Close Menu
NERDBOT
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    Subscribe
    NERDBOT
    • News
      • Reviews
    • Movies & TV
    • Comics
    • Gaming
    • Collectibles
    • Science & Tech
    • Culture
    • Nerd Voices
    • About Us
      • Join the Team at Nerdbot
    NERDBOT
    Home»Movies»The Sequel Mistakes of “Wonder Woman 1984” [Spoiler-Free Review]
    Movies

    The Sequel Mistakes of “Wonder Woman 1984” [Spoiler-Free Review]

    Derrick MurrayBy Derrick MurrayDecember 27, 20206 Mins Read
    Share
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Reddit WhatsApp Email

    I want to be very clear: I am acutely aware of the inherent ridiculousness of the Wonder Woman story. Even more so, I am aware that her rogue gallery is easily one of the most ridiculous (outside of the Justice League and actual gods) second to only the Flash. Let’s face it, her most famous foe is woman/cheetah hybrid. So I am not here to criticize “Wonder Woman 1984” on the merits of its realism, grounding, or lack there of.

    The film is bright and vibrant and perfectly 80s, which is completely fine. My issues with the highly anticipated film are much more in regards to tone, narrative, and overall composition of the film itself, and how it falls victim to just about every sequel folly you can commit. “Wonder Woman 1984” is plagued by these sequel missteps, and ends up being an overblown, imbalanced mess instead of a concise, heartfelt return to greatness.

    Bigger, Longer, and Uncut

    I don’t know why or how Hollywood hasn’t learned their lesson from this yet. The examples of going bigger, making things longer, and cramming every idea (both present and future) into a single film are endless. Countless sequels continue to do this and fail, and “Wonder Woman 1984” is no exception. Perhaps its biggest and most glaring misstep is the films length. Clocking in at two and half hours is just simply unnecessary, especially for the story that is being told. Truthfully, I’d venture to say 80% of the problem with “Wonder Woman 1984” is how long it takes to tell its story. By making the sequel almost twice as long as its predecessor, it leaves itself open for long lulls and narrative inconsistencies that simply can’t be overlooked. The same story can be told with 45-60 minutes cut from it, but the sequel curse dictates longer is better.

    This is exceptionally wrong for “Wonder Woman 1984” as its predecessor works BECAUSE it’s so concise and contained. While I understand wanting to expand the reach and scope of a god on earth, leaving nothing on the cutting room floor isn’t the way to do it. “Wonder Woman 1984” operates as if every idea is a good one. This is never the case, yet sequels push forward with this nevertheless. Because the film does this, it crumbles under the weight of its own sprawling narrative and excessive run time. By reaching beyond your narrative means, you’re left with a tonally imbalanced and over complicated story that simply doesn’t work, and takes us into our next big issue; tone.

    The Tonal Imbalance

    When every idea is a good idea and the run time seems to be never ending, not only does your story suffer as whole, but you’re left wide open for an extreme tonal imbalance. “Wonder Woman 1984” suffers from this in a major way, struggling to land on any particular tone despite is wild 80s setting. Look, you’re either “The Dark Knight” or “Thor: Ragnorok.” You cannot be both within the same film, and “Wonder Woman 1984″ desperately tries and fails.

    Setting the film in 80s is a terrific contrast to the WW1 period piece of the first one. Trading out the gloom and grays for bright and colorful fanny packs is a unique way to juxtapose the years and years that have passed between the two films. Making Wonder Woman more camp than serious is a contrast worth exploring, especially given the villains we are asking her to square off against. But “Wonder Woman 1984” doesn’t commit to this fully, opting to constantly shift between fantastical realism and silly 80s references. The audience is constantly asked to enjoy the magic and also believe in its realism. The constant tonal shifts in “Wonder Woman 1984” makes it impossible to accept either. It’s like Professor Hulk said, “either it’s all a joke or none of it is.”

    Asking the audience to accept that Max Lord (Pedro Pascal) as a larger than life, over the top, stereotypical, try and take over the world villain while also being a down to earth, struggling every man desperate to provide for his son is just downright unfair. We don’t need added humanity to a caricature. We are already given the complexity of characterization with Barbara Minerva (Kristen Wig) who is in conflict with her humanity and desire already. If you’re already willing to include horrible middle eastern stereotypes (a whole different issue I’m simply not getting into here) then you need to commit to villain, too.

    The Narrative Mess

    This leads us to the final, major problem with “Wonder Woman 1984.” When every idea is a good idea and your film is far too long in an attempt to include to accommodate them all, you sacrifice a straight forward narrative for a string of disconnected scenes. They are held together by the thinnest of story, most of which leaves the audience with more questions than answers. We can’t put all the pieces together because the film doesn’t really let you.

