Close Menu
NERDBOT
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    Subscribe
    NERDBOT
    • News
      • Reviews
    • Movies & TV
    • Comics
    • Gaming
    • Collectibles
    • Science & Tech
    • Culture
    • Nerd Voices
    • About Us
      • Join the Team at Nerdbot
    NERDBOT
    Home»Nerd Culture»Fads From the Past (That Got Banned at Schools)
    Nerd Culture

    Fads From the Past (That Got Banned at Schools)

    Breana CeballosBy Breana CeballosJuly 23, 201813 Mins Read
    Share
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Reddit WhatsApp Email

    Growing up going to public school you always have something that is “in” that every kid has to have. There have been many things that become popular and then phase out of existence. Sometimes the action of having a teacher take away a precious item burns us so that we never forget. We become more secretive and then begin to covet our toys or games or whatever the case may be. I discovered, or more likely realized that there are really only 4 reasons that something is banned or taken away. Here are some of the reasons why along with some of the most popular bans from childhood. I surveyed the Nerdbot writers as well as some readers and this is what I came up with.

    Current list of things not to bring to school, How would you even fit a television in your backpack?

    Dress Code/Distractions

    7) Spaghetti Straps

    Everyone wanted to be like Buffy in the 90’s

    When I was growing up it was the 90’s/ early 00’s and spaghetti straps were just becoming a thing. Partly in thanks to Sarah Michelle Geller of Buffy who made these looks super popular. Spaghetti Straps, chunky highlights and platform shoes were the entirety of seventh and eighth grade. This is one of the ones that parents were even upset about, especially in summer when their daughters could potentially overheat. This one is still in effect today with a tank strap needing to be 2 3/4 inches wide, or wide enough to cover a bra strap. You know so the boys don’t get distracted…

    6) JNCO Jeans

    If you couldn’t wear them to school then, they are making a comeback now

    At the height of the Rave scene this brand was everywhere. I remember when you could walk into a Hot Topic and there would be System of a Down glow in the dark Tees of the Kombucha Mushroom People and JNCO’s in every style you could imagine. As far as the styles go there would have been some with reflective tape, more bondage looking ones or just plain jeans. I can still hear the sound of my JNCO’s sloshing because the soaked up the water from the rain fall the night before on the walk to school. After I left high school and did alternative school, because yeah I ditched and it made people worried for my future, they were banned from Orange County school districts. Especially because baggie clothing made people nervous after the whole Columbine thing. Kids were outraged at the ban claiming self expression but as an adult now I can see why they did it. It’s all a matter of perspective.

    5) White Shirts and Colored Shoelaces

    The cool way to lace your shoes pictured here

    It seems no matter what district you live in there is always a fear of gang affiliation and in turn representation. I remember when I started high school I wanted to wear my orange striped ADIDAS with red shoe laces. I learned the first day that I wore those that it was considered a white supremacy thing. I had no idea, I was just mad because I bought those because it looked cool. It was ok though because I ended up buying skull and crossbones laces instead. White shirts were another thing that got banned because of the potential gang affiliation thing. I guess they were afraid of the kids wanting to look like “thugs” from the music videos because kids like to imitate what they see on tv.

    4) Slap Bracelets

    Slap Happy

    Technically this is a toy but it also constitutes fashion so its going in this part of the list. The funny thing with this being banned is that it was initially designed by a teacher! Wisconsin teacher Stuart Anders designed and sold these in the 80’s and while they were deemed a fad they never went away. People were worried that the kids would slap it too hard and injure themselves.

    3) Jelly Bracelets

    Secret Meanings

    These were popular while I was in school but it was mostly because Gwen Stefani wore them and I was way into No Doubt. After I graduated I remember hearing on the news that schools were banning them because kids had decided that the different colors meant that you would perform or had performed different sexual acts.

    2) Gel Pens

    Just don’t draw a dick on your face and we’ll call it good

    In middle school these were literally everywhere. They were banned because kids wouldn’t just write on their papers with them but also on any part of their body where skin showed. Face, Arms, sometimes breasts would be drawn on with words or art. While I preferred to just draw anime on people a lot of other students would make more lewd illustrations(dicks basically) and got the attention of the faculty.

