Close Menu
NERDBOT
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    Subscribe
    NERDBOT
    • News
      • Reviews
    • Movies & TV
    • Comics
    • Gaming
    • Collectibles
    • Science & Tech
    • Culture
    • Nerd Voices
    • About Us
      • Join the Team at Nerdbot
    NERDBOT
    Home»Nerd Voices»NV Tech»How This AEO Consultant Generated 101 Conversions from AI for a Fintech Platform in 60 Days
    How This AEO Consultant Generated 101 Conversions from AI for a Fintech Platform in 60 Days
    Freepik.com
    NV Tech

    How This AEO Consultant Generated 101 Conversions from AI for a Fintech Platform in 60 Days

    Abdullah JamilBy Abdullah JamilMarch 10, 20268 Mins Read
    Share
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Reddit WhatsApp Email

    Most fintech companies Austin Heaton talks to are still treating AI search like a future problem. They are watching their Google traffic hold steady, running paid campaigns that work well enough, and telling themselves they will figure out ChatGPT and Perplexity later.

    That window is closing faster than most people realize.

    In 60 days working with Lumanu, a B2B influencer payments platform, Austin Heaton generated 656 clicks and 101 conversions directly from AI search engines, primarily ChatGPT and Google Gemini, with zero paid ad spend behind it. This article breaks down exactly how he did it and why the same approach works for fintech companies operating in 2026.

    Key Takeaways

    • AI search now drives measurable, attributable conversions for B2B fintech companies, not just impressions.
    • Optimizing for AI citation requires different content architecture than traditional Google SEO.
    • The highest-leverage move is identifying the exact conversational queries AI models use to recommend products in your category, then owning those queries with structured, authoritative content.

    Why AI Search Is a Fintech-Specific Opportunity Right Now

    Fintech buyers research differently than consumers. A CFO evaluating payroll software or a creator economy startup sourcing a payments API is not typing three-word Google queries. They are asking AI assistants full questions: “What is the best way to pay international contractors without currency fees?” or “Which B2B payment platforms support creator payouts at scale?”

    When a user asks ChatGPT or Perplexity a question like that, the model does not show ten blue links. It synthesizes an answer and cites two or three sources it considers authoritative. If your company is not being cited, a competitor is.

    “According to BrightEdge research, AI-powered search interfaces now influence over 60% of B2B purchase research journeys, yet fewer than 12% of companies have an active strategy to appear in AI-generated answers.” – Austin Heaton, AEO Consultant

    Lumanu was already a strong brand with solid domain authority in the mid-50s. But their content was not structured for AI citation. It was structured for traditional keyword ranking, which is a different problem requiring a different solution.

    The Full-Stack AEO Process Austin Heaton Used

    Step 1: LLM Readiness Audit

    Before touching a single piece of content, Austin Heaton ran a dual audit covering both traditional SEO signals and LLM-specific readiness factors. This included:

    • Reviewing their existing llms.txt configuration and structured data markup
    • Mapping which queries in their category AI models were already answering, and how
    • Identifying which competitors were being cited and why
    • Auditing Core Web Vitals, internal linking architecture, and schema completeness

    The audit revealed that Lumanu had minimal schema coverage on their core product pages and no content directly targeting the conversational query patterns AI models use when recommending payment solutions. They also lacked third-party citations that AI models could reference as corroborating sources.

    The technical fixes were implemented quickly by their team, including advanced schema markup on service and comparison pages, improved Core Web Vitals scores, and a restructured internal linking network that better communicated topical authority to AI crawlers.

    Step 2: Generative Query Mapping

    This is the step most consultants skip entirely, and it is the most important one.

    Traditional keyword research identifies what people type into Google. Generative query mapping identifies what people ask AI assistants, which are longer, more conversational, and often more purchase-intent than traditional queries.

    Using a combination of query simulation and competitive citation analysis, Austin Heaton identified over 1,000 conversational AI queries most likely to produce referrals to Lumanu. These were not generic terms like “influencer payments software.” They were specific questions such as:

    • “Best way to pay creators internationally without taking a fee percentage”
    • “How do brands pay creators at scale without going through each creator manually”
    • “B2B platform that handles payments and compliance for influencer programs”

    AI models return product recommendations for these queries rather than answering them directly. That distinction is critical. A question like “what is influencer marketing” gets answered inline. A question like “what platform should I use to manage creator payments” triggers a citation.