    Yes, there are absolutely stand outs and things that work. The chemistry between Gadot and Pine is damn near perfect. Kristen Wig’s turn as a dramatic villain is one of the films strength. There are some solid action sequences that put the wonder in Wonder Woman. There is heart and purpose buried in here that sometimes comes across.

    And yes, Pedro Pascal hamming it up is just downright fun. But all of these things are singular and disconnected in the context of them film as a whole. We are asked to the connect the dots that never make a full picture. “Wonder Woman 1984” wants to do too much at once and ends up doing nothing overall.

    Additionally, even if you were to cut a majority of the film and give a more straight forward narrative, the editing and pacing is still all over the place. The opening of the film on Themyscura proceeded by a “Superman III” montage is so disjointed and jarring, viewers are left constantly feeling like you’re watching two or three movies at once. Max Lord not given any backstory or motivation outside of world domination until the third act is simply baffling from a narrative standpoint, especially when you consider the fact that its those very motivations that quite literally bring about the film’s bizarre resolution. Not being clear on your own magic creates a whirlwind of problems surrounding wishing, Steve Trevor, and Wonder Woman’s own hero’s journey.

    This film feels stuck, desperately trying to move the story forward but never getting out of its own way to do so. Its tonally imbalanced, narratively messy, and simply too long to be fully enjoyed. What’s truly disappointing is that there is s a good movie buried in here somewhere, but by committing too many sequel mistakes, “Wonder Woman 1984″ simply can’t make the good shine them.

    Do You Want to Know More?

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Email
    Previous ArticleMcDonald’s Introduced Burger with Spam and Oreo Crumbs
    Next Article Ryan Reynolds Reacts to New “Green Lantern” Drink Using Aviation Gin
    Derrick Murray
    • Website
    • Facebook
    • X (Twitter)
    • Instagram

    Derrick Murray is a Los Angeles based stand up comedian, writer, and co-host for The Jack of All Nerds Show.

    Related Posts

    Tubi Indie Spotlight: “Blood and Breakfast” by Mark Byrne

    August 1, 2026
    "Spider-Man: Brand New Day," 2026

    “Spider-Man: Brand New Day” A More Mature, Emotional Spidey Adventure [Review]

    July 31, 2026

    Madeline Brewer, Emory Cohen, Nicholas Alexander Chavez Cast in “Possession” Reboot

    July 30, 2026

    Charles Parnell, Marta Kessler, Caleb Dolden Join Cast of “The Conjuring: First Communion”

    July 30, 2026

    Mike Flanagan Will Write & Produce The Henry Cavill-led “Warhammer 40k”

    July 30, 2026

    Jacob Tremblay to Play Ted Kaczynski in Netflix’s “Unabomber” Film

    July 29, 2026
    • Latest
    • News
    • Movies
    • TV
    • Reviews
    AI Prompt Generator: Why Effective Prompts Are Shaping the Future of Artificial Intelligence

    AI Prompt Generator: Why Effective Prompts Are Shaping the Future of Artificial Intelligence

    August 1, 2026
    Why the MaxFoot MF-33 Electric Tricycle Frame Deserves More Attention