    1) Pagers

    Can you please quit paging 911? Your Stoner needs are not my emergency

    So I’m dating myself here. Pagers(sometimes called a beeper) were banned because they were not only distracting but also for dealing drugs. Or so they thought, and you know what they weren’t wrong. The trick was to keep it on vibrate and use the pay phone between classes and not “be a bust” about it. It kind of hurt my feelings a little it was so hard to find a good picture for this because I guess they were advertised before internet marketing was a thing.

    Candy/Food

    4) Gum

    Tried to think of a good joke about chewing gum and being “Extra” but couldn’t think of one

    Gum was banned for being a complete nuisance. While it was great to keep the antsy kids quiet during class it was also a mess. Sticking it on the bottom of your desk was seen as a “rebel” thing to do, along with the loud popping of bubbles. Plus there was always a risk someone would think it was funny to put it in your hair.

     

    2) Candy Cigarettes

    Ok, yeah I see why these got banned..

    This was another thing that schools banned because they were worried that it would promote the use of drugs. Or rather make smoking look cool. You could blow through the stick and make it look like smoke was coming out before you chewed it up into gum. Since D.A.R.E. and the anti tobacco ads were strong it’s no wonder these were abolished. Though you could still buy them from the ice cream man and enjoy(?) them in your own home. I say enjoy with a question mark because I don’t remember them tasting good, at all.

    2) Warheads

    I wouldn’t google “warheads burn tongue” in an image search.

    Warheads were banned in school’s after kids started challenging each other to see how many you could eat at one time. The sour on the candy was not gentle and would essentially burn your taste buds. Kids wouldn’t stop trying to one up each other and this caused major issues causing damage to their tongues. Oh, and if you image search that, don’t say I didn’t warn you.

    1) Raven’s Revenge

    Sure does make me want to go out and do drugs. How about you?

    This candy would turn your whole mouth black! This was one of the candies that schools banned due to the candy coming in a vial container. The thinking behind this one is that it would promote wanting to use drugs. Probably because LSD was known to come in a vial as well other drugs such as cocaine. This candy was totally awesome though and you know what the best part is? In 2012 it came back! Still banned in schools I’m sure but you can now buy it on Amazon so FU school, I’m eating it at home.

    Toys (Gambling)

    2) POGS

    I had a weird connection to the Mighty Ducks, and that Unicorn Slammer? My favorite <3

    POGS were everywhere in the 90’s. You could get them from Del Taco, Knott’s had a whole attraction based on them and there were themed POGS for every show or movie you can think of. The picture above is from my own collection, what has survived the years. The reason for this one becoming a problem in school was mainly because of the game play. You stacked them up and used a “slammer” to get the POGS in the stack to land face up. whatever lands face up you got to keep. I was never very good at the game but did like to collect them and I know a few kids who would be really upset that they lost one of their favorites. The trick was to take only the ones you didn’t like to school but kids were proud and wanted to show off their good ones.

    1) Cards, Cards, and More Cards

    I always had some type of Sailor Moon Card on me at all times

    Playing cards depended on the school. Sure you could gamble with them potentially but if you just wanted to play gin rummy with your friends at recess in the shade that was OK. As long as you weren’t outright gambling. This is still mentioned on lists of things to leave at home though.

    I still have some loose ones in the attic but I didn’t feel like digging them out Pokemon cards were a huge hit among the kids in school. Like I said in my article about trading cards everyone had at least one. Kids would trade, play and win or just give them to a friend. The problem with them giving them away was that some of the kids would give away a high value card and then the parents would freak out. Or in the case I witnessed the most kids would play to win and then lose a precious card and freak out and tell their mom.

    Looks satanic to me… uh

    One of my friends let me in on this on and it is still banned today though I wonder if it is for the same reasons. The game play is one where winning a card isn’t really a rule of thumb but if you want to gamble or set up a game where there are stakes it’s not unheard of. The reason my friend gave me for the banning of this game wasn’t that it was for gambling but because schools were worried that it was “Satanic”. Which honestly if I heard that it was banned for being Satanic would have totally gotten me into it.

    Toys (Distraction/Potential Injury)

    6) Beyblades

    Looks like it could hurt, not gonna lie

    In 2003 a parent was hit in the eye by a Beyblade. While it seems funny to someone it hasn’t happened to I am sure that it hurt like hell. I just get flashbacks to when that freaking sky-dancer bruised me in the face. Hard plastic objects that you fling with a plastic ring sounds all around like a big hurt waiting to happen.

