! Episode 150 starts out with a brother/sister team up against August Heart/Godspeed (Karan Oberoi). Nora West-Allen/XS (Jessica Parker Kennedy) and Bart West-Allen/Impulse (Jordan Fisher) have great chemistry and show that they’ve been trained by their father and that they still have access to Gideon. Bart’s suit looks great and the graphics stay consistent during this scene. Although I think the VFX have gone downhill.

    The West-Allens go back to Barry’s time and it’s a reunion of sorts. First time for Team Flash, but the siblings know everyone! They’re very charming and we all wish they could stay. Thanks to the Godspeed clones charging themselves in the speedforce; we get to have XS and Impulse stay with us in the present.

    Jordan Fisher as Bart/Impulse. Photo: Bettina Strauss / The CW

    The West-Allen family unites and speeds over to stop more Godspeed clones. But oddly enough, the clones were all fighting each other. The speedster family splits up, the Godspeeds only go after Impulse, then disappear into the speedforce before anything bad can happen.

    When the family gets back, Barry forces his future kids to tell him why the Godspeeds only went after Impulse. It turns out that in the CWverse, Godspeed is Impulse’s arch nemesis. He compares him to Barry’s Thawne…Barry doesn’t like that. And Impulse doesn’t like that Barry doesn’t like that…or something. Impulse throws a fit and speeds away to train with XS.

    Iris pops out of the “Still Force” and checks in with Barry. I’m honestly not sure what’s going on there but it didn’t grab me. I didn’t really care about where she was or why she popped out in a green energy burst. THEN! Jay Garrick (John Wesley Shipp) and his wife (Michelle Harrison) pop up outta nowhere. He has his speed back and he’s lookin’ good. As he goes to speed over and help Barry, a bunch of Godspeeds come out and grab him.

    XS and Impulse are training in the speed lab when all of a sudden, Barry and Iris come out and they have a family pow wow about Godspeed and how he’s not allowed in the field.

    Another failed Godspeed battle later, the West-Allen family is arguing again. Anyone noticing a pattern?

    Impulse charges into another trap…very impulsively. He thinks he’s saving Jay, but it’s all a big set up by the Godspeed clones. Barry and XS rush over to save him and roll up on him getting blasted by one of the clones. Everyone stares for a while…

    XS runs the other Godspeeds away, Barry phases through the main Godspeed and saves Impulse. Jay gets up, he’s fine? Then the 4 speedsters all stand together to face off against the clones. Out of nowhere, Cisco shows up and freezes them all with some tech device. Impulse isn’t waking up. I’m sorry, but that was such a lackluster scene. Here’s hoping for a big final scene!




    Team Flash comes up with a plan to put Barry into August Heart’s (Godspeed) mind. I don’t really know what’s going on here, but it’s the classic technology-solves-problems technique they’ve done since season 1.

    Barry is in August’s mind and it’s creepy. He begins speaking to August while he’s wearing his Godspeed suit. Godspeed ends the episode with… “You have questions? I have all the answers. This is going to be so much fun.” In a creepy voice. THEN!

    To be continued…

    Ok, review time! I have been out of “The Flash” game for a while now. But this episode was fine. I wasn’t amazed by anything, but it was cool seeing Impulse make his debut and make references to his cartoon/comic counter part.

    Barry and Iris going full parent mode was fun to see too. They’re going to be fully prepared for when little Nora eventually pops out into the world!

    The side story lines in “The Flash” never really grabbed me and they still don’t. From earlier seasons with Killer Frost to side quests with Cisco, I’ve always just wanted to focus on what Barry was up to! So I guess I’m just curious as to what Godspeed wants other than to be the fastest or whatever every other speedster wants.

    I’ll give this episode 6 stars out of 10. Mostly because we got 5 speedsters and the return of Cisco. But I gotta say, it just does not draw me in like seasons 1-3 used to. Back in the good old days when even the “Freak a week” formula was fun and those last minute cliffhangers kept you wanting more.

    Here’s hoping for a “crash” part 2!

    All good things are worth fighting for. The season finale of #TheFlash airs tonight at 8/7c. Stream free tomorrow only on The CW. pic.twitter.com/wtAqQOjvsh

    — The Flash (@CW_TheFlash) July 20, 2021

    Do You Want to Know More?

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Email
    Previous ArticleFisherman Catches then Releases Rare Blue Lobster
    Next Article “Grease” Prequel Series “Rise of the Pink Ladies” Coming to Paramount+
    Colin K Bass

    Related Posts

    Witch Hat Atelier English Dub Release Date Announced by Crunchyroll

    March 26, 2026

    Opinion: The New Harry Potter Trailer is Fine – Nothing More, Nothing Less

    March 25, 2026

    “They Will Kill You” A Violent, Blood-Splattering Good Time [review]

    March 24, 2026

    Nicholas Brendon, Xander from Buffy, Passes Away

    March 20, 2026
    "SpongeBob Squarepants"

    A Paramount WB Merger May be Trouble for Netflix Kids’ Programming

    March 19, 2026

    New Details Emerge About Failure of Buffy Revival

    March 19, 2026
    • Latest
    • News
    • Movies
    • TV
    • Reviews
    "Life of a Showgirl," 2025

    Taylor Swift Sued Over Trademark For “The Life of a Showgirl”

    March 30, 2026
    What Goes Into SaaS Video Production And Why It's Different From Regular Video

    What Goes Into SaaS Video Production And Why It’s Different From Regular Video

    March 30, 2026
    Most studios searching for a match-3 level design company are looking for five different things. Some need levels built from scratch, others require a live game rebalanced before churn compounds, and some demand a content pipeline that won't fall behind. These are different problems, and they map to multiple types of companies. The mistake most studios make is treating "match-3 level design" as a single service category and evaluating every company against the same criteria. A specialist who excels at diagnosing retention problems in live games is the wrong hire for a studio that needs 300 levels built in 2 months. A full-cycle agency that builds from concept to launch isn't the right call for a publisher who already has engineering and art in place and just needs the level design layer covered. This guide maps 7 companies for match-3 level design services to the specific problem each one is built to solve. Find your problem first. The right company follows from there. What Match-3 Level Design Services Cover The term "level design" gets used loosely in this market, and this causes bad hires. A studio that excels at building levels from scratch operates dissimilarly from one that diagnoses why a live game's difficulty curve is losing players (even if both describe their service the same way on a website). Match-3 level design breaks into four distinct services, each requiring different expertise, different tooling, and a different type of partner. Level production — designing and building playable levels configured to a game's mechanics, obstacle set, and difficulty targets. This is what most studios mean when they say they need a level design partner, and it's the service with the widest range of quality in the market. Difficulty balancing and rebalancing — using win rates, attempt counts, and churn data to calibrate difficulty across hundreds of levels. Plus, this includes adjusting live content when the data shows a problem. Studios that only do level production typically don't offer this. Studios that do it well treat it as a standalone service. Live-ops level design covers the ongoing content pipeline a live match-3 game requires after launch (seasonal events, new level batches, limited-time challenges) sustained at volume and consistent in quality. This is a throughput and process problem as much as a design problem. Full-cycle development bundles level design inside a complete production engagement: mechanics, art, engineering, monetization, QA, and launch. Level design is one function among many. Depth varies by studio. Knowing which service you need before you evaluate a single company cuts the list in half and prevents the most common mistake in this market: hiring a full-cycle agency to solve a level design problem, or hiring a specialist to build a product from scratch. The List of Companies for Match-3 Level Design Services The companies below were selected based on verified credentials, named shipped titles where available, and the specific service each one is built to deliver. They are ranked by how well their capabilities match the service types outlined above. A specialist who does one thing exceptionally well sits above a generalist who does many things adequately. SolarSpark | Pure-play match-3 level design specialist SolarSpark is a remote-first studio built exclusively around casual puzzle game production. With 7+ years in the genre and 2,000+ levels shipped across live titles including Monopoly Match, Matchland, and KitchenMasters, it is the only company on this list that does nothing but match-3 level design. Level design services: Level production, difficulty curve planning, fail-rate balancing, obstacle and booster logic design, live-ops pipeline, competitor benchmarking, product audit and retention diagnostic. Verdict: The strongest pure specialist on this list. When level design is the specific constraint, SolarSpark is the right choice. What they do well: Every level is built around difficulty curves, fail/win balance, obstacle sequencing, and booster logic, measured against targets before delivery. Competitor benchmarking is available as a standalone service, mapping your game's difficulty curve and monetization structure against current top performers with specific, actionable output. Where they fit: Studios with a live or in-development game that need a dedicated level design pipeline, a retention diagnostic, or a one-off audit before soft launch. Honest caveat: SolarSpark does not handle art, engineering, or full-cycle development. Logic Simplified | Unity-first development with analytics and monetization built in Logic Simplified specializes in Unity-powered casual and puzzle games, with match-3 explicitly in their service portfolio. Operating for over a decade with clients across multiple countries, the studio positions itself around data-informed development: analytics, A/B testing, and monetization are integrated into the production process. Level design services: Level production, difficulty progression design, obstacle and blocker placement, booster and power-up integration, A/B tested level balancing, customer journey mapping applied to level flow. Verdict: A credible full-cycle option for studios that want analytics and monetization treated as design inputs from day one, not as post-launch additions. What they do well: Logic Simplified builds analytics and player behavior tracking into the design process. Their Unity expertise is deep, and their stated MVP timeline of approximately three months is competitive at their price point. India-based rates make full-cycle development accessible without requiring a Western agency budget. Where they fit: Studios building a first match-3 title that needs the full production chain handled by a single vendor, with analytics built in from the start. Honest caveat: No publicly named match-3 titles with verifiable App Store links appear in their portfolio. Ask for specific live game references and retention data during the first conversation before committing. Cubix | US-based full-cycle match-3 development with fixed-cost engagement Cubix is a California-based game development company with a dedicated match-3 service line covering level design, tile behavior, booster systems, obstacles, UI/UX, and full production on Unity and Unreal Engine. 30+ in-house animators can cover the full scope of puzzle game production. Level design services: Level production, combo and difficulty balancing, blocker and locked tile placement, move-limit challenge design, booster and power-up integration, scoring system design. Verdict: A viable full-cycle option for studios that need a Western-based partner with transparent fixed-cost pricing and documented match-3 capability. What they do well: Cubix covers the full production chain in one engagement, with strong visual production backed by an in-house animation team. Their fixed-cost model is a practical differentiator for studios that have been burned by scope creep on previous outsourcing contracts. Staff augmentation is also available for studios that need talent to plug into an existing pipeline. Where they fit: Studios that want a US-based full-cycle partner with predictable budgets, cross-platform delivery across iOS, Android, browsers, and PC, and a single vendor to own the concept through launch. Honest caveat: Named shipped match-3 titles are not prominently listed in their public portfolio. This is a verification gap worth closing during vetting, not a disqualifier on its own. Galaxy4Games | Data-driven match-3 development with published retention case studies Galaxy4Games is a game development studio with 15+ years of operating history, building mobile and cross-platform games across casual, RPG, and arcade genres. Match-3 is a named service line. What distinguishes them from most studios on this list is a level of public transparency about retention data. Their case studies document real D1 and D7 numbers from shipped titles. Level design services: Level production, difficulty curve development, booster and obstacle design, progression system design, LiveOps level content, A/B testing integration, analytics-based balancing. Verdict: The most transparent full-cycle option in terms of real retention data. For studios that want to see numbers before they hire, Galaxy4Games offers evidence most studios keep private. What they do well: Their Puzzle Fight case study documents D1 retention growing to 30% through iteration. Their modular system reduces development time and costs through reusable components, and their LiveOps infrastructure covers analytics, event management, and content updates as a planned post-launch function. Where they fit: Studios that need a data-informed full-cycle match-3 partner and want to evaluate a studio's methodology through published results. Honest caveat: Galaxy4Games covers a broad genre range (casual, RPG, arcade, educational, and Web3), which means match-3 is one of several service lines rather than a primary focus. Zatun | Award-winning level design and production studio with 18 years of operating history Zatun is an indie game studio and work-for-hire partner operating since 2007, with game level design listed as a dedicated named service alongside full-cycle development, art production, and co-development. With 250+ game titles and 300+ clients across AAA studios and indie teams, this agency has one of the longest track records. Level design services: Level production, difficulty progression design, level pacing and goal mapping, game design documentation, Unity level design, Unreal level design, level concept art. Verdict: A reliable, experienced production partner with a long track record and genuine level design depth. What they do well: Zatun's level design service covers difficulty progression, pacing maps, goal documentation, and execution in Unity and Unreal. Their 18 years of operation across 250+ titles gives them a reference library of what works across genres. Their work-for-hire model means they can step in at specific production stages without requiring ownership of the full project. Where they fit: Studios that need a specific level design or art production function covered without a full project handoff. This can be useful for teams mid-production that need additional capacity on a defined scope. Honest caveat: No publicly named match-3 titles appear in Zatun's portfolio, their verified work spans AAA and strategy genres; match-3 specific experience should be confirmed directly before engaging. Gamecrio | Full-cycle mobile match-3 development with AI-driven difficulty adaptation Gamecrio is a mobile game development studio with offices in India and the UK, covering match-3 development as an explicit service line alongside VR, arcade, casino, and web-based game development. Their stated differentiator within match-3 is AI-driven difficulty adaptation. Thus, levels adjust based on player skill. Level design services: Level production, AI-driven difficulty adaptation, booster and power-up design, progression system design, obstacle balancing, social and competitive feature integration, monetization-integrated level design. Verdict: An accessible full-cycle option with a technically interesting differentiator in AI-driven balancing. What they do well: Gamecrio builds monetization architecture into the level design process: IAP placement, rewarded ad integration, battle passes, and subscription models are considered alongside difficulty curves and obstacle sequencing. The AI-driven difficulty adaptation is a genuine technical capability that more established studios in this market have been slower to implement. Where they fit: Early-stage studios that need a full-cycle match-3 build with monetization designed in from the first level. Honest caveat: No publicly named shipped match-3 titles are listed on their site — request live App Store links and verifiable retention data before committing to any engagement. Juego Studios | Full-cycle and co-development partner with puzzle genre credentials and flexible engagement entry points Founded in 2013, Juego Studios is a global full-cycle game development and co-development partner with offices in India, USA, UK, and KSA. With 250+ delivered projects and clients including Disney, Sony, and Tencent, the studio covers game development, game art, and LiveOps across genres. Battle Gems is their verifiable genre credential. Level design services: Level production, difficulty balancing, progression system design, booster and mechanic integration, LiveOps level content, milestone-based level delivery, co-development level design support. Verdict: A well-resourced, credible full-cycle partner with a flexible engagement model that reduces the risk of committing to the wrong studio. What they do well: Juego's engagement model is flexible: studios can start with a risk-free 2-week test sprint, then scale to 20+ team members across modules without recruitment overhead. Three engagement models (outstaffing, dedicated teams, and managed outsourcing) let publishers choose how much control they retain versus how much they hand off. LiveOps is a named service line covering analytics-driven content updates and retention optimization after launch. Where they fit: Studios that need a full-cycle or co-development partner for a match-3 build and want to test the relationship before committing to full project scope. Honest caveat: Puzzle and match-3 are part of a broad genre portfolio that also spans VR, Web3, and enterprise simulations. How to Use This List The seven companies above cover the full range of what the match-3 level design market offers in 2026. The quality range is real, and the right choice depends on which service type matches the problem you're trying to solve. If your game is live and retention is the problem, you need a specialist who can diagnose and fix a difficulty curve. If you're building from zero and need art, engineering, and level design bundled, a full-cycle partner is the right call and the specialist is the wrong one. The honest caveat pattern across several entries in this list reflects a real market condition: verified, named match-3 credentials are rarer than studios' self-descriptions suggest. The companies that couldn't point to a live title with an App Store link were flagged honestly. Asking for live game references, retention data, and a first conversation before any commitment are things you can do before signing with any studio on this list.

    Best AI Tools for Content Creators in 2026

    March 30, 2026
    Best Crypto to Buy Now: What Investors Are Watching in the Changing Digital Asset Market 

    Best Crypto to Buy Now: What Investors Are Watching in the Changing Digital Asset Market 

    March 30, 2026
    "Life of a Showgirl," 2025

    Taylor Swift Sued Over Trademark For “The Life of a Showgirl”

    March 30, 2026

    Mark Wahlberg Launches 4AM Club Challenge YouTube Series

    March 26, 2026
    "The Shrouds," 2024

    “The Shrouds,” SeeMeRot, & The History of Corpse Cameras

    March 25, 2026

    “They Will Kill You” A Violent, Blood-Splattering Good Time [review]

    March 24, 2026
    "Lights Out," 2016

    Connor Osborn McIntyre Attached to Write “Lights Out 2”

    March 30, 2026
    "Happy Death Day 2U," 2019

    Jessica Rothe Says “Happy Death Day 3” is ‘Just a Matter of When’

    March 27, 2026

    Andrew Garfield Watched the ‘Controversial’ “Harry Potter” Movies

    March 27, 2026
    Glen Powell's casting announcement as Fox McCloud in “Super Mario Galaxy Movie”

    “Super Mario Galaxy Movie” Cast Adds Glen Powell as Fox McCloud

    March 27, 2026
    “Malcolm in the Middle: Life’s Still Unfair,” 2026

    “Malcolm in the Middle” Could Get a Full-Fledged Reboot

    March 30, 2026

    Survivor 50 Episode 6 Predictions: Who Will Be Voted Off Next?

    March 27, 2026

    “Star Trek: Starfleet Academy” to End With 2nd Season

    March 23, 2026

    Paapa Essiedu Faces Death Threats Over Snape Casting in HBO’s Harry Potter Series

    March 22, 2026

    “They Will Kill You” A Violent, Blood-Splattering Good Time [review]

    March 24, 2026

    “Project Hail Mary” Familiar But Triumphant Sci-Fi Adventure [review]

    March 14, 2026

    “The Bride” An Overly Ambitious Creature Feature Reimagining [review]

    March 10, 2026

    “Peaky Blinders: The Immortal Man” Solid Send Off For Everyone’s Favorite Gangster [review]

    March 6, 2026
    Check Out Our Latest
      • Product Reviews
      • Reviews
      • SDCC 2021
      • SDCC 2022
    Related Posts
    • The CW Fall 2021: "Legends of the Hidden Temple," and More!
    • The CW Renews Arrowverse Shows "The Flash," "Batwoman," and More!
    • "The Flash" Star Hartley Sawyer Fired Over Racist, Transphobic, & Misogynistic Tweets
    NERDBOT
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    Nerdbot is owned and operated by Nerds! If you have an idea for a story or a cool project send us a holler on Editors@Nerdbot.com

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.