    “The most valuable real estate in AI search is not a top-ten ranking. It is being the company an AI model recommends when a buyer asks which product to use.” – Austin Heaton

    Step 3: Bottom-Funnel-First Content Production

    With the query map in hand, Austin Heaton produced content following a strict hierarchy: solution pages and comparison content first, case studies second, and supporting blog content last. This is the opposite of how most companies approach content marketing.

    Top-of-funnel educational content rarely generates AI citations in a commercial context. When a user asks an AI assistant a question about a product category, the model cites pages that demonstrate clear product relevance, competitive differentiation, and third-party validation. Educational blog posts rarely qualify.

    Each piece of content Austin Heaton produced for Lumanu was structured specifically for LLM extraction. This means:

    • Clear H2 and H3 hierarchy that AI models can parse and attribute
    • Bold statistics and quantified outcomes after every two to three paragraphs
    • Direct Q&A sections that match the exact phrasing of conversational AI queries
    • Expert attribution with named quotes, since AI models prefer citing human experts over anonymous brand content

    Step 4: Authority Building Through DA40+ Backlinks

    AI citation authority is not purely a content problem. It is also a reputation problem.

    LLMs in 2026 weight source credibility heavily when deciding which pages to cite. Domain authority, third-party mentions, and the quality of sites linking to you all influence whether an AI model treats your content as citable or not.

    Lumanu already had domain authority in the mid-50s, which was solid. But to push into consistent AI citation, Austin Heaton secured multiple backlinks from fintech-adjacent publishers with domain authorities between 40 and 80. These were not generic directory links. They were contextual placements in editorial content directly relevant to the B2B payments and creator economy space.

    This pushed their effective domain authority above 60 and created the third-party citation trail that AI models use to cross-reference credibility.

    The Results After 60 Days

    AI Search Performance

    ChatGPT referral clicks: 566 (+134.85% from baseline)

    Google Gemini referral clicks: 46 (+155.56% from baseline)

    Total AI-sourced clicks: 656

    Total conversions from AI search: 101 (99 from ChatGPT, with Gemini showing the highest engagement rate per click)

    The conversion rate from Gemini traffic was notably higher than ChatGPT, which aligns with what Austin Heaton has seen across other fintech clients. Gemini users tend to be deeper into the consideration stage when they click through, making them higher-quality leads even at lower volume.

    Google Search Performance

    Total organic clicks: 28,820 (+17.36%)

    Total impressions: 1.06 million (+22.55%)

    The Google results were a direct byproduct of the same work done for AI optimization. Structured content, technical improvements, and authoritative backlinks improve rankings across both channels simultaneously. This is why full-stack AEO produces compounding returns rather than channel-siloed gains.

    Why This Works for Fintech Specifically

    Fintech buyers are early adopters of AI research tools. The average fintech decision-maker is using ChatGPT or Perplexity to shortlist vendors before they ever visit a company website directly. This creates both an urgency and an opportunity.

    The urgency: if you are not optimized for AI citation, you are invisible to a growing segment of your best buyers.

    The opportunity: most fintech companies have not yet built a coherent AEO strategy. The category is not saturated. A focused 60-day engagement can establish category authority in AI search before competitors close the gap.

    “In fintech, AI search citation is a first-mover advantage. The companies that establish authority now will be the default recommendations AI models return for years.” – Austin Heaton, AEO Consultant

    What Most SEO Consultants Get Wrong About AEO

    The most common mistake Austin Heaton sees is treating Answer Engine Optimization as a content format problem rather than an authority architecture problem. Companies produce FAQ sections and Q&A content, see no improvement in AI citations, and conclude that AEO does not work.

    The format matters, but it is secondary to authority signals. An AI model will not cite a well-structured page from a low-authority domain over a mediocre page from a high-authority one. You need both: the right content architecture and the domain reputation to back it up.

    The second most common mistake is optimizing for informational queries rather than commercial ones. AI models handle informational queries directly. They generate citations for commercial and transactional queries where the user needs a product recommendation. That is the traffic worth optimizing for.

    How to Start

    If you are a fintech company looking to replicate these results, the starting point is a dual-channel audit: one that evaluates your current standing in both traditional Google search and AI citation contexts simultaneously.

    The audit will surface your LLM readiness gaps, identify which queries your competitors are being cited for, and map out the content and authority investments needed to enter the citation mix. From there, the content and link building work follows a predictable playbook.

    The full engagement Austin Heaton ran for Lumanu, including the audit, content production, backlink acquisition, and optimization, was completed within 60 days. The 656 AI clicks and 101 conversions were measured within that same window.