    5) Slime

    Sensory Fun! and a distraction

    Slime was banned in 2017 because kids would play with it in class and it would become a huge distraction. Also depending on how it was made it could potentially make a mess or stain the wood of the school desks. Students were having a hard time focusing because they were just playing with slime all the time. I do seem to remember GAK being frowned upon when I went to school but it was never outright banned.

    4) Fidget Spinners

    Hypnotizing

    Same concept, distracting. Students were becoming obsessed with these things as many kids do when there is a cool new thing. The only real connection to these that I have is that my three year old would watch people play with them on YouTube so I don’t have a whole lot of knowledge as to why they are so special.

    3) Tech Decks

    Super realistic down to the grip on top, AND you could Ollie!

    Tech Decks I can tell you a little more about and in my mind I relate them to the fidget spinner. These were all the craze in seventh grade til they got banned. To clarify seventh grade for me was 1998. They made all kinds of accessories for these teeny tiny skateboards and they were super popular among the skater crowd. Because if you couldn’t actually be skating, you could show that you were thinking about landing your next trick by fingering(uh huh huh) these sweet boards.

    2) Tamagotchi

    Beep Boop, Beep Boop

    In elementary school, sixth grade 1997, these things hit the kids like I never saw before. This was the first ever digital pet that you could take care of. Play games and raise it’s happiness. Flush its hershey kiss shaped poop away and keep it feeling loved. These things were hot. My Nana, rest her soul, stood in line for hours getting one of these for my brother and I when they launched. Somehow she was always in the know if something was in. Anyway, these little egg babies were such an annoyance in school that they banned them. They beeped when they needed attention like if they pooped or were getting hungry or sad, and me and most of the others in my class, intellectuals, didn’t realize that they had a silent option. So that meant when they were banned my mom got to take care of them because we would throw them in her purse before school.

    1) Gameboys/Gaming Watches

    Could not stop playing Pokemon. I Still hear phantom sounds of a wild Pokemon appearing.

    Going along with the Pokemon craze every kid I hung out with toted along a gameboy so that they could catch and play Pokemon red or blue between classes. Games are not new to being banned, especially electronic games like those cool watches you could get with Zelda or Dick Tracy programmed into them. But gameboys were everywhere and were becoming a big problem for teachers, as well as parents. I remember being scolded because I played the game while eating dinner, because I am an addict when it comes to a good game. A lot of other kids had the same problem playing it during class and for that reason teachers began confiscating them left and right with the only way to get them back was with a parents note and on a Friday.

    I know this is long and I probably left out a bunch of stuff but these are the main things I remember from growing up. I want to know what you have to say. Did any of these things affect you? Did you get anything taken away from you that you loved? Did you have bans on anything in your school that I didn’t cover?

    Tell NerdBot in the comments and get the discussion rolling!

    Or you can always Tweet at me! I love to discuss anything nerdy and I love exchanging stories.

     

     

     

    Do You Want to Know More?

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Email
    Previous ArticleTop 10 Most (Terrifying) Fictional Moms
    Next Article We’re Still Wondering If The Aquaman Trailer Was Worth The Wait
    Breana Ceballos
    • Website

    Anime enthusiast, Hearthstone Battleground addict.

    Related Posts

    Man Builds Giant Sword for Excavator in Viral DIY Video

    March 31, 2026

    Thieves Manage to Steal Truck With 12 Tons of KitKat Bars

    March 30, 2026

    How Flooded Homes Begin to Change in the Days Following the Incident

    March 30, 2026

    Possmei Popping Boba Tea Drink Review: Fruity Oolong and Green Tea Energy in a Can

    March 26, 2026

    Leinenkugel’s High Shore Shandy is Perfect for Summer Sipping

    March 26, 2026

    Stephen Colbert to Co-Write Upcoming Lord of the Rings FIlm

    March 25, 2026
    • Latest
    • News
    • Movies
    • TV
    • Reviews
    Most studios searching for a match-3 level design company are looking for five different things. Some need levels built from scratch, others require a live game rebalanced before churn compounds, and some demand a content pipeline that won't fall behind. These are different problems, and they map to multiple types of companies. The mistake most studios make is treating "match-3 level design" as a single service category and evaluating every company against the same criteria. A specialist who excels at diagnosing retention problems in live games is the wrong hire for a studio that needs 300 levels built in 2 months. A full-cycle agency that builds from concept to launch isn't the right call for a publisher who already has engineering and art in place and just needs the level design layer covered. This guide maps 7 companies for match-3 level design services to the specific problem each one is built to solve. Find your problem first. The right company follows from there. What Match-3 Level Design Services Cover The term "level design" gets used loosely in this market, and this causes bad hires. A studio that excels at building levels from scratch operates dissimilarly from one that diagnoses why a live game's difficulty curve is losing players (even if both describe their service the same way on a website). Match-3 level design breaks into four distinct services, each requiring different expertise, different tooling, and a different type of partner. Level production — designing and building playable levels configured to a game's mechanics, obstacle set, and difficulty targets. This is what most studios mean when they say they need a level design partner, and it's the service with the widest range of quality in the market. Difficulty balancing and rebalancing — using win rates, attempt counts, and churn data to calibrate difficulty across hundreds of levels. Plus, this includes adjusting live content when the data shows a problem. Studios that only do level production typically don't offer this. Studios that do it well treat it as a standalone service. Live-ops level design covers the ongoing content pipeline a live match-3 game requires after launch (seasonal events, new level batches, limited-time challenges) sustained at volume and consistent in quality. This is a throughput and process problem as much as a design problem. Full-cycle development bundles level design inside a complete production engagement: mechanics, art, engineering, monetization, QA, and launch. Level design is one function among many. Depth varies by studio. Knowing which service you need before you evaluate a single company cuts the list in half and prevents the most common mistake in this market: hiring a full-cycle agency to solve a level design problem, or hiring a specialist to build a product from scratch. The List of Companies for Match-3 Level Design Services The companies below were selected based on verified credentials, named shipped titles where available, and the specific service each one is built to deliver. They are ranked by how well their capabilities match the service types outlined above. A specialist who does one thing exceptionally well sits above a generalist who does many things adequately. SolarSpark | Pure-play match-3 level design specialist SolarSpark is a remote-first studio built exclusively around casual puzzle game production. With 7+ years in the genre and 2,000+ levels shipped across live titles including Monopoly Match, Matchland, and KitchenMasters, it is the only company on this list that does nothing but match-3 level design. Level design services: Level production, difficulty curve planning, fail-rate balancing, obstacle and booster logic design, live-ops pipeline, competitor benchmarking, product audit and retention diagnostic. Verdict: The strongest pure specialist on this list. When level design is the specific constraint, SolarSpark is the right choice. What they do well: Every level is built around difficulty curves, fail/win balance, obstacle sequencing, and booster logic, measured against targets before delivery. Competitor benchmarking is available as a standalone service, mapping your game's difficulty curve and monetization structure against current top performers with specific, actionable output. Where they fit: Studios with a live or in-development game that need a dedicated level design pipeline, a retention diagnostic, or a one-off audit before soft launch. Honest caveat: SolarSpark does not handle art, engineering, or full-cycle development. Logic Simplified | Unity-first development with analytics and monetization built in Logic Simplified specializes in Unity-powered casual and puzzle games, with match-3 explicitly in their service portfolio. Operating for over a decade with clients across multiple countries, the studio positions itself around data-informed development: analytics, A/B testing, and monetization are integrated into the production process. Level design services: Level production, difficulty progression design, obstacle and blocker placement, booster and power-up integration, A/B tested level balancing, customer journey mapping applied to level flow. Verdict: A credible full-cycle option for studios that want analytics and monetization treated as design inputs from day one, not as post-launch additions. What they do well: Logic Simplified builds analytics and player behavior tracking into the design process. Their Unity expertise is deep, and their stated MVP timeline of approximately three months is competitive at their price point. India-based rates make full-cycle development accessible without requiring a Western agency budget. Where they fit: Studios building a first match-3 title that needs the full production chain handled by a single vendor, with analytics built in from the start. Honest caveat: No publicly named match-3 titles with verifiable App Store links appear in their portfolio. Ask for specific live game references and retention data during the first conversation before committing. Cubix | US-based full-cycle match-3 development with fixed-cost engagement Cubix is a California-based game development company with a dedicated match-3 service line covering level design, tile behavior, booster systems, obstacles, UI/UX, and full production on Unity and Unreal Engine. 30+ in-house animators can cover the full scope of puzzle game production. Level design services: Level production, combo and difficulty balancing, blocker and locked tile placement, move-limit challenge design, booster and power-up integration, scoring system design. Verdict: A viable full-cycle option for studios that need a Western-based partner with transparent fixed-cost pricing and documented match-3 capability. What they do well: Cubix covers the full production chain in one engagement, with strong visual production backed by an in-house animation team. Their fixed-cost model is a practical differentiator for studios that have been burned by scope creep on previous outsourcing contracts. Staff augmentation is also available for studios that need talent to plug into an existing pipeline. Where they fit: Studios that want a US-based full-cycle partner with predictable budgets, cross-platform delivery across iOS, Android, browsers, and PC, and a single vendor to own the concept through launch. Honest caveat: Named shipped match-3 titles are not prominently listed in their public portfolio. This is a verification gap worth closing during vetting, not a disqualifier on its own. Galaxy4Games | Data-driven match-3 development with published retention case studies Galaxy4Games is a game development studio with 15+ years of operating history, building mobile and cross-platform games across casual, RPG, and arcade genres. Match-3 is a named service line. What distinguishes them from most studios on this list is a level of public transparency about retention data. Their case studies document real D1 and D7 numbers from shipped titles. Level design services: Level production, difficulty curve development, booster and obstacle design, progression system design, LiveOps level content, A/B testing integration, analytics-based balancing. Verdict: The most transparent full-cycle option in terms of real retention data. For studios that want to see numbers before they hire, Galaxy4Games offers evidence most studios keep private. What they do well: Their Puzzle Fight case study documents D1 retention growing to 30% through iteration. Their modular system reduces development time and costs through reusable components, and their LiveOps infrastructure covers analytics, event management, and content updates as a planned post-launch function. Where they fit: Studios that need a data-informed full-cycle match-3 partner and want to evaluate a studio's methodology through published results. Honest caveat: Galaxy4Games covers a broad genre range (casual, RPG, arcade, educational, and Web3), which means match-3 is one of several service lines rather than a primary focus. Zatun | Award-winning level design and production studio with 18 years of operating history Zatun is an indie game studio and work-for-hire partner operating since 2007, with game level design listed as a dedicated named service alongside full-cycle development, art production, and co-development. With 250+ game titles and 300+ clients across AAA studios and indie teams, this agency has one of the longest track records. Level design services: Level production, difficulty progression design, level pacing and goal mapping, game design documentation, Unity level design, Unreal level design, level concept art. Verdict: A reliable, experienced production partner with a long track record and genuine level design depth. What they do well: Zatun's level design service covers difficulty progression, pacing maps, goal documentation, and execution in Unity and Unreal. Their 18 years of operation across 250+ titles gives them a reference library of what works across genres. Their work-for-hire model means they can step in at specific production stages without requiring ownership of the full project. Where they fit: Studios that need a specific level design or art production function covered without a full project handoff. This can be useful for teams mid-production that need additional capacity on a defined scope. Honest caveat: No publicly named match-3 titles appear in Zatun's portfolio, their verified work spans AAA and strategy genres; match-3 specific experience should be confirmed directly before engaging. Gamecrio | Full-cycle mobile match-3 development with AI-driven difficulty adaptation Gamecrio is a mobile game development studio with offices in India and the UK, covering match-3 development as an explicit service line alongside VR, arcade, casino, and web-based game development. Their stated differentiator within match-3 is AI-driven difficulty adaptation. Thus, levels adjust based on player skill. Level design services: Level production, AI-driven difficulty adaptation, booster and power-up design, progression system design, obstacle balancing, social and competitive feature integration, monetization-integrated level design. Verdict: An accessible full-cycle option with a technically interesting differentiator in AI-driven balancing. What they do well: Gamecrio builds monetization architecture into the level design process: IAP placement, rewarded ad integration, battle passes, and subscription models are considered alongside difficulty curves and obstacle sequencing. The AI-driven difficulty adaptation is a genuine technical capability that more established studios in this market have been slower to implement. Where they fit: Early-stage studios that need a full-cycle match-3 build with monetization designed in from the first level. Honest caveat: No publicly named shipped match-3 titles are listed on their site — request live App Store links and verifiable retention data before committing to any engagement. Juego Studios | Full-cycle and co-development partner with puzzle genre credentials and flexible engagement entry points Founded in 2013, Juego Studios is a global full-cycle game development and co-development partner with offices in India, USA, UK, and KSA. With 250+ delivered projects and clients including Disney, Sony, and Tencent, the studio covers game development, game art, and LiveOps across genres. Battle Gems is their verifiable genre credential. Level design services: Level production, difficulty balancing, progression system design, booster and mechanic integration, LiveOps level content, milestone-based level delivery, co-development level design support. Verdict: A well-resourced, credible full-cycle partner with a flexible engagement model that reduces the risk of committing to the wrong studio. What they do well: Juego's engagement model is flexible: studios can start with a risk-free 2-week test sprint, then scale to 20+ team members across modules without recruitment overhead. Three engagement models (outstaffing, dedicated teams, and managed outsourcing) let publishers choose how much control they retain versus how much they hand off. LiveOps is a named service line covering analytics-driven content updates and retention optimization after launch. Where they fit: Studios that need a full-cycle or co-development partner for a match-3 build and want to test the relationship before committing to full project scope. Honest caveat: Puzzle and match-3 are part of a broad genre portfolio that also spans VR, Web3, and enterprise simulations. How to Use This List The seven companies above cover the full range of what the match-3 level design market offers in 2026. The quality range is real, and the right choice depends on which service type matches the problem you're trying to solve. If your game is live and retention is the problem, you need a specialist who can diagnose and fix a difficulty curve. If you're building from zero and need art, engineering, and level design bundled, a full-cycle partner is the right call and the specialist is the wrong one. The honest caveat pattern across several entries in this list reflects a real market condition: verified, named match-3 credentials are rarer than studios' self-descriptions suggest. The companies that couldn't point to a live title with an App Store link were flagged honestly. Asking for live game references, retention data, and a first conversation before any commitment are things you can do before signing with any studio on this list.

    The Roland VG3: A Compact Powerhouse for Professional Print & Cut

    April 1, 2026
    Affordable Section 8 Living: Browse Houses & Apartments Easily

    Affordable Section 8 Living: Browse Houses & Apartments Easily

    April 1, 2026
    The True Value of Comprehensive Fire Protection

    The Fire Protection Weak Spot in Sydney’s Older Buildings

    April 1, 2026

    Carbon Craft Elegance: The Emergence of Modern Carbon Fiber Watches

    April 1, 2026
    "Life of a Showgirl," 2025

    Taylor Swift Sued Over Trademark For “The Life of a Showgirl”

    March 30, 2026

    Best Movies in March 2026: Hidden Gems and Quick Reviews

    March 29, 2026

    Mark Wahlberg Launches 4AM Club Challenge YouTube Series

    March 26, 2026
    "The Shrouds," 2024

    “The Shrouds,” SeeMeRot, & The History of Corpse Cameras

    March 25, 2026

    Big Trouble in Little China Gets an Honest Trailer Makeover

    March 31, 2026

    Gina Gershon Turned Down a Role in “Friday the 13th Part 2”

    March 31, 2026
    Nas "Hip Hop Is Dead," 2006

    Nas Will Produce Eli Roth’s New Movie “Ice Cream Man”

    March 31, 2026

    The Housemaid Sequel Confirms Potentially Horrible Release Date

    March 30, 2026

    SNL Ryan Gosling Wedding Traditions Skit Is His Funniest Yet

    March 31, 2026
    “Malcolm in the Middle: Life’s Still Unfair,” 2026

    “Malcolm in the Middle” Could Get a Full-Fledged Reboot

    March 30, 2026

    Survivor 50 Episode 6 Predictions: Who Will Be Voted Off Next?

    March 27, 2026

    “Star Trek: Starfleet Academy” to End With 2nd Season

    March 23, 2026

    Best Movies in March 2026: Hidden Gems and Quick Reviews

    March 29, 2026

    “They Will Kill You” A Violent, Blood-Splattering Good Time [review]

    March 24, 2026

    “Project Hail Mary” Familiar But Triumphant Sci-Fi Adventure [review]

    March 14, 2026

    “The Bride” An Overly Ambitious Creature Feature Reimagining [review]

    March 10, 2026
    Check Out Our Latest
      • Product Reviews
      • Reviews
      • SDCC 2021
      • SDCC 2022
    Related Posts

    None found

    NERDBOT
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    Nerdbot is owned and operated by Nerds! If you have an idea for a story or a cool project send us a holler on Editors@Nerdbot.com

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.