Close Menu
NERDBOT
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    Subscribe
    NERDBOT
    • News
      • Reviews
    • Movies & TV
    • Comics
    • Gaming
    • Collectibles
    • Science & Tech
    • Culture
    • Nerd Voices
    • About Us
      • Join the Team at Nerdbot
    NERDBOT
    Home»Movies»“The Boogeyman” Trauma, Cliches, Monsters in the Closet [Review]
    "The Boogeyman," 2023 poster (Twentieth Century Studios)
    Movies

    “The Boogeyman” Trauma, Cliches, Monsters in the Closet [Review]

    Derrick MurrayBy Derrick MurrayJune 1, 20236 Mins Read
    Share
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Reddit WhatsApp Email

    If you did a search for the title on Google, you’d probably find multiple iterations that vary wildly in terms of content, length and medium. Many of these stem from the myths surrounding things that go bump in the night, and many more (particularly in film) source Stephen King‘s short story of the same name, published in 1978. The simplicity of its premise and mythology allow for the expansion of the short story to feel right at home 40+ years later, which is where we find ourselves with “The Boogeyman.” Borrowing the themes of grief, trauma, and fear from its source material, the film attempts to bring all of those ideas to light from the darkness. Though it has a lot on its mind and has moments of solid craft and execution, “The Boogeyman” is hindered by its own tropes and unwillingness to run with the ideas in more imaginative ways.

    "The Boogeyman," 2023
    “The Boogeyman,” 2023 (Twentieth Century Studios)

    Directed by Rob Savage (“Salt,” “Dashcam” from a screenplay by Scott Beck, Bryan Woods and Mark Heyman (Beck and Woods having worked previously on “A Quiet Place” with Heyman drafting the final script) “The Boogyeman” follows the Harper family reeling from the death of their mother. The father Will (Chris Messina) is a therapist incapable of connecting or communicating with his own daughters in the wake of his wife’s death, the oldest Sadie (Sophie Thatcher) withdrawing into herself and unable to let go in the slightest, and their youngest Sawyer (Vivien Lyra Blair aka Little Leia from “Obi Wan Kenobi“) is afraid of the dark. After a mysterious man shows up at their house to seek help from Will only to hang himself in their closet shortly after, the family is plagued by a supernatural presence that thrives in dark corners and dark rooms. Hellbent on tormenting the children until it goes in for the kill, it forces them to not only survive and stay in the light but convince everyone else that there really are monsters in the closet before it’s too late.

    Any time there are three writers listed on a script, I get a little wary of its merit. “The Boogeyman” is no exception, bogged down by a plethora of ideas that leave a bit too much fat to be trimmed to deliver a more concise horror thriller. This leaves the film largely reliant on horror tropes as opposed to letting their themes cook and seep into the viewers psyche. “The Boogeyman” actually works best when it’s shrouded in mystery, and barring some ill advised sub plots that feel like a box check rather than something that enhances the story, it is pretty effective. Savage knows how to use his setting to turn up the creep factors, utilizing every dark corner and practical effect to manifest a genuinely chilling atmosphere. But for every successful moment there’s an ugly trope that renders them ineffective. Not entirely, as I would be lying if I said “The Boogeyman” didn’t get me a few times. But it does leave viewers wanting, with a hope for more of its risks and far less of its tried and true formulaic narrative.

    It’s really Thatcher who takes the reins on this one, and works overtime to put the pieces together and drive the story forward. Without her stellar work, “The Boogeyman” would be largely unrecognizable in a sea of Shudder Originals. Blair is fine as the younger sibling, turning in a better performance than her previous “Obi-Wan” stint, but I’m just not completely sold on her talents just yet. It’s hard when Thatcher is running circles around everyone, even Messina who isn’t necessarily bad as much as the film has way less to say about him and opts to give as little to do as possible. This is a strange choice since the backbone of the narrative rests on the family dynamic and how they’re all choosing to process (or not process in some cases) their own grief. Horror through trauma done right can soar, much like last year’s “Smile,” and while “The Boogeyman” has a similar foundation it doesn’t quite get to where it wants to go thematically.

    “The Boogeyman” 20th Century Studios

    “The Boogeyman” also fails to obey its own rules, and can’t seem to focus itself enough to be consistently unsettling the longer it goes on. The whole idea of the monster is that it preys on the vulnerable and weak, latching onto the trauma of loss as an invitation to torment its prey. At least, that’s what the film wants you to believe, but in practice Sawyer is the one who begins to see the monster first, her only weakness being afraid of the dark. If the idea is that it is being fueled by those with the most grief, then it should be Sadie who gets the brunt of it all. She’s the one incapable of letting go of anything her mother left behind, even wearing one of her old dresses to school and holding on to a rotting lunch bag as the last note written to her. I get that this feels like nitpicking, but it’s misfires like this that hold “The Boogeyman” back from being as effective as it strives to be. Truthfully, the film would work perfectly fine without Sawyer, and would function better if it zeroed in on the chasm of grief between a father and daughter.

    As concerned as “The Boogeman” is with having something to say, it loses its purpose by the third act, falling victim to one horror cliche after another. There’s even a group of mean girls who are supposedly Sadie’s friends but act more like the worst version of every high school bully for no other reason than to, again, check a horror movie box. It’s really unfortunate, because there is a great film in “The Boogeyman” that is lost by its plethora of pens and conflicting ideas of how to expand the source material. Savage is so effective in using space and Thatcher is enthralling as a sort of final girl you have to wonder why they opted to show the monster at all. The entirety of film is about being terrorized by what you can’t see and how our grief can turn into terror in the dark, and the few times it recognizes this is when it works best. The monster isn’t nearly as scary as the very idea of something lurking behind the door unseen, or a pair of glowing eyes that may or may not be real. It’s the psychological hauntings that work best in “The Boogeyman,” but are used less and less the longer the film runs.

    “The Boogeyman“  is a middling horror film that struggles to balance the effective atmospheric haunts with muddled horror cliches, leaving it unable to mask its obvious trauma allegories and maintain consistent horror intrigue that feels on the cusp of delivering but falls short. 

    Rating: 3 out of 5 Stars

    “The Boogeyman” hits theaters June 2. You can watch the trailer below.

    Do You Want to Know More?

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Email
    Previous ArticleOutdoor Digital Message Board: Enhancing Communication in the Open Air
    Next Article Padma Lakshmi Announces Her “Top Chef” Exit
    Derrick Murray
    • Website
    • Facebook
    • X (Twitter)
    • Instagram

    Derrick Murray is a Los Angeles based stand up comedian, writer, and co-host for The Jack of All Nerds Show.

    Related Posts

    Tubi Indie Spotlight: “Blood and Breakfast” by Mark Byrne

    August 1, 2026
    "Spider-Man: Brand New Day," 2026

    “Spider-Man: Brand New Day” A More Mature, Emotional Spidey Adventure [Review]

    July 31, 2026

    Madeline Brewer, Emory Cohen, Nicholas Alexander Chavez Cast in “Possession” Reboot

    July 30, 2026

    Charles Parnell, Marta Kessler, Caleb Dolden Join Cast of “The Conjuring: First Communion”

    July 30, 2026

    Mike Flanagan Will Write & Produce The Henry Cavill-led “Warhammer 40k”

    July 30, 2026

    Jacob Tremblay to Play Ted Kaczynski in Netflix’s “Unabomber” Film

    July 29, 2026
    • Latest
    • News
    • Movies
    • TV
    • Reviews
    AI Prompt Generator: Why Effective Prompts Are Shaping the Future of Artificial Intelligence

    AI Prompt Generator: Why Effective Prompts Are Shaping the Future of Artificial Intelligence

    August 1, 2026
    Why the MaxFoot MF-33 Electric Tricycle Frame Deserves More Attention