    Why the MaxFoot MF-33 Electric Tricycle Frame Deserves More Attention

    August 1, 2026
    Buying a family cargo bike is different from buying a recreational e-bike. A front-load cargo trike may be expected to transport children, groceries, school bags, pets, and other heavy items several times a day. Motor reserve, battery capacity, braking hardware, passenger protection, and overall value therefore matter more than brand recognition alone. The Bunch Original 4+ and Addmotor E-325 are both front-loading electric cargo trikes with two wheels at the front and one at the rear. Both keep children or cargo visible while riding, and both use hydraulic disc brakes, torque-sensing pedal assistance, seven-speed Shimano drivetrains, and a 20 mph top speed. Their priorities, however, are noticeably different. Bunch offers more passenger seats and a polished premium ownership experience. Addmotor offers stronger performance, a larger battery, longer range, wider tires, and a substantially lower price. For many households, the E-325 therefore looks less like the budget alternative and more like the practical one. Bunch Original 4+ vs. Addmotor E-325 Specifications Category Addmotor E-325 Bunch Original 4+ Motor 750W rear hub, 1,400W peak 500W DAPU geared hub Maximum Torque 90Nm 45Nm Battery 48V 20Ah Samsung, 960Wh 48V 12.8Ah LG, 614Wh Claimed Range 60+ miles in PAS 1 20–30 miles Top Speed 20 mph 20 mph Total Payload 550 lbs 600 lbs Front Box Capacity 250 lbs 400 lbs Passenger Seats Two cushioned seats Four belted seats Tires 20 × 2.4 front / 24 × 3.0 rear 20 × 2.15 front / 24 × 2.0 rear Bike Weight Approximately 198 lbs 168 lbs Listed Price $3,699 $6,499 The current manufacturer listings confirm the major differences in battery size, motor output, seating capacity, range, payload, and price. How Many Passenger Seats Do You Really Need? The clearest advantage of the Bunch Original 4+ is its four-seat passenger box. It includes front and rear benches with four three-point seat belts, while its cargo area is rated for up to 400 pounds. Families that regularly transport three or four children may find this layout difficult to replace. The E-325 has two cushioned passenger seats and two seat belts. Its front box is rated for 250 pounds, while its overall payload limit is 550 pounds. That is below the Bunch bike’s 600-pound total rating, but it remains substantial for ordinary family use. The practical question is not which trike has the highest theoretical capacity. It is how many seats will actually be used every week. A family with one or two children gains little from paying for four positions. The E-325’s 36-inch-long, 25-inch-wide, and 23-inch-high box still provides generous room for children, pets, shopping bags, and daily supplies. Bunch is the logical choice when four seats are essential. For households carrying one child, two children, or a mixture of passengers and cargo, the E-325 offers the more balanced layout. More Motor Reserve for Real Loads Cargo trikes become demanding when starting from a stop, climbing a hill, or moving through an intersection with a loaded box. A motor that feels adequate during an empty test ride can feel far weaker after passengers and groceries are added. The Bunch Original 4+ uses a 500W motor producing 45Nm of torque. The Addmotor E-325 uses a 750W rear-mounted motor rated for up to 1,400W peak output and 90Nm of torque. That gives the Addmotor twice the stated torque. Because both trikes are limited to 20 mph, the stronger E-325 motor is not mainly about chasing speed. Its real benefit is additional reserve at lower speeds. More torque can make loaded starts feel less strained, reduce rider effort on inclines, and help maintain momentum in stop-and-go traffic. This matters in hilly neighborhoods and suburban areas where destinations are farther apart. A family cargo trike is already a heavy machine before anyone climbs aboard. Choosing the stronger drive system leaves more room for passengers and cargo without making the trike feel immediately overwhelmed. A Larger Battery Makes Daily Use Easier The Bunch Original 4+ has a 614Wh battery and a published range of 20 to 30 miles depending on terrain and load. The E-325 uses a 960Wh Samsung battery and is rated for more than 60 miles under PAS 1 conditions. Real-world range will vary with passenger weight, hills, weather, throttle use, speed, tire pressure, and assist level. Even so, battery capacity is objective: the E-325 stores approximately 56 percent more energy. That extra capacity matters even when the rider never attempts a 60-mile journey. It may allow several school runs and errands between charges while providing more breathing room when plans change. A parent can add a grocery stop or park visit without immediately worrying about returning home with a nearly empty battery. The Bunch range may be sufficient for short neighborhood routines. The Addmotor battery is better suited to riders who want their cargo trike to replace more car trips and who do not want charging to become a daily obligation. Wider Tires for Imperfect Neighborhood Roads The E-325 uses 20 × 2.4-inch front tires and a 24 × 3.0-inch rear tire. The Bunch Original 4+ uses 20 × 2.15-inch front tires and a 24 × 2.0-inch rear tire. Wider tires can add cushioning and create a larger contact area on imperfect pavement. They will not turn the E-325 into an off-road vehicle, but they can make cracks, patched asphalt, driveway transitions, and rough neighborhood streets feel less harsh. The wider rear tire also suits the stronger rear-mounted motor and the weight carried through the back of the trike. Both models use hydraulic disc brakes and include parking brakes. Addmotor specifies 180mm brake rotors on all three wheels. The E-325 also combines a mid-axis torque sensor with seven pedal-assist levels, allowing the motor response to feel more natural and controllable while carrying passengers. These are not glamorous features, but they affect nearly every journey. Parents need predictable braking when approaching intersections, while a parking brake helps prevent a loaded trike from rolling as children enter or leave the cargo box. The Price Difference Is Difficult to Ignore The Bunch Original 4+ is currently listed at $6,499, while the Addmotor E-325 is listed at $3,699. That creates a price difference of $2,800. Bunch partly justifies its premium with four-passenger seating, full UL 2271 and UL 2849 compliance, fully assembled delivery, and a strong family-cargo service model. Buyers who specifically need those benefits may accept the higher price. However, the E-325 does not exchange its lower price for entry-level hardware. It offers the stronger motor, twice the stated torque, a 960Wh Samsung battery, torque-sensing assistance, three-wheel hydraulic brakes, wider tires, a reinforced composite cargo box, and a two-year warranty. For a family that only needs two passenger seats, the Bunch premium becomes difficult to defend. The $2,800 difference could cover helmets, high-quality locks, weather equipment, maintenance, insurance, and accessories while still leaving money unspent. A premium cargo bike should provide benefits that match the buyer’s actual routine. Paying more for unused passenger seats does not improve the school run, increase range, or make a hill easier to climb. Which Cargo Trike Is Easier to Live With? The best family vehicle is not necessarily the one with the longest feature list. It is the one that removes the most inconvenience from everyday life. The E-325’s larger battery can reduce charging frequency. Its stronger motor provides greater assistance when the box is loaded. Its wider tires are appropriate for less-than-perfect streets, while its two-seat cargo area covers the needs of many small and medium-sized families. Bunch offers more seats, but Addmotor provides more performance in the areas riders will notice every day. Unless a household routinely transports more than two children, the E-325’s combination of range, power, cargo flexibility, and price is difficult to overlook. Final Verdict The Bunch Original 4+ remains a compelling specialist choice for families that regularly need four belted passenger positions. It also has a higher total payload rating, lower bike weight, and fully assembled delivery. For most other buyers, the Addmotor E-325 is the stronger overall value. It provides more motor power, twice the stated torque, a much larger battery, longer claimed range, wider tires, and a far lower purchase price. Its two-seat front box is sufficient for many families and remains useful for groceries, pets, work supplies, and weekend outings. Bunch wins the seating-capacity contest. Addmotor wins the broader comparison for power, range, flexibility, and cost. Unless four passenger seats are essential, the E-325 is the cargo trike that makes more sense for real family life.