    Austin Heaton is a B2B SEO and Answer Engine Optimization consultant with over 12 years of experience, specializing in AI search visibility for fintech, SaaS, and crypto companies. He works with clients at austinheaton.com.

    Do You Want to Know More?

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Email
    Previous ArticleBest AI SEO Optimisation Services for Web3 Startups in 2026
    Next Article How Austin Heaton Builds Brand Authority in AI Search Engines
    Abdullah Jamil
    • Website
    • Facebook
    • Instagram

    My name is Abdullah Jamil. For the past 4 years, I Have been delivering expert Off-Page SEO services, specializing in high Authority backlinks and guest posting. As a Top Rated Freelancer on Upwork, I Have proudly helped 100+ businesses achieve top rankings on Google first page, driving real growth and online visibility for my clients. I focus on building long-term SEO strategies that deliver proven results, not just promises. Contact: nerdbotpublisher@gmail.com

    Related Posts

    Banana Gun: The Crypto Trading Platform That Lets You Copy Any Profitable Wallet Across Five Blockchains

    Banana Gun: The Crypto Trading Platform That Lets You Copy Any Profitable Wallet Across Five Blockchains

    March 30, 2026
    Reimagine Your Kitchen with AI-Generated Designs That Match Your Style

    Reimagine Your Kitchen with AI-Generated Designs That Match Your Style

    March 30, 2026
    What Goes Into SaaS Video Production And Why It's Different From Regular Video

