Close Menu
NERDBOT
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    Subscribe
    NERDBOT
    • News
      • Reviews
    • Movies & TV
    • Comics
    • Gaming
    • Collectibles
    • Science & Tech
    • Culture
    • Nerd Voices
    • About Us
      • Join the Team at Nerdbot
    NERDBOT
    Home»News»“South Park” Streaming Rights Legal Battle Continues
    "South Park"
    News

    “South Park” Streaming Rights Legal Battle Continues

    Amy DavisBy Amy DavisJuly 15, 20234 Mins Read
    Share
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Reddit WhatsApp Email

    The legal battle between Warner Bros. Discovery and Paramount Global over streaming rights to “South Park” doesn’t show any signs of stopping. Warner Bros. Discovery has filed to have Paramount’s partial motion to dismiss the case tossed out of court. Paramount along with show creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone, were seeking to disperse the $200 million lawsuit all together.

    “South Park”

    “Defendants’ Motion has the dubious distinction of trying to downplay while simultaneously highlighting the very misconduct which forced Plaintiff to file this suit,” a statement from Warner Bros. Discovery reads. “The reality is that Defendant South Park Digital Studios agreed that Plaintiff’s HBO Max streaming platform would be the exclusive destination for consumers looking to stream new episodes of the popular comedy series South Park. Defendants came to regret having granted these exclusive streaming rights to Plaintiff when Paramount Global launched its own streaming platform, Paramount+.”

    All of this stems from a deal made back in 2019 where WBD owned HBO Max (now Max) paid $500 million for the streaming rights to all past episodes and three future seasons. At the time, Paramount’s only streaming service was CBS All Access, which was still trying to find a foothold in the robust [now oversaturated] streaming market. Selling the streaming right to “South Park” for some quick cash didn’t seem like it would be a huge deal.

    The issue arose when Paramount found a loophole in the contract that allowed them to make movies or/specials for Paramount+. Since the contract only pertained to new episodes, this allowed them to stream new “South Park” content while keeping the $500 million. Talk about having your cake and eating it too!

    This also seems to be why the show’s naming conventions and amount of episodes changed. What would have originally run as seasons with individual episodes became specials like “South Park: Post COVID.” And while seasons 17-23 had 10-episode runs, the past 3 seasons have only amounted to 14 episodes, in total. With seasons 24 being 2 episodes long, and seasons 25 and 26 being 6 episodes each. 

    When Warner Bros. Discovery filed suit over this, Paramount said they followed the contract and the specials do not count as episodes. They also claimed that the contract never specified how many episodes per season. Which would be a huge oversight. Though, since the last few seasons had been 10 episodes long, it was reasonable to expect that would continue. (But take this as a reminder to ALWAYS get things like that in writing.)

    To add insult to injury, Paramount+ claimed in 2022 that by 2025, they would be the global streaming hub for all the “South Park” episodes, movies, and made-for-streaming movies. Since the $500 million deal was being paid in installments of $25 million a quarter, Warner Bros. Discovery reacted to all of this by stopping payments, while still streaming episodes of “South Park.” 

    “In short, Defendants’ assertions that it provided all required content to Plaintiff are contradicted by the multitude of factual allegations evincing SPDS’s [South Park Digital Studios] bad faith conduct in diverting new South Park episodes to Paramount+ after granting exclusive streaming rights in such content to Plaintiff,” Warner Bros. Discovery’s opposition filing reads. “At most, Defendants’ assertions present a disputed issue of fact that a jury will need to decide, not grounds for dismissal of Plaintiff’s well-pled claims at the initial pleading stage.”

    “This is not merely ‘garden variety’ behavior as Defendants argue,” Warner Bros. Discovery added. “Rather, it is a textbook example of bad faith business conduct, with a consequential adverse impact on consumers at large. Plaintiff’s claims are based on well-pled factual allegations that go far beyond the minimal requirements necessary to withstand a motion to dismiss. Defendants’ Motion is groundless and should be denied in its entirety.”

    Warner Bros. Discovery is asking New York Judge Margaret Chan to schedule an oral argument hearing on whether Paramount’s partial motion can go forward or not. 

    Neither company has commented on this recent addition to the legal battle at this time. We’ll keep you posted on updates on the streaming future of “South Park” as they become available. 

    Do You Want to Know More?

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Email
    Previous ArticleGrandma Goes Viral for Baking Bread in Her Mailbox
    Next Article Samara Weaving Joins Shawn Simmons’ Thriller “Eenie Meanie”
    Amy Davis

    Hi, I’m Amy. I like long walks in the graveyard, horror movies, comic books, and bringing you the latest in nerd-centric news.

    Related Posts

    How to Use Tetris for PTSD Recovery: A Science-Backed Guide

    May 7, 2025

    Funko Announces Price Increases Due to…Reasons

    May 6, 2025
    A Million Lives Book Festival

    Authors Lose Thousands at Failed ‘A Million Lives Book Festival’

    May 6, 2025

    Boost Your Confidence Between the Sheets Today

    May 6, 2025
    Snake that fell into a drink at Patron Mexican Restaurant and Cantina in Sandston, VA

    Virginia Woman Rattled After Snake Falls Into Her Margarita

    May 5, 2025
    Alcatraz, as seen from Pier 39.

    Donald Trump Wants to ‘Rebuild and Open’ Alcatraz Prison

    May 5, 2025
    • Latest
    • News
    • Movies
    • TV
    • Reviews

    All Marvel Rivals Legendary Skins

    May 11, 2025

    How RPA (Robotic Process Automation) is Reshaping Business Models

    May 11, 2025

    Buy Legal FC 26 and PlayStation Accounts Securely with Dicardo

    May 10, 2025

    Rainbow Six Siege A Cool Game of Strategy and Action

    May 10, 2025

    How to Use Tetris for PTSD Recovery: A Science-Backed Guide

    May 7, 2025

    Funko Announces Price Increases Due to…Reasons

    May 6, 2025
    A Million Lives Book Festival

    Authors Lose Thousands at Failed ‘A Million Lives Book Festival’

    May 6, 2025

    Boost Your Confidence Between the Sheets Today

    May 6, 2025

    Cameras to Roll on “Highlander” Reboot this September

    May 9, 2025

    Cameras are Rolling on “Godzilla X Kong: Supernova”

    May 9, 2025
    "Evil Dead Rise"

    “Evil Dead” Sequel Lands Release Date

    May 8, 2025

    “Thunderbolts*” Director Jake Schreier Being Eyed for X-Men Film

    May 8, 2025
    "Ted," 2024

    Seth MacFarlane’s “Ted” Gets Animated Series, Teaser

    May 9, 2025

    Spend 10 Hours With Daredevil Staring at You

    May 8, 2025

    Prime Video’s “Fallout” Wraps Filming on Season 2

    May 8, 2025
    "Squid Game" season 3

    Netflix’s “Squid Game” Gets 1st Trailer For Season 3

    May 6, 2025

    “Friendship” The Funniest Movie I Couldn’t Wait to End [review]

    May 3, 2025

    “Thunderbolts*” Surprisingly Emotional Therapy Session for Anti-Heroes

    May 3, 2025

    “Sinners” is Sexy, Boozy, Bloody, Bluesy, and Amazing [Review]

    April 18, 2025

    “The Legend of Ochi” Cute Puppets, But No Magic [Review]

    April 16, 2025
    Check Out Our Latest
      • Product Reviews
      • Reviews
      • SDCC 2021
      • SDCC 2022
    Related Posts

    None found

    NERDBOT
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    Nerdbot is owned and operated by Nerds! If you have an idea for a story or a cool project send us a holler on [email protected]

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.