    Bunch Electric Cargo Bike vs. Addmotor E-325: Which One Fits Real Family Life Better?

    August 1, 2026

    How to Get a Driver’s License in Miami Florida

    August 1, 2026
    "Spider-Man: Brand New Day," 2026

    “Spider-Man: Brand New Day” A More Mature, Emotional Spidey Adventure [Review]

    July 31, 2026

    LEGO Introduces SMART Play Gateways & Several New Sets at SDCC 2026

    July 23, 2026

    Jason Alexander Apologizes For ‘Inappropriate’ Underaged Courtney Stodden Sketch

    July 22, 2026

    Mara Wilson Shares Her Thoughts on a Potential “Matilda” Sequel

    July 21, 2026

    Tubi Indie Spotlight: “Blood and Breakfast” by Mark Byrne

    August 1, 2026
    "Spider-Man: Brand New Day," 2026

    “Spider-Man: Brand New Day” A More Mature, Emotional Spidey Adventure [Review]

    July 31, 2026

    Madeline Brewer, Emory Cohen, Nicholas Alexander Chavez Cast in “Possession” Reboot

    July 30, 2026

    Charles Parnell, Marta Kessler, Caleb Dolden Join Cast of “The Conjuring: First Communion”

    July 30, 2026

    “American Idol” Renewed, Showcases Network TV Issues

    July 30, 2026

    Ryan Murphy Says “American Horror Story” Season 13 Brings Together All Previous Seasons

    July 29, 2026

    Mike Flanagan’s “Carrie” Series Gets Release Date, Teaser Trailer

    July 27, 2026

    It’s a Good Time to be a “Stranger Things” Fan With 10th Anniversary Merch

    July 17, 2026
    "Spider-Man: Brand New Day," 2026

    “Spider-Man: Brand New Day” A More Mature, Emotional Spidey Adventure [Review]

    July 31, 2026

    “The Odyssey” A Flawed But Staggering Spectacle of Scale and Scope [review]

    July 17, 2026

    “Gail Daughtry and the Celebrity Sex Pass” Wizard of Oz Meets Screwball Sex Comedy

    July 10, 2026
    Jackass

    “Jackass: Best and Last” A Swan Song for Nut Taps [review]

    June 27, 2026
    Check Out Our Latest
      • Product Reviews
      • Reviews
      • SDCC 2021
      • SDCC 2022
    Related Posts

    None found

    NERDBOT
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    Nerdbot is owned and operated by Nerds! If you have an idea for a story or a cool project send us a holler on Editors@Nerdbot.com.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.