    What Goes Into SaaS Video Production And Why It’s Different From Regular Video

    March 30, 2026
    Most studios searching for a match-3 level design company are looking for five different things. Some need levels built from scratch, others require a live game rebalanced before churn compounds, and some demand a content pipeline that won't fall behind. These are different problems, and they map to multiple types of companies. The mistake most studios make is treating "match-3 level design" as a single service category and evaluating every company against the same criteria. A specialist who excels at diagnosing retention problems in live games is the wrong hire for a studio that needs 300 levels built in 2 months. A full-cycle agency that builds from concept to launch isn't the right call for a publisher who already has engineering and art in place and just needs the level design layer covered. This guide maps 7 companies for match-3 level design services to the specific problem each one is built to solve. Find your problem first. The right company follows from there. What Match-3 Level Design Services Cover The term "level design" gets used loosely in this market, and this causes bad hires. A studio that excels at building levels from scratch operates dissimilarly from one that diagnoses why a live game's difficulty curve is losing players (even if both describe their service the same way on a website). Match-3 level design breaks into four distinct services, each requiring different expertise, different tooling, and a different type of partner. Level production — designing and building playable levels configured to a game's mechanics, obstacle set, and difficulty targets. This is what most studios mean when they say they need a level design partner, and it's the service with the widest range of quality in the market. Difficulty balancing and rebalancing — using win rates, attempt counts, and churn data to calibrate difficulty across hundreds of levels. Plus, this includes adjusting live content when the data shows a problem. Studios that only do level production typically don't offer this. Studios that do it well treat it as a standalone service. Live-ops level design covers the ongoing content pipeline a live match-3 game requires after launch (seasonal events, new level batches, limited-time challenges) sustained at volume and consistent in quality. This is a throughput and process problem as much as a design problem. Full-cycle development bundles level design inside a complete production engagement: mechanics, art, engineering, monetization, QA, and launch. Level design is one function among many. Depth varies by studio. Knowing which service you need before you evaluate a single company cuts the list in half and prevents the most common mistake in this market: hiring a full-cycle agency to solve a level design problem, or hiring a specialist to build a product from scratch. The List of Companies for Match-3 Level Design Services The companies below were selected based on verified credentials, named shipped titles where available, and the specific service each one is built to deliver. They are ranked by how well their capabilities match the service types outlined above. A specialist who does one thing exceptionally well sits above a generalist who does many things adequately. SolarSpark | Pure-play match-3 level design specialist SolarSpark is a remote-first studio built exclusively around casual puzzle game production. With 7+ years in the genre and 2,000+ levels shipped across live titles including Monopoly Match, Matchland, and KitchenMasters, it is the only company on this list that does nothing but match-3 level design. Level design services: Level production, difficulty curve planning, fail-rate balancing, obstacle and booster logic design, live-ops pipeline, competitor benchmarking, product audit and retention diagnostic. Verdict: The strongest pure specialist on this list. When level design is the specific constraint, SolarSpark is the right choice. What they do well: Every level is built around difficulty curves, fail/win balance, obstacle sequencing, and booster logic, measured against targets before delivery. Competitor benchmarking is available as a standalone service, mapping your game's difficulty curve and monetization structure against current top performers with specific, actionable output. Where they fit: Studios with a live or in-development game that need a dedicated level design pipeline, a retention diagnostic, or a one-off audit before soft launch. Honest caveat: SolarSpark does not handle art, engineering, or full-cycle development. Logic Simplified | Unity-first development with analytics and monetization built in Logic Simplified specializes in Unity-powered casual and puzzle games, with match-3 explicitly in their service portfolio. Operating for over a decade with clients across multiple countries, the studio positions itself around data-informed development: analytics, A/B testing, and monetization are integrated into the production process. Level design services: Level production, difficulty progression design, obstacle and blocker placement, booster and power-up integration, A/B tested level balancing, customer journey mapping applied to level flow. Verdict: A credible full-cycle option for studios that want analytics and monetization treated as design inputs from day one, not as post-launch additions. What they do well: Logic Simplified builds analytics and player behavior tracking into the design process. Their Unity expertise is deep, and their stated MVP timeline of approximately three months is competitive at their price point. India-based rates make full-cycle development accessible without requiring a Western agency budget. Where they fit: Studios building a first match-3 title that needs the full production chain handled by a single vendor, with analytics built in from the start. Honest caveat: No publicly named match-3 titles with verifiable App Store links appear in their portfolio. Ask for specific live game references and retention data during the first conversation before committing. Cubix | US-based full-cycle match-3 development with fixed-cost engagement Cubix is a California-based game development company with a dedicated match-3 service line covering level design, tile behavior, booster systems, obstacles, UI/UX, and full production on Unity and Unreal Engine. 30+ in-house animators can cover the full scope of puzzle game production. Level design services: Level production, combo and difficulty balancing, blocker and locked tile placement, move-limit challenge design, booster and power-up integration, scoring system design. Verdict: A viable full-cycle option for studios that need a Western-based partner with transparent fixed-cost pricing and documented match-3 capability. What they do well: Cubix covers the full production chain in one engagement, with strong visual production backed by an in-house animation team. Their fixed-cost model is a practical differentiator for studios that have been burned by scope creep on previous outsourcing contracts. Staff augmentation is also available for studios that need talent to plug into an existing pipeline. Where they fit: Studios that want a US-based full-cycle partner with predictable budgets, cross-platform delivery across iOS, Android, browsers, and PC, and a single vendor to own the concept through launch. Honest caveat: Named shipped match-3 titles are not prominently listed in their public portfolio. This is a verification gap worth closing during vetting, not a disqualifier on its own. Galaxy4Games | Data-driven match-3 development with published retention case studies Galaxy4Games is a game development studio with 15+ years of operating history, building