Close Menu
NERDBOT
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    Subscribe
    NERDBOT
    • News
      • Reviews
    • Movies & TV
    • Comics
    • Gaming
    • Collectibles
    • Science & Tech
    • Culture
    • Nerd Voices
    • About Us
      • Join the Team at Nerdbot
    NERDBOT
    Home»Movies»The Exquisite Pain of the Bad Movie
    Movies

    The Exquisite Pain of the Bad Movie

    Amanda RossenrodeBy Amanda RossenrodeDecember 24, 20177 Mins Read
    Share
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Reddit WhatsApp Email

    To many, watching a bad movie is a disappointing experience, like getting a poorly made sandwich or ordering anything from Taco Bell. You were expecting something satisfying, often times you paid money for it. What you got was Fritos and beef sauce angrily slammed into a Dorito shell by a menacing teenager. But bad movies, like bad pseudo Mexican fast-food, can sometimes be delicious, if there’s love put into it.

    Take Tommy Wiseau’s, The Room, which is currently in the spotlight based on the positive reception of The Disaster Artist, by actor/director, James Franco, depicting Wiseau’s eccentric method of… basically everything. The Room is one of the most terrible/greatest movies ever made by Dracula’s much more frightening cousin.  It’s hammy, makes little to no sense and has extended football playing scenes with people who have obviously never touched a football in their lives. To explain the plot would be akin to explaining molecular science to a drunk cat – there’s no real reason to, it wouldn’t improve the situation in the least. The dialogue spins and rambles like your four year old nephew trying to lie about how dragons made him leave his backpack on the bus. Also like your nephew’s lie, there was supposed to be a vampiric flying car, but someone managed to convince Wiseau that was a little over the top. It’s truly what happens when you write, produce, direct and star in your own film while presumably huffing Magic Markers.

    What truly makes a good bad film is the honest love put into it. Any Sci-Fi Channel movie director can take a sack of cash and some bad CG and make Giganto Lion vs. Croco-Shark starring some hard up ex-child actor from Step by Step. That’s not the same. They are actually trying to be bad, which comes off as lazy and more than a little boring.  Compare Sharknado 5: No One’s Laughing at This Gag Anymore and compare it with the magnificently terrible Birdemic: Shock and Terror. The director of Birdemic, James Nguyen, didn’t even see fit to check if some of his less fantastic scenarios would pan out in the real world. Do they really give million dollar bonuses to solar panel salesmen? Guess so? Would a model taking glamour shots at the CVS really blossom overnight into a Victoria’s Secret Model (one of the highest paid models in the world)? Can you take glamour shots at CVS? Would two millionaires celebrate their success with an evening at Shotgun Charlie’s Freeway Ramp Motel and Morgue? It’s less plausible than fighting Windows 98 Clip Art birds with wire hangers. Even less plausible than being able to steal motel hangers, because they secure those bad boys like ancient artifacts. Indiana Jones couldn’t get a wire hanger out of a Motel 6.

    This is why you don’t throw rice at weddings.

    The point is, every terrible actor, every stunted line, is put forth with the utmost desire to sincerely entertain the audience. And they do, just not in the manner intended. The director of Birdemic: Shock and Terror, is genuinely confused that his work is not considered a romantic thriller in the vein of Hitchcock and rather as one of the finest comedies to hit the Redbox. This is charming, due to the fact that at least one character meets his demise by being smothered with toxic bird poo. Imagine the informing officer who had to report that to the poor victim’s family, while keeping a straight face.

    Troll 2, created by Italian husband and wife team Claudio Fragasso and Rossella Drudiis, is another classic example of befuddled filmmakers with claims to the title of Worst Movie Ever. Troll 2 has exactly zero trolls and one scene where a woman tries to sexualize corn on the cob. The movie is a decidedly anti-vegetarian piece, warning good carnivores of the danger of kale chomping goblins. The filmmakers spoke little English which is clear in the dialogue and plot, which heavily involves a child’s hallucination of his dead grandfather. The film garnered so much anti-success that it led to its own documentary “Worst Movie Ever”, featuring the small town dentist who starred in it.

    *SPOILER* not sexy

    Ah, but you say, that’s an era bygone. Bad sets, bad acting, the whole thing filmed with your cousin’s camcorder and starring your co-workers from Applebees. Times were tough in the late 90’s, we had to dial up our internet and find a payphone to respond to our beepers! Nowadays CG is cheap, millennials killed Applebees and anyone with Adobe and ten bucks worth of green sheets can make their own Jurassic World 2. Moreover, cynicism and nostalgia have created its fair share of films aiming for cheesy.  You are wise young Padawan. But one needs to look no farther than the big budget Hollywood films to find a sweet piece of Gouda.

    Again, the rule to a good bad film is that it is genuine in its sincerity when creating its vision.  And it’s hard to find a film more genuine to its bonkers source material and diehard fans of said bonkers material than Twilight. If you think you’re above watching Twilight, you’re missing out on a great experience. It is one of the great comedies of our time. Besides the fact it instills the importance to young girls of being submissive objects that get chosen by overly aggressive males, it has the puzzling logic of finding one shoe at a bus stop.  And it absolutely ruins vampires. They are no longer tortured undead monsters, but smoldering teens who eternally attend high school, show up on film, eat tater tots as well as rare meat and are fine in the sun so long as it’s partially cloudy. Even then they just glitter like a 1990’s Drew Barrymore fan. Twilight encourages deep internal thought such as “Why enroll in high school for eternity? Aren’t there better ways to hide in plain sight than a system that requires birth certificates, recorded inoculations and parent/teacher meetings while endlessly doing venn diagrams on the symbolism of The Old Man and the Sea? Where do the wolves store their extra pants? Do they get them wholesale? Otherwise that’s a big monthly pant bill.”  As well as the universal “Why does anyone want to be friends with Bella?”  Down the line there’s nonsense about vampire wars and imprinting on small children. Every single scene is blinked through like someone pepper sprayed the set before yelling action.  Watch it as is, or sync it up with its awesome commentary from the guys at Rifftrax.

    There are many great bad movies out there to enjoy, from terrible 80’s slasher films, to over-dramatic Lifetime Original Classics, the B-movies enshrined by Mystery Science Theater 3000 and pretty much anything starring Jennifer Lopez. They are meant to be shared with friends, feasted with delicious snacks and toasted with beverage as some skinny kid gets turned into a plant while shrieking “They’re eating her… and then they’re going to eat me… OH MY GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOD!”

    What is your favorite so bad its good movie? Is it The Boy Next Door? Because He buys Jennifer Lopez a first edition copy of The Illiad for a dollar. Think about that for a second. Let Nerdbot know in the comments!

    Do You Want to Know More?

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Email
    Previous ArticleNerdbot Movie Review: Bright
    Next Article Marvel vs Capcom Dropped From EVO’s Line-up?
    Amanda Rossenrode
    • X (Twitter)

    Amanda Rossenrode is a writer, zombie apocalypse expert and chicken finger connoisseur in Southern California. She loves sleeping, boring people by talking about history and impressing her nephew with her mad Super Mario skills. She fears and respects aliens and escalators. When she grows up she wants to be a Bigfoot Investigator. Is there, like a school for that?

    Related Posts

    Tubi Indie Spotlight: “Blood and Breakfast” by Mark Byrne

    August 1, 2026
    "Spider-Man: Brand New Day," 2026

    “Spider-Man: Brand New Day” A More Mature, Emotional Spidey Adventure [Review]

    July 31, 2026

    Madeline Brewer, Emory Cohen, Nicholas Alexander Chavez Cast in “Possession” Reboot

    July 30, 2026

    Charles Parnell, Marta Kessler, Caleb Dolden Join Cast of “The Conjuring: First Communion”

    July 30, 2026

    Mike Flanagan Will Write & Produce The Henry Cavill-led “Warhammer 40k”

    July 30, 2026

    Jacob Tremblay to Play Ted Kaczynski in Netflix’s “Unabomber” Film

    July 29, 2026
    • Latest
    • News
    • Movies
    • TV
    • Reviews
    AI Prompt Generator: Why Effective Prompts Are Shaping the Future of Artificial Intelligence

    AI Prompt Generator: Why Effective Prompts Are Shaping the Future of Artificial Intelligence

    August 1, 2026
    Why the MaxFoot MF-33 Electric Tricycle Frame Deserves More Attention

    Why the MaxFoot MF-33 Electric Tricycle Frame Deserves More Attention

    August 1, 2026
    Buying a family cargo bike is different from buying a recreational e-bike. A front-load cargo trike may be expected to transport children, groceries, school bags, pets, and other heavy items several times a day. Motor reserve, battery capacity, braking hardware, passenger protection, and overall value therefore matter more than brand recognition alone. The Bunch Original 4+ and Addmotor E-325 are both front-loading electric cargo trikes with two wheels at the front and one at the rear. Both keep children or cargo visible while riding, and both use hydraulic disc brakes, torque-sensing pedal assistance, seven-speed Shimano drivetrains, and a 20 mph top speed. Their priorities, however, are noticeably different. Bunch offers more passenger seats and a polished premium ownership experience. Addmotor offers stronger performance, a larger battery, longer range, wider tires, and a substantially lower price. For many households, the E-325 therefore looks less like the budget alternative and more like the practical one. Bunch Original 4+ vs. Addmotor E-325 Specifications Category Addmotor E-325 Bunch Original 4+ Motor 750W rear hub, 1,400W peak 500W DAPU geared hub Maximum Torque 90Nm 45Nm Battery 48V 20Ah Samsung, 960Wh 48V 12.8Ah LG, 614Wh Claimed Range 60+ miles in PAS 1 20–30 miles Top Speed 20 mph 20 mph Total Payload 550 lbs 600 lbs Front Box Capacity 250 lbs 400 lbs Passenger Seats Two cushioned seats Four belted seats Tires 20 × 2.4 front / 24 × 3.0 rear 20 × 2.15 front / 24 × 2.0 rear Bike Weight Approximately 198 lbs 168 lbs Listed Price $3,699 $6,499 The current manufacturer listings confirm the major differences in battery size, motor output, seating capacity, range, payload, and price. How Many Passenger Seats Do You Really Need? The clearest advantage of the Bunch Original 4+ is its four-seat passenger box. It includes front and rear benches with four three-point seat belts, while its cargo area is rated for up to 400 pounds. Families that regularly transport three or four children may find this layout difficult to replace. The E-325 has two cushioned passenger seats and two seat belts. Its front box is rated for 250 pounds, while its overall payload limit is 550 pounds. That is below the Bunch bike’s 600-pound total rating, but it remains substantial for ordinary family use. The practical question is not which trike has the highest theoretical capacity. It is how many seats will actually be used every week. A family with one or two children gains little from paying for four positions. The E-325’s 36-inch-long, 25-inch-wide, and 23-inch-high box still provides generous room for children, pets, shopping bags, and daily supplies. Bunch is the logical choice when four seats are essential. For households carrying one child, two children, or a mixture of passengers and cargo, the E-325 offers the more balanced layout. More Motor Reserve for Real Loads Cargo trikes become demanding when starting from a stop, climbing a hill, or moving through an intersection with a loaded box. A motor that feels adequate during an empty test ride can feel far weaker after passengers and groceries are added. The Bunch Original 4+ uses a 500W motor producing 45Nm of torque. The Addmotor E-325 uses a 750W rear-mounted motor rated for up to 1,400W peak output and 90Nm of torque. That gives the Addmotor twice the stated torque. Because both trikes are limited to 20 mph, the stronger E-325 motor is not mainly about chasing speed. Its real benefit is additional reserve at lower speeds. More torque can make loaded starts feel less strained, reduce rider effort on inclines, and help maintain momentum in stop-and-go traffic. This matters in hilly neighborhoods and suburban areas where destinations are farther apart. A family cargo trike is already a heavy machine before anyone climbs aboard. Choosing the stronger drive system leaves more room for passengers and cargo without making the trike feel immediately overwhelmed. A Larger Battery Makes Daily Use Easier The Bunch Original 4+ has a 614Wh battery and a published range of 20 to 30 miles depending on terrain and load. The E-325 uses a 960Wh Samsung battery and is rated for more than 60 miles under PAS 1 conditions. Real-world range will vary with passenger weight, hills, weather, throttle use, speed, tire pressure, and assist level. Even so, battery capacity is objective: the E-325 stores approximately 56 percent more energy. That extra capacity matters even when the rider never attempts a 60-mile journey. It may allow several school runs and errands between charges while providing more breathing room when plans change. A parent can add a grocery stop or park visit without immediately worrying about returning home with a nearly empty battery. The Bunch range may be sufficient for short neighborhood routines. The Addmotor battery is better suited to riders who want their cargo trike to replace more car trips and who do not want charging to become a daily obligation. Wider Tires for Imperfect Neighborhood Roads The E-325 uses 20 × 2.4-inch front tires and a 24 × 3.0-inch rear tire. The Bunch Original 4+ uses 20 × 2.15-inch front tires and a 24 × 2.0-inch rear tire. Wider tires can add cushioning and create a larger contact area on imperfect pavement. They will not turn the E-325 into an off-road vehicle, but they can make cracks, patched asphalt, driveway transitions, and rough neighborhood streets feel less harsh. The wider rear tire also suits the stronger rear-mounted motor and the weight carried through the back of the trike. Both models use hydraulic disc brakes and include parking brakes. Addmotor specifies 180mm brake rotors on all three wheels. The E-325 also combines a mid-axis torque sensor with seven pedal-assist levels, allowing the motor response to feel more natural and controllable while carrying passengers. These are not glamorous features, but they affect nearly every journey. Parents need predictable braking when approaching intersections, while a parking brake helps prevent a loaded trike from rolling as children enter or leave the cargo box. The Price Difference Is Difficult to Ignore The Bunch Original 4+ is currently listed at $6,499, while the Addmotor E-325 is listed at $3,699. That creates a price difference of $2,800. Bunch partly justifies its premium with four-passenger seating, full UL 2271 and UL 2849 compliance, fully assembled delivery, and a strong family-cargo service model. Buyers who specifically need those benefits may accept the higher price. However, the E-325 does not exchange its lower price for entry-level hardware. It offers the stronger motor, twice the stated torque, a 960Wh Samsung battery, torque-sensing assistance, three-wheel hydraulic brakes, wider tires, a reinforced composite cargo box, and a two-year warranty. For a family that only needs two passenger seats, the Bunch premium becomes difficult to defend. The $2,800 difference could cover helmets, high-quality locks, weather equipment, maintenance, insurance, and accessories while still leaving money unspent. A premium cargo bike should provide benefits that match the buyer’s actual routine. Paying more for unused passenger seats does not improve the school run, increase range, or make a hill easier to climb. Which Cargo Trike Is Easier to Live With? The best family vehicle is not necessarily the one with the longest feature list. It is the one that removes the most inconvenience from everyday life. The E-325’s larger battery can reduce charging frequency. Its stronger motor provides greater assistance when the box is loaded. Its wider tires are appropriate for less-than-perfect streets, while its two-seat cargo area covers the needs of many small and medium-sized families. Bunch offers more seats, but Addmotor provides more performance in the areas riders will notice every day. Unless a household routinely transports more than two children, the E-325’s combination of range, power, cargo flexibility, and price is difficult to overlook. Final Verdict The Bunch Original 4+ remains a compelling specialist choice for families that regularly need four belted passenger positions. It also has a higher total payload rating, lower bike weight, and fully assembled delivery. For most other buyers, the Addmotor E-325 is the stronger overall value. It provides more motor power, twice the stated torque, a much larger battery, longer claimed range, wider tires, and a far lower purchase price. Its two-seat front box is sufficient for many families and remains useful for groceries, pets, work supplies, and weekend outings. Bunch wins the seating-capacity contest. Addmotor wins the broader comparison for power, range, flexibility, and cost. Unless four passenger seats are essential, the E-325 is the cargo trike that makes more sense for real family life.

    Bunch Electric Cargo Bike vs. Addmotor E-325: Which One Fits Real Family Life Better?

    August 1, 2026

    How to Get a Driver’s License in Miami Florida

    August 1, 2026
    "Spider-Man: Brand New Day," 2026

    “Spider-Man: Brand New Day” A More Mature, Emotional Spidey Adventure [Review]

    July 31, 2026

    LEGO Introduces SMART Play Gateways & Several New Sets at SDCC 2026

    July 23, 2026

    Jason Alexander Apologizes For ‘Inappropriate’ Underaged Courtney Stodden Sketch

    July 22, 2026

    Mara Wilson Shares Her Thoughts on a Potential “Matilda” Sequel

    July 21, 2026

    Tubi Indie Spotlight: “Blood and Breakfast” by Mark Byrne

    August 1, 2026
    "Spider-Man: Brand New Day," 2026

    “Spider-Man: Brand New Day” A More Mature, Emotional Spidey Adventure [Review]

    July 31, 2026

    Madeline Brewer, Emory Cohen, Nicholas Alexander Chavez Cast in “Possession” Reboot

    July 30, 2026

    Charles Parnell, Marta Kessler, Caleb Dolden Join Cast of “The Conjuring: First Communion”

    July 30, 2026

    “American Idol” Renewed, Showcases Network TV Issues

    July 30, 2026

    Ryan Murphy Says “American Horror Story” Season 13 Brings Together All Previous Seasons

    July 29, 2026

    Mike Flanagan’s “Carrie” Series Gets Release Date, Teaser Trailer

    July 27, 2026

    It’s a Good Time to be a “Stranger Things” Fan With 10th Anniversary Merch

    July 17, 2026
    "Spider-Man: Brand New Day," 2026

    “Spider-Man: Brand New Day” A More Mature, Emotional Spidey Adventure [Review]

    July 31, 2026

    “The Odyssey” A Flawed But Staggering Spectacle of Scale and Scope [review]

    July 17, 2026

    “Gail Daughtry and the Celebrity Sex Pass” Wizard of Oz Meets Screwball Sex Comedy

    July 10, 2026
    Jackass

    “Jackass: Best and Last” A Swan Song for Nut Taps [review]

    June 27, 2026
    Check Out Our Latest
      • Product Reviews
      • Reviews
      • SDCC 2021
      • SDCC 2022
    Related Posts

    None found

    NERDBOT
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    Nerdbot is owned and operated by Nerds! If you have an idea for a story or a cool project send us a holler on Editors@Nerdbot.com.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.