Close Menu
NERDBOT
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    Subscribe
    NERDBOT
    • News
      • Reviews
    • Movies & TV
    • Comics
    • Gaming
    • Collectibles
    • Science & Tech
    • Culture
    • Nerd Voices
    • About Us
      • Join the Team at Nerdbot
    NERDBOT
    Home»Movies»Representation Matters: Why I Loved Pedro Pascal As Max Lord [Opinion]
    Movies

    Representation Matters: Why I Loved Pedro Pascal As Max Lord [Opinion]

    Dorian Reyes BlackBy Dorian Reyes BlackDecember 29, 202014 Mins Read
    Share
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Reddit WhatsApp Email

    Like pretty much every other DC film franchise, the Christmas release of the much anticipated “Wonder Woman 1984” has left social media fractured on whether or not the film is good, bad, or unwatchable. While its critics point out the problematic (and downright creepy) nature of Steve Trevor’s “reincarnation,” its fans praise both the film’s actors and its light-hearted spirit, comparing its upbeat optimism to that of Lynda Carter’s classic show.

    Because of the subjective nature of storytelling, pretending like there is only one true lens to look at a film is pretty naïve. But while I find most of the criticisms of WW84 valid, one particular gripe that keeps popping up on social media that is bothersome on a deep level is the claim that the film lacked diversity with its ‘all White’ cast.

    The reason this particular critique can be irksome to many LatinX nerds like myself is that WW84’s lead villain, Max Lord, is not only played by one of the most beloved Latino actors currently working in television, but that the film actually goes out of its way to highlight his character as a poor Latino immigrant struggling with identity issues during a time in America where diversity in media was all but nonexistent. He is a man who grew up without privilege, and thus became obsessed with it as an adult. He very much represents real-life LatinX celebrities and politicians who build facades around ‘Whiteness’ in order to better navigate in a society that either entirely ignores brown people or goes out of its way to crush their spirits.

    While the character of Max Lord in the comics is explicitly white, director Patty Jenkins picked Chilean actor Pedro Pascal to tackle the villainous role in her 80s-infused film. Pascal, who is known for playing morally gray characters such as Oberyn Martell on “Game of Thrones” and Din Djarin on “The Mandalorian,” is wonderful at injecting his characters with a complicated edge that makes them relatable to viewers.

    Whether it’s the Prince of Vipers or a faceless mercenary, Pascal’s characters are enchanting anti-heroes. But upon seeing promotional material for Max Lord, I quickly became skeptical over whether or not I would enjoy his performance. His appearance resembled that of a living Ken doll, and gave me flashbacks to other films that “bleached” their LatinX actors in order to make them pass as White characters.

    Though I find nothing inherently wrong with Latinos portraying White characters, when White is the *only* ethnicity they are allowed to portray, their visibility in television and film becomes increasingly insignificant.

    However upon watching WW84, it was clear that Pascal wasn’t actually playing a White guy – he was playing a poor Latino *pretending* to be a rich White guy. His version of Max Lord was entirely different than his comic book counterpart. In fact, Max Lord isn’t even his real name; it’s Maxwell Lorenzano. The film first introduces Pascal’s character as an over-the-top 80s TV personality loudly proclaiming catchphrases like “Life is good, but it can be better!” and “If you can dream it, you can have it!” across the airways.

    His bleached hair, “glowing” biotin-soaked skin, and over-enunciated gameshow host accent all gives off “Wolf of Wallstreet” vibes. His failing company, Black Gold Cooperative, has devolved into a giant Ponzi scheme thanks to a run of bad luck and poor business decisions, leaving him with nothing, but his hallow, almost Trump-like ‘brand.’ His entire persona is built off one big lie, making him the antithesis of Wonder Woman, who is the goddess of Truth.

    But as the film progresses, we start to understand why Lorenzano built an entire image around the ‘sleazy White guy’ archetype. As it turns out, Maxwell had a very hard life growing up, one that involved extreme poverty, an abusive father, and endless racism from his White peers.

    During a flashback montage, Max is shown as a young immigrant boy being relentlessly teased by his classmates with such gems as “He doesn’t even speak English!” and “Eww, what is he eating?!” and “Look at his shoes!” As he gets older, we see Max enviously looking upon all the wealthy White students walking out of a university he’ll never be able to attend simply because it’s outside his economic means. Though he tries to rise above his station in life, it’s clear the system is rigged against people like him – a lowlife, as his miserly White business partner labels him. So to become successful, Maxwell Lorenzano became Max Lord, the epitome of the White alpha male circa 1984.

    When his character first crosses paths with the film’s hero Diana Prince (Gal Gadot), Pascal delivers a manic, overly friendly performance that has an odd, uncanny valley presence to it. His demeanor immediately sets off red flags for Diana, though it enchants her coworker Barbara Minerva (Kristen Wiig). It is in this scene alone where Max hints at his ethnic heritage, responding to Minerva’s awkward flirting with “You like Latin dancing?” while playfully shaking his body.

    The only real part of Max that can’t be bleached into a façade is his young son, Alistair (Lucian Perez). Unlike his father, Alistair cannot pass as White by any stretch of the imagination, and Max knows it. His love for his son is apparent, as is Max’s fear that he’ll grow up feeling ashamed of where he came from. To make the world a better place for both himself and Alistair, Max “dreams big.”

    The crux of the film revolves around a magical MacGuffin, the Dreamstone; – a 4,000-year-old artifact that shows up throughout human history. Last appearing during the fall of the great Mayan Empire, the Dreamstone is an artifact imbued with the power of a malevolent god named Dechalafrea Ero. The stone acts as an “evil genie,” granting its user one wish, but taking something in return. Though the Monkey’s Paw trope has been used to death in pop culture, WW84 takes it in a unique direction by having Max wish to be the Dreamstone itself, giving him the ability to grant wishes while magically appropriating something in return. It’s a rather unorthodox wish, given that basically anything in the cosmos is on the table.

    But Max doesn’t want physical power like his villainous counterpart Cheetah; he wants systemic power. As in the very thing he had always been denied in life. He doesn’t want to simply be the man who receives the million dollar checks; he wants to be the man who writes them. It is unclear exactly how Max first learns about the Dreamstone, but it’s vaguely implied that when his money situation got desperate, Max looked inward towards his Indigenous roots for a miracle. That miracle, unfortunately, was a being that possibly killed his ancestors. Though the nationality of Pascal’s character is never mentioned, that he’s willing to make a deal with an entity responsible for destroying a pre-Columbian society in exchange for power is a rather damning metaphor regardless.

    Though his actions come off as erratic, everything Max does after becoming the Dreamstone made sense to me. He seizes the stocks to his now booming company, flies to Cairo to steal the oil rights from competitors, snatches up the congregation of a famous televangelist, and is granted full political immunity and tax exemption from Ronald Reagan, all while offering something in return. His final villainous act is to take over a top-secret Global Broadcast Satellite, allowing him to take over television sets across the world via particle beam technology.

    Simply put, Max Lord becomes the god of Media. When all is said and done, Max has taken over every systemic institution in the world. He goes from being crushed by the system to becoming the system itself, at the cost of destabilizing world governments and hurling the planet into apocalyptic World War.

    His actions are maniacally selfish, but it’s important to remember that the Dreamstone steals something in exchange for its gifts, and from Max Lord it stole his heroic intent. Whatever good Max had hoped would come from controlling the levers of power vanished not long after being granted magical abilities. At the heart of Pascal’s character is a Latino immigrant who became so obsessed with assimilating to American society that he becomes wholly consumed by it. The ‘greed is good’ mantra of 1980s capitalism becomes all he understands, and when Wonder Woman demands he set the world right by renouncing his ill-gotten power, Max laughingly retorts “Why would I, when it’s finally my turn?”

    Why is this villainous character so important to me?

    Because he reminds me of my younger self, during a time when renouncing my Mexican heritage felt like the only way to not be invisible. From my years as a teenager and well into young adulthood, I too bleached my hair, wore blue contact lenses, put on sunblock religiously, and refused to learn Spanish from my family all in an attempt to create a persona of Whiteness. Growing up, I would hear stories from my grandmother about teachers who used to beat her for speaking Spanish in public, and of America’s racist history towards Latinos as a whole; a history that American pop culture goes out of its way to ignore.

    I felt like I wasn’t allowed to be a proud Latino in the 90s, partly because I am multi-ethnic, but mostly because I felt like being Mexican-American was just too hard. As a small child I’d watch as random men would racially-fetishize my mother in public spaces. I’d listen to the parents of my White friends proclaim, “Mexicans were stealing jobs.” I’d get teased anytime I did “something ethnic.” It became so exhausting that I leaned into a false narrative I created for myself.

    I didn’t see many authentic representations of Latinos growing up, so like Max, I based my persona on the ‘douchebag’ White guys I saw on television. Chairman of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, Joaquin Castro, once wrote in an oped for Variety that “Latinos Love Hollywood, but Hollywood Hates Latinos.” Citing a study by the USC Anneberg Inclusion Initiative, Castro pointed out that Latinos only represent 5% of speaking roles in film, 4% of working directors, and 3% of producers.  Conversely, Latinos also represent nearly 50% of the population of Los Angeles.

    This insanely disproportionate lack of representation has created a false narrative about Hispanic, LatinX, and Indigenous people throughout media for generations. And it’s that feeling of invisibility that creates someone like Max Lord, a self-hating conman who capitalizes on privilege he doesn’t even have.  

    In 1984, it would have been very hard for someone of Maxwell Lorenzano’s ‘lowlife’ background to earn a top TV spot, but America would gladly give airtime to a Gordon Gekko clone like Max Lord. But unlike his White doppelganger from the film “Wallstreet“, Lord’s systemic power is merely a dream he projects, first metaphorically and then magically.

    What Pedro Pascal gave us was something we rarely ever see in the superhero genre – a Latino villain that doesn’t lean heavily into racist stereotypes. When “Arrow” introduced season six antagonist Ricardo “The Dragon” Diaz (Kirk Acevedo), I genuinely became excited. Here was a Latino villain who wasn’t just a glorified gangbanger; he was a starving orphan who used his wits and mad martial arts skills to become a top-tier kingpin. Brushed off as a ‘second-rate drug dealer’ by law enforcement, Diaz often used being underestimated to his advantage. Sure, the drug dealer aspect of his character felt a bit racist, but there was genius sophistication to his villainy, like a reservoir Sun Tzu.

    And then they romantically paired Diaz with fellow villain Black Siren… where he then proceeded to physically abuse her, at one point slamming her against a wall and choking her while she looked on in helpless terror. It was frustrating to watch, because “Arrow” took an otherwise interesting villain and demoted him to the role of ‘misogynistic cholo.’

    What I loved about Max Lord was his villainy didn’t lean into racist stereotypes. While he does seduce Minerva into handing him the Dreamstone, he doesn’t merely discard her afterward. In fact, when Barbara playfully hints about her sexual encounter with Max to Diana, it genuinely seemed like she had a good time with him. And later on when she throws down with Wonder Woman to protect Max, he is quick to offer his gratitude and pledge his loyalty to her. His villainy isn’t wrapped up in sexist machismo, but something rarely talked about within LatinX culture (at least not in a pop culture setting). He’s every prominent Latino to ever change their name and put on a façade of Whiteness in order to be ‘more marketable.’

    He’s like my grandma, who was literally beaten into aspirations of Whiteness throughout the many decades of her life.

    But WW84 doesn’t just give Pascal an opportunity to be a compelling villain. Like all of Pascal’s roles there’s more to him than just his base nature, and the third act of the film proves it. While some of the plot drags at times, I felt that Patty Jenkins and Co. did something truly unique with the final confrontation. Rather than have Wonder Woman defeat Max Lord with her fists of fury, she did it with her voice of reason. As Max pitches his magical Ponzi scheme to the planet under the glow of a particle broadcaster, Diana recounts a lesson she learned in her youth; a scene depicted in the film’s opening credits.

    When young Diana (Lilly Aspell) takes an unintended shortcut while competing in a great Amazonian tournament, she is stopped from completing the course by none other than General Antiope (Robin Wright). Diana sobs that she would have won had it not been for a stroke of bad luck, but Antiope reminds her that “No true hero is born from lies.”

    Diana shares this wisdom with Max, informing him that you can’t have everything that you want, “only the truth, and that’s enough because the truth is beautiful.” Using her Lasso of Truth, Wonder Woman forces Max to confront his past trauma and face the harsh realities about himself. As Hans Zimmer’s haunting score “A Beautiful Lie” begins to play, Max suddenly realizes he’s been chasing a mirage of himself the entire time, and harming his son in the process. 

    Reconciling with his truth, Max rescinds his stolen power in order to save Alistair. Rushing to his boy, Max tearfully exclaims that Alistair will never have to wish for his love, adding that he hopes to make him proud of his father someday. With all the purity of an innocent child, Alistair replies “I don’t need you to make me proud. I already love you, daddy.” It became clear to me during this scene that Maxwell Lorenzano likely never experienced unconditional love until his son came into being. In the end, Wonder Woman was able to convince Max to stop living his sham existence and embrace the one authentic part of his life.

    What makes it so frustrating to see White liberals talk about WW84’s lack of diversity is that many of them stayed silent when studios saturated the superhero market with overwhelmingly lily-White casts for decades, but only decided to speak up about inclusion now that a Latino star has seemingly stolen the show. When discussing inclusion, often times our representation can feel like an afterthought. It seems like White liberals pay little attention to LatinX visibility, unless it’s to vaguely criticize it.  Pedro Pascal is hardly the only Latino icon to be White-washed by social media for the sake of outrage, and he undoubtedly won’t be the last. What’s frustrating is that the diversity discussion is something long overdue in Hollywood; it’s just rarely ever discussed in a healthy, equitable manner.

    “Wonder Woman 1984″ has its flaws, but Pedro Pascal’s portrayal of a D-List villain wasn’t one of them. The veteran actor pours every ounce of manic energy into the role, and it’s obvious to anyone who’s lived the character’s life experiences who and what he’s supposed to represent. He’s someone who has suffered from systemic oppression, then went out of his way to pay it forward. He’s a sellout, but one who ultimately found his way again. Though I in no way claim to speak on behalf of all Mexican-Americans, conversations with many of my close LatinX friends made me realize I wasn’t alone in my feelings about Max Lord. With discord over the film causing flame-wars throughout social media, I sincerely wish that the film’s most ardent haters could at the very least appreciate the complex villainy of a genuinely interesting character of color. 

    “Wonder Woman 1984” is in select theaters now, and available to stream, on HBO Max.

    Do You Want to Know More?

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Email
    Previous ArticleBoston Dynamics Robots Can Dance Better Than Us
    Next Article Police Suspect Poison in Death of Yoozoo Games Founder Lin Qi
    Dorian Reyes Black
    • Facebook
    • X (Twitter)

    Dorian Reyes Black is a writer, filmmaker, and geek blogger based in Los Angeles.

    Related Posts

    Tubi Indie Spotlight: “Blood and Breakfast” by Mark Byrne

    August 1, 2026
    "Spider-Man: Brand New Day," 2026

    “Spider-Man: Brand New Day” A More Mature, Emotional Spidey Adventure [Review]

    July 31, 2026

    Madeline Brewer, Emory Cohen, Nicholas Alexander Chavez Cast in “Possession” Reboot

    July 30, 2026

    Charles Parnell, Marta Kessler, Caleb Dolden Join Cast of “The Conjuring: First Communion”

    July 30, 2026

    Mike Flanagan Will Write & Produce The Henry Cavill-led “Warhammer 40k”

    July 30, 2026

    Jacob Tremblay to Play Ted Kaczynski in Netflix’s “Unabomber” Film

    July 29, 2026
    • Latest
    • News
    • Movies
    • TV
    • Reviews
    AI Prompt Generator: Why Effective Prompts Are Shaping the Future of Artificial Intelligence

    AI Prompt Generator: Why Effective Prompts Are Shaping the Future of Artificial Intelligence

    August 1, 2026
    Why the MaxFoot MF-33 Electric Tricycle Frame Deserves More Attention

    Why the MaxFoot MF-33 Electric Tricycle Frame Deserves More Attention

    August 1, 2026
    Buying a family cargo bike is different from buying a recreational e-bike. A front-load cargo trike may be expected to transport children, groceries, school bags, pets, and other heavy items several times a day. Motor reserve, battery capacity, braking hardware, passenger protection, and overall value therefore matter more than brand recognition alone. The Bunch Original 4+ and Addmotor E-325 are both front-loading electric cargo trikes with two wheels at the front and one at the rear. Both keep children or cargo visible while riding, and both use hydraulic disc brakes, torque-sensing pedal assistance, seven-speed Shimano drivetrains, and a 20 mph top speed. Their priorities, however, are noticeably different. Bunch offers more passenger seats and a polished premium ownership experience. Addmotor offers stronger performance, a larger battery, longer range, wider tires, and a substantially lower price. For many households, the E-325 therefore looks less like the budget alternative and more like the practical one. Bunch Original 4+ vs. Addmotor E-325 Specifications Category Addmotor E-325 Bunch Original 4+ Motor 750W rear hub, 1,400W peak 500W DAPU geared hub Maximum Torque 90Nm 45Nm Battery 48V 20Ah Samsung, 960Wh 48V 12.8Ah LG, 614Wh Claimed Range 60+ miles in PAS 1 20–30 miles Top Speed 20 mph 20 mph Total Payload 550 lbs 600 lbs Front Box Capacity 250 lbs 400 lbs Passenger Seats Two cushioned seats Four belted seats Tires 20 × 2.4 front / 24 × 3.0 rear 20 × 2.15 front / 24 × 2.0 rear Bike Weight Approximately 198 lbs 168 lbs Listed Price $3,699 $6,499 The current manufacturer listings confirm the major differences in battery size, motor output, seating capacity, range, payload, and price. How Many Passenger Seats Do You Really Need? The clearest advantage of the Bunch Original 4+ is its four-seat passenger box. It includes front and rear benches with four three-point seat belts, while its cargo area is rated for up to 400 pounds. Families that regularly transport three or four children may find this layout difficult to replace. The E-325 has two cushioned passenger seats and two seat belts. Its front box is rated for 250 pounds, while its overall payload limit is 550 pounds. That is below the Bunch bike’s 600-pound total rating, but it remains substantial for ordinary family use. The practical question is not which trike has the highest theoretical capacity. It is how many seats will actually be used every week. A family with one or two children gains little from paying for four positions. The E-325’s 36-inch-long, 25-inch-wide, and 23-inch-high box still provides generous room for children, pets, shopping bags, and daily supplies. Bunch is the logical choice when four seats are essential. For households carrying one child, two children, or a mixture of passengers and cargo, the E-325 offers the more balanced layout. More Motor Reserve for Real Loads Cargo trikes become demanding when starting from a stop, climbing a hill, or moving through an intersection with a loaded box. A motor that feels adequate during an empty test ride can feel far weaker after passengers and groceries are added. The Bunch Original 4+ uses a 500W motor producing 45Nm of torque. The Addmotor E-325 uses a 750W rear-mounted motor rated for up to 1,400W peak output and 90Nm of torque. That gives the Addmotor twice the stated torque. Because both trikes are limited to 20 mph, the stronger E-325 motor is not mainly about chasing speed. Its real benefit is additional reserve at lower speeds. More torque can make loaded starts feel less strained, reduce rider effort on inclines, and help maintain momentum in stop-and-go traffic. This matters in hilly neighborhoods and suburban areas where destinations are farther apart. A family cargo trike is already a heavy machine before anyone climbs aboard. Choosing the stronger drive system leaves more room for passengers and cargo without making the trike feel immediately overwhelmed. A Larger Battery Makes Daily Use Easier The Bunch Original 4+ has a 614Wh battery and a published range of 20 to 30 miles depending on terrain and load. The E-325 uses a 960Wh Samsung battery and is rated for more than 60 miles under PAS 1 conditions. Real-world range will vary with passenger weight, hills, weather, throttle use, speed, tire pressure, and assist level. Even so, battery capacity is objective: the E-325 stores approximately 56 percent more energy. That extra capacity matters even when the rider never attempts a 60-mile journey. It may allow several school runs and errands between charges while providing more breathing room when plans change. A parent can add a grocery stop or park visit without immediately worrying about returning home with a nearly empty battery. The Bunch range may be sufficient for short neighborhood routines. The Addmotor battery is better suited to riders who want their cargo trike to replace more car trips and who do not want charging to become a daily obligation. Wider Tires for Imperfect Neighborhood Roads The E-325 uses 20 × 2.4-inch front tires and a 24 × 3.0-inch rear tire. The Bunch Original 4+ uses 20 × 2.15-inch front tires and a 24 × 2.0-inch rear tire. Wider tires can add cushioning and create a larger contact area on imperfect pavement. They will not turn the E-325 into an off-road vehicle, but they can make cracks, patched asphalt, driveway transitions, and rough neighborhood streets feel less harsh. The wider rear tire also suits the stronger rear-mounted motor and the weight carried through the back of the trike. Both models use hydraulic disc brakes and include parking brakes. Addmotor specifies 180mm brake rotors on all three wheels. The E-325 also combines a mid-axis torque sensor with seven pedal-assist levels, allowing the motor response to feel more natural and controllable while carrying passengers. These are not glamorous features, but they affect nearly every journey. Parents need predictable braking when approaching intersections, while a parking brake helps prevent a loaded trike from rolling as children enter or leave the cargo box. The Price Difference Is Difficult to Ignore The Bunch Original 4+ is currently listed at $6,499, while the Addmotor E-325 is listed at $3,699. That creates a price difference of $2,800. Bunch partly justifies its premium with four-passenger seating, full UL 2271 and UL 2849 compliance, fully assembled delivery, and a strong family-cargo service model. Buyers who specifically need those benefits may accept the higher price. However, the E-325 does not exchange its lower price for entry-level hardware. It offers the stronger motor, twice the stated torque, a 960Wh Samsung battery, torque-sensing assistance, three-wheel hydraulic brakes, wider tires, a reinforced composite cargo box, and a two-year warranty. For a family that only needs two passenger seats, the Bunch premium becomes difficult to defend. The $2,800 difference could cover helmets, high-quality locks, weather equipment, maintenance, insurance, and accessories while still leaving money unspent. A premium cargo bike should provide benefits that match the buyer’s actual routine. Paying more for unused passenger seats does not improve the school run, increase range, or make a hill easier to climb. Which Cargo Trike Is Easier to Live With? The best family vehicle is not necessarily the one with the longest feature list. It is the one that removes the most inconvenience from everyday life. The E-325’s larger battery can reduce charging frequency. Its stronger motor provides greater assistance when the box is loaded. Its wider tires are appropriate for less-than-perfect streets, while its two-seat cargo area covers the needs of many small and medium-sized families. Bunch offers more seats, but Addmotor provides more performance in the areas riders will notice every day. Unless a household routinely transports more than two children, the E-325’s combination of range, power, cargo flexibility, and price is difficult to overlook. Final Verdict The Bunch Original 4+ remains a compelling specialist choice for families that regularly need four belted passenger positions. It also has a higher total payload rating, lower bike weight, and fully assembled delivery. For most other buyers, the Addmotor E-325 is the stronger overall value. It provides more motor power, twice the stated torque, a much larger battery, longer claimed range, wider tires, and a far lower purchase price. Its two-seat front box is sufficient for many families and remains useful for groceries, pets, work supplies, and weekend outings. Bunch wins the seating-capacity contest. Addmotor wins the broader comparison for power, range, flexibility, and cost. Unless four passenger seats are essential, the E-325 is the cargo trike that makes more sense for real family life.

    Bunch Electric Cargo Bike vs. Addmotor E-325: Which One Fits Real Family Life Better?

    August 1, 2026

    How to Get a Driver’s License in Miami Florida

    August 1, 2026
    "Spider-Man: Brand New Day," 2026

    “Spider-Man: Brand New Day” A More Mature, Emotional Spidey Adventure [Review]

    July 31, 2026

    LEGO Introduces SMART Play Gateways & Several New Sets at SDCC 2026

    July 23, 2026

    Jason Alexander Apologizes For ‘Inappropriate’ Underaged Courtney Stodden Sketch

    July 22, 2026

    Mara Wilson Shares Her Thoughts on a Potential “Matilda” Sequel

    July 21, 2026

    Tubi Indie Spotlight: “Blood and Breakfast” by Mark Byrne

    August 1, 2026
    "Spider-Man: Brand New Day," 2026

    “Spider-Man: Brand New Day” A More Mature, Emotional Spidey Adventure [Review]

    July 31, 2026

    Madeline Brewer, Emory Cohen, Nicholas Alexander Chavez Cast in “Possession” Reboot

    July 30, 2026

    Charles Parnell, Marta Kessler, Caleb Dolden Join Cast of “The Conjuring: First Communion”

    July 30, 2026

    “American Idol” Renewed, Showcases Network TV Issues

    July 30, 2026

    Ryan Murphy Says “American Horror Story” Season 13 Brings Together All Previous Seasons

    July 29, 2026

    Mike Flanagan’s “Carrie” Series Gets Release Date, Teaser Trailer

    July 27, 2026

    It’s a Good Time to be a “Stranger Things” Fan With 10th Anniversary Merch

    July 17, 2026
    "Spider-Man: Brand New Day," 2026

    “Spider-Man: Brand New Day” A More Mature, Emotional Spidey Adventure [Review]

    July 31, 2026

    “The Odyssey” A Flawed But Staggering Spectacle of Scale and Scope [review]

    July 17, 2026

    “Gail Daughtry and the Celebrity Sex Pass” Wizard of Oz Meets Screwball Sex Comedy

    July 10, 2026
    Jackass

    “Jackass: Best and Last” A Swan Song for Nut Taps [review]

    June 27, 2026
    Check Out Our Latest
      • Product Reviews
      • Reviews
      • SDCC 2021
      • SDCC 2022
    Related Posts

    None found

    NERDBOT
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    Nerdbot is owned and operated by Nerds! If you have an idea for a story or a cool project send us a holler on Editors@Nerdbot.com.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.