mobile and cross-platform games across casual, RPG, and arcade genres. Match-3 is a named service line. What distinguishes them from most studios on this list is a level of public transparency about retention data. Their case studies document real D1 and D7 numbers from shipped titles. Level design services: Level production, difficulty curve development, booster and obstacle design, progression system design, LiveOps level content, A/B testing integration, analytics-based balancing. Verdict: The most transparent full-cycle option in terms of real retention data. For studios that want to see numbers before they hire, Galaxy4Games offers evidence most studios keep private. What they do well: Their Puzzle Fight case study documents D1 retention growing to 30% through iteration. Their modular system reduces development time and costs through reusable components, and their LiveOps infrastructure covers analytics, event management, and content updates as a planned post-launch function. Where they fit: Studios that need a data-informed full-cycle match-3 partner and want to evaluate a studio's methodology through published results. Honest caveat: Galaxy4Games covers a broad genre range (casual, RPG, arcade, educational, and Web3), which means match-3 is one of several service lines rather than a primary focus. Zatun | Award-winning level design and production studio with 18 years of operating history Zatun is an indie game studio and work-for-hire partner operating since 2007, with game level design listed as a dedicated named service alongside full-cycle development, art production, and co-development. With 250+ game titles and 300+ clients across AAA studios and indie teams, this agency has one of the longest track records. Level design services: Level production, difficulty progression design, level pacing and goal mapping, game design documentation, Unity level design, Unreal level design, level concept art. Verdict: A reliable, experienced production partner with a long track record and genuine level design depth. What they do well: Zatun's level design service covers difficulty progression, pacing maps, goal documentation, and execution in Unity and Unreal. Their 18 years of operation across 250+ titles gives them a reference library of what works across genres. Their work-for-hire model means they can step in at specific production stages without requiring ownership of the full project. Where they fit: Studios that need a specific level design or art production function covered without a full project handoff. This can be useful for teams mid-production that need additional capacity on a defined scope. Honest caveat: No publicly named match-3 titles appear in Zatun's portfolio, their verified work spans AAA and strategy genres; match-3 specific experience should be confirmed directly before engaging. Gamecrio | Full-cycle mobile match-3 development with AI-driven difficulty adaptation Gamecrio is a mobile game development studio with offices in India and the UK, covering match-3 development as an explicit service line alongside VR, arcade, casino, and web-based game development. Their stated differentiator within match-3 is AI-driven difficulty adaptation. Thus, levels adjust based on player skill. Level design services: Level production, AI-driven difficulty adaptation, booster and power-up design, progression system design, obstacle balancing, social and competitive feature integration, monetization-integrated level design. Verdict: An accessible full-cycle option with a technically interesting differentiator in AI-driven balancing. What they do well: Gamecrio builds monetization architecture into the level design process: IAP placement, rewarded ad integration, battle passes, and subscription models are considered alongside difficulty curves and obstacle sequencing. The AI-driven difficulty adaptation is a genuine technical capability that more established studios in this market have been slower to implement. Where they fit: Early-stage studios that need a full-cycle match-3 build with monetization designed in from the first level. Honest caveat: No publicly named shipped match-3 titles are listed on their site — request live App Store links and verifiable retention data before committing to any engagement. Juego Studios | Full-cycle and co-development partner with puzzle genre credentials and flexible engagement entry points Founded in 2013, Juego Studios is a global full-cycle game development and co-development partner with offices in India, USA, UK, and KSA. With 250+ delivered projects and clients including Disney, Sony, and Tencent, the studio covers game development, game art, and LiveOps across genres. Battle Gems is their verifiable genre credential. Level design services: Level production, difficulty balancing, progression system design, booster and mechanic integration, LiveOps level content, milestone-based level delivery, co-development level design support. Verdict: A well-resourced, credible full-cycle partner with a flexible engagement model that reduces the risk of committing to the wrong studio. What they do well: Juego's engagement model is flexible: studios can start with a risk-free 2-week test sprint, then scale to 20+ team members across modules without recruitment overhead. Three engagement models (outstaffing, dedicated teams, and managed outsourcing) let publishers choose how much control they retain versus how much they hand off. LiveOps is a named service line covering analytics-driven content updates and retention optimization after launch. Where they fit: Studios that need a full-cycle or co-development partner for a match-3 build and want to test the relationship before committing to full project scope. Honest caveat: Puzzle and match-3 are part of a broad genre portfolio that also spans VR, Web3, and enterprise simulations. How to Use This List The seven companies above cover the full range of what the match-3 level design market offers in 2026. The quality range is real, and the right choice depends on which service type matches the problem you're trying to solve. If your game is live and retention is the problem, you need a specialist who can diagnose and fix a difficulty curve. If you're building from zero and need art, engineering, and level design bundled, a full-cycle partner is the right call and the specialist is the wrong one. The honest caveat pattern across several entries in this list reflects a real market condition: verified, named match-3 credentials are rarer than studios' self-descriptions suggest. The companies that couldn't point to a live title with an App Store link were flagged honestly. Asking for live game references, retention data, and a first conversation before any commitment are things you can do before signing with any studio on this list.

    Best AI Tools for Content Creators in 2026

    March 30, 2026
    Best SEO Tools for Improving Website Performance

    Best SEO Tools for Improving Website Performance

    March 30, 2026

    Top 7 Cloud Computing Courses and Certification Programs for DevOps Roles in 2026

    March 30, 2026
    • Latest
    • News
    • Movies
    • TV
    • Reviews
    Metro Traffic School Reviews 2026: Best for Busy Miami Commuters?

    Metro Traffic School Reviews 2026: Best for Busy Miami Commuters?

    March 30, 2026
    Banana Gun: The Crypto Trading Platform That Lets You Copy Any Profitable Wallet Across Five Blockchains

    Banana Gun: The Crypto Trading Platform That Lets You Copy Any Profitable Wallet Across Five Blockchains

    March 30, 2026
    Reimagine Your Kitchen with AI-Generated Designs That Match Your Style

    Reimagine Your Kitchen with AI-Generated Designs That Match Your Style

    March 30, 2026
    "Life of a Showgirl," 2025

    Taