Close Menu
NERDBOT
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    Subscribe
    NERDBOT
    • News
      • Reviews
    • Movies & TV
    • Comics
    • Gaming
    • Collectibles
    • Science & Tech
    • Culture
    • Nerd Voices
    • About Us
      • Join the Team at Nerdbot
    NERDBOT
    Home»News»“South Park” Streaming Rights Legal Battle Continues
    "South Park"
    News

    “South Park” Streaming Rights Legal Battle Continues

    Amy DavisBy Amy DavisJuly 15, 20234 Mins Read
    Share
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Reddit WhatsApp Email

    The legal battle between Warner Bros. Discovery and Paramount Global over streaming rights to “South Park” doesn’t show any signs of stopping. Warner Bros. Discovery has filed to have Paramount’s partial motion to dismiss the case tossed out of court. Paramount along with show creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone, were seeking to disperse the $200 million lawsuit all together.

    “South Park”

    “Defendants’ Motion has the dubious distinction of trying to downplay while simultaneously highlighting the very misconduct which forced Plaintiff to file this suit,” a statement from Warner Bros. Discovery reads. “The reality is that Defendant South Park Digital Studios agreed that Plaintiff’s HBO Max streaming platform would be the exclusive destination for consumers looking to stream new episodes of the popular comedy series South Park. Defendants came to regret having granted these exclusive streaming rights to Plaintiff when Paramount Global launched its own streaming platform, Paramount+.”

    All of this stems from a deal made back in 2019 where WBD owned HBO Max (now Max) paid $500 million for the streaming rights to all past episodes and three future seasons. At the time, Paramount’s only streaming service was CBS All Access, which was still trying to find a foothold in the robust [now oversaturated] streaming market. Selling the streaming right to “South Park” for some quick cash didn’t seem like it would be a huge deal.

    The issue arose when Paramount found a loophole in the contract that allowed them to make movies or/specials for Paramount+. Since the contract only pertained to new episodes, this allowed them to stream new “South Park” content while keeping the $500 million. Talk about having your cake and eating it too!

    This also seems to be why the show’s naming conventions and amount of episodes changed. What would have originally run as seasons with individual episodes became specials like “South Park: Post COVID.” And while seasons 17-23 had 10-episode runs, the past 3 seasons have only amounted to 14 episodes, in total. With seasons 24 being 2 episodes long, and seasons 25 and 26 being 6 episodes each. 

    When Warner Bros. Discovery filed suit over this, Paramount said they followed the contract and the specials do not count as episodes. They also claimed that the contract never specified how many episodes per season. Which would be a huge oversight. Though, since the last few seasons had been 10 episodes long, it was reasonable to expect that would continue. (But take this as a reminder to ALWAYS get things like that in writing.)

    To add insult to injury, Paramount+ claimed in 2022 that by 2025, they would be the global streaming hub for all the “South Park” episodes, movies, and made-for-streaming movies. Since the $500 million deal was being paid in installments of $25 million a quarter, Warner Bros. Discovery reacted to all of this by stopping payments, while still streaming episodes of “South Park.” 

    “In short, Defendants’ assertions that it provided all required content to Plaintiff are contradicted by the multitude of factual allegations evincing SPDS’s [South Park Digital Studios] bad faith conduct in diverting new South Park episodes to Paramount+ after granting exclusive streaming rights in such content to Plaintiff,” Warner Bros. Discovery’s opposition filing reads. “At most, Defendants’ assertions present a disputed issue of fact that a jury will need to decide, not grounds for dismissal of Plaintiff’s well-pled claims at the initial pleading stage.”

    “This is not merely ‘garden variety’ behavior as Defendants argue,” Warner Bros. Discovery added. “Rather, it is a textbook example of bad faith business conduct, with a consequential adverse impact on consumers at large. Plaintiff’s claims are based on well-pled factual allegations that go far beyond the minimal requirements necessary to withstand a motion to dismiss. Defendants’ Motion is groundless and should be denied in its entirety.”

    Warner Bros. Discovery is asking New York Judge Margaret Chan to schedule an oral argument hearing on whether Paramount’s partial motion can go forward or not. 

    Neither company has commented on this recent addition to the legal battle at this time. We’ll keep you posted on updates on the streaming future of “South Park” as they become available. 

    Do You Want to Know More?

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Email
    Previous ArticleGrandma Goes Viral for Baking Bread in Her Mailbox
    Next Article Samara Weaving Joins Shawn Simmons’ Thriller “Eenie Meanie”
    Amy Davis

    Hi, I’m Amy. I like long walks in the graveyard, horror movies, comic books, and bringing you the latest in nerd-centric news.

    Related Posts

    Apple TV’s “Drops of God” Decants Season 2 [Interview]

    January 22, 2026

    “Tuner” Classic Piano, Safe Cracking Make Perfect Pair [Review]

    January 21, 2026

    Flight Of The Conchords to Reunite at Netflix is a Joke Fest 2026

    January 20, 2026

    Former Nintendo of America Boss Doug Bowser Joins Hasbro

    January 20, 2026

    Going Ape with “Primate” Star Victoria Wyant [Interview]

    January 20, 2026

    Dwayne Johnson’s ZOA Energy Launches New Fitness Challenge

    January 20, 2026
    • Latest
    • News
    • Movies
    • TV
    • Reviews

    How To Choose the Right Welding Booth for Your Workshop

    January 23, 2026

    Top 6 Mobile Application Developers Trusted by Global Brands

    January 23, 2026

    9 Situations Where an editable PDF is a Major Time Saver

    January 23, 2026

    How Players Judge Reliability in Digital Play

    January 23, 2026

    Apple TV’s “Drops of God” Decants Season 2 [Interview]

    January 22, 2026

    “Tuner” Classic Piano, Safe Cracking Make Perfect Pair [Review]

    January 21, 2026

    Flight Of The Conchords to Reunite at Netflix is a Joke Fest 2026

    January 20, 2026

    Former Nintendo of America Boss Doug Bowser Joins Hasbro

    January 20, 2026

    “Masters of the Universe” Gets Official Teaser

    January 22, 2026

    “Sinners” Breaks Oscars Record with 16 Nominations

    January 22, 2026

    “Tuner” Classic Piano, Safe Cracking Make Perfect Pair [Review]

    January 21, 2026

    Kenan & Kel to “Meet Frankenstein” in New Project

    January 21, 2026

    Apple TV’s “Drops of God” Decants Season 2 [Interview]

    January 22, 2026

    “Cobra Kai” Gets Full Series Physical Media Release

    January 22, 2026

    “For All Mankind” Season 5 Teaser, March Release Date

    January 21, 2026
    "Only Murders in the Building"

    Martin Short Documentary Hitting Netflix in May

    January 20, 2026

    “Tuner” Classic Piano, Safe Cracking Make Perfect Pair [Review]

    January 21, 2026

    Sundance Film Festival: 5 More Films to Watch in 2026

    January 16, 2026

    Sundance Film Festival 2026 Preview: 5 Films We Recommend

    January 15, 2026

    “Greenland 2: Migration” Solid Sequel, The Cost of Survival [Review]

    January 10, 2026
    Check Out Our Latest
      • Product Reviews
      • Reviews
      • SDCC 2021
      • SDCC 2022
    Related Posts

    None found

    NERDBOT
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    Nerdbot is owned and operated by Nerds! If you have an idea for a story or a cool project send us a holler on [email protected]

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.