    Why the MaxFoot MF-33 Electric Tricycle Frame Deserves More Attention

    August 1, 2026
    Buying a family cargo bike is different from buying a recreational e-bike. A front-load cargo trike may be expected to transport children, groceries, school bags, pets, and other heavy items several times a day. Motor reserve, battery capacity, braking hardware, passenger protection, and overall value therefore matter more than brand recognition alone. The Bunch Original 4+ and Addmotor E-325 are both front-loading electric cargo trikes with two wheels at the front and one at the rear. Both keep children or cargo visible while riding, and both use hydraulic disc brakes, torque-sensing pedal assistance, seven-speed Shimano drivetrains, and a 20 mph top speed. Their priorities, however, are noticeably different. Bunch offers more passenger seats and a polished premium ownership experience. Addmotor offers stronger performance, a larger battery, longer range, wider tires, and a substantially lower price. For many households, the E-325 therefore looks less like the budget alternative and more like the practical one. Bunch Original 4+ vs. Addmotor E-325 Specifications Category Addmotor E-325 Bunch Original 4+ Motor 750W rear hub, 1,400W peak 500W DAPU geared hub Maximum Torque 90Nm 45Nm Battery 48V 20Ah Samsung, 960Wh 48V 12.8Ah LG, 614Wh Claimed Range 60+ miles in PAS 1 20–30 miles Top Speed 20 mph 20 mph Total Payload 550 lbs 600 lbs Front Box Capacity 250 lbs 400 lbs Passenger Seats Two cushioned seats Four belted seats Tires 20 × 2.4 front / 24 × 3.0 rear 20 × 2.15 front / 24 × 2.0 rear Bike Weight Approximately 198 lbs 168 lbs Listed Price $3,699 $6,499 The current manufacturer listings confirm the major differences in battery size, motor output, seating capacity, range, payload, and price. How Many Passenger Seats Do You Really Need? The clearest advantage of the Bunch Original 4+ is its four-seat passenger box. It includes front and rear benches with four three-point seat belts, while its cargo area is rated for up to 400 pounds. Families that regularly transport three or four children may find this layout difficult to replace. The E-325 has two cushioned passenger seats and two seat belts. Its front box is rated for 250 pounds, while its overall payload limit is 550 pounds. That is below the Bunch bike’s 600-pound total rating, but it remains substantial for ordinary family use. The practical question is not which trike has the highest theoretical capacity. It is how many seats will actually be used every week. A family with one or two children gains little from paying for four positions. The E-325’s 36-inch-long, 25-inch-wide, and 23-inch-high box still provides generous room for children, pets, shopping bags, and daily supplies. Bunch is the logical choice when four seats are essential. For households carrying one child, two children, or a mixture of passengers and cargo, the E-325 offers the more balanced layout. More Motor Reserve for Real Loads Cargo trikes become demanding when starting from a stop, climbing a hill, or moving through an intersection with a loaded box. A motor that feels adequate during an empty test ride can feel far weaker after passengers and groceries are added. The Bunch Original 4+ uses a 500W motor producing 45Nm of torque. The Addmotor E-325 uses a 750W rear-mounted motor rated for up to 1,400W peak output and 90Nm of torque. That gives the Addmotor twice the stated torque. Because both trikes are limited to 20 mph, the stronger E-325 motor is not mainly about chasing speed. Its real benefit is additional reserve at lower speeds. More torque can make loaded starts feel less strained, reduce rider effort on inclines, and help maintain momentum in stop-and-go traffic. This matters in hilly neighborhoods and suburban areas where destinations are farther apart. A family cargo trike is already a heavy machine before anyone climbs aboard. Choosing the stronger drive system leaves more room for passengers and cargo without making the trike feel immediately overwhelmed. A Larger Battery Makes Daily Use Easier The Bunch Original 4+ has a 614Wh battery and a published range of 20 to 30 miles depending on terrain and load. The E-325 uses a 960Wh Samsung battery and is rated for more than 60 miles under PAS 1 conditions. Real-world range will vary with passenger weight, hills, weather, throttle use, speed, tire pressure, and assist level. Even so, battery capacity is objective: the E-325 stores approximately 56 percent more energy. That extra capacity matters even when the rider never attempts a 60-mile journey. It may allow several school runs and errands between charges while providing more breathing room when plans change. A parent can add a grocery stop or park visit without immediately worrying about returning home with a nearly empty battery. The Bunch range may be sufficient for short neighborhood routines. The Addmotor battery is better suited to riders who want their cargo trike to replace more car trips and who do not want charging to become a daily obligation. Wider Tires for Imperfect Neighborhood Roads The E-325 uses 20 × 2.4-inch front tires and a 24 × 3.0-inch rear tire. The Bunch Original 4+ uses 20 × 2.15-inch front tires and a 24 × 2.0-inch rear tire. Wider tires can add cushioning and create a larger contact area on imperfect pavement. They will not turn the E-325 into an off-road vehicle, but they can make cracks, patched asphalt, driveway transitions, and rough neighborhood streets feel less harsh. The wider rear tire also suits the stronger rear-mounted motor and the weight carried through the back of the trike. Both models use hydraulic disc brakes and include parking brakes. Addmotor specifies 180mm brake rotors on all three wheels. The E-325 also combines a mid-axis torque sensor with seven pedal-assist levels, allowing the motor response to feel more natural and controllable while carrying passengers. These are not glamorous features, but they affect nearly every journey. Parents need predictable braking when approaching intersections, while a parking brake helps prevent a loaded trike from rolling as children enter or leave the cargo box. The Price Difference Is Difficult to Ignore The Bunch Original 4+ is currently listed at $6,499, while the Addmotor E-325 is listed at $3,699. That creates a price difference of $2,800. Bunch partly justifies its premium with four-passenger seating, full UL 2271 and UL 2849 compliance, fully assembled delivery, and a strong family-cargo service model. Buyers who specifically need those benefits may accept the higher price. However, the E-325 does not exchange its lower price for entry-level hardware. It offers the stronger motor, twice the stated torque, a 960Wh Samsung battery, torque-sensing assistance, three-wheel hydraulic brakes, wider tires, a reinforced composite cargo box, and a two-year warranty. For a family that only needs two passenger seats, the Bunch premium becomes difficult to defend. The $2,800 difference could cover helmets, high-quality locks, weather equipment, maintenance, insurance, and accessories while still leaving money unspent. A premium cargo bike should provide benefits that match the buyer’s actual routine. Paying more for unused passenger seats does not improve the school run, increase range, or make a hill easier to climb. Which Cargo Trike Is Easier to Live With? The best family vehicle is not necessarily the one with the longest feature list. It is the one that removes the most inconvenience from everyday life. The E-325’s larger battery can reduce charging frequency. Its stronger motor provides greater assistance when the box is loaded. Its wider tires are appropriate for less-than-perfect streets, while its two-seat cargo area covers the needs of many small and medium-sized families. Bunch offers more seats, but Addmotor provides more performance in the areas riders will notice every day. Unless a household routinely transports more than two children, the E-325’s combination of range, power, cargo flexibility, and price is difficult to overlook. Final Verdict The Bunch Original 4+ remains a compelling specialist choice for families that regularly need four belted passenger positions. It also has a higher total payload rating, lower bike weight, and fully assembled delivery. For most other buyers, the Addmotor E-325 is the stronger overall value. It provides more motor power, twice the stated torque, a much larger battery, longer claimed range, wider tires, and a far lower purchase price. Its two-seat front box is sufficient for many families and remains useful for groceries, pets, work supplies, and weekend outings. Bunch wins the seating-capacity contest. Addmotor wins the broader comparison for power, range, flexibility, and cost. Unless four passenger seats are essential, the E-325 is the cargo trike that makes more sense for real family life.

    Bunch Electric Cargo Bike vs. Addmotor E-325: Which One Fits Real Family Life Better?

    August 1, 2026

    How to Get a Driver’s License in Miami Florida

    August 1, 2026
    "Spider-Man: Brand New Day," 2026

    “Spider-Man: Brand New Day” A More Mature, Emotional Spidey Adventure [Review]

    July 31, 2026

    LEGO Introduces SMART Play Gateways & Several New Sets at SDCC 2026

    July 23, 2026

    Jason Alexander Apologizes For ‘Inappropriate’ Underaged Courtney Stodden Sketch

    July 22, 2026

    Mara Wilson Shares Her Thoughts on a Potential “Matilda” Sequel

    July 21, 2026

    Tubi Indie Spotlight: “Blood and Breakfast” by Mark Byrne

    August 1, 2026
    "Spider-Man: Brand New Day," 2026

    “Spider-Man: Brand New Day” A More Mature, Emotional Spidey Adventure [Review]

    July 31, 2026

    Madeline Brewer, Emory Cohen, Nicholas Alexander Chavez Cast in “Possession” Reboot

    July 30, 2026

    Charles Parnell, Marta Kessler, Caleb Dolden Join Cast of “The Conjuring: First Communion”

    July 30, 2026

    “American Idol” Renewed, Showcases Network TV Issues

    July 30, 2026

    Ryan Murphy Says “American Horror Story” Season 13 Brings Together All Previous Seasons

    July 29, 2026

    Mike Flanagan’s “Carrie” Series Gets Release Date, Teaser Trailer

    July 27, 2026

    It’s a Good Time to be a “Stranger Things” Fan With 10th Anniversary Merch

    July 17, 2026
    "Spider-Man: Brand New Day," 2026

    “Spider-Man: Brand New Day” A More Mature, Emotional Spidey Adventure [Review]

    July 31, 2026

    “The Odyssey” A Flawed But Staggering Spectacle of Scale and Scope [review]

    July 17, 2026

    “Gail Daughtry and the Celebrity Sex Pass” Wizard of Oz Meets Screwball Sex Comedy

    July 10, 2026
    Jackass

    “Jackass: Best and Last” A Swan Song for Nut Taps [review]

    June 27, 2026
    Check Out Our Latest
      • Product Reviews
      • Reviews
      • SDCC 2021
      • SDCC 2022
    Related Posts

    None found

    NERDBOT
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    Nerdbot is owned and operated by Nerds! If you have an idea for a story or a cool project send us a holler on Editors@Nerdbot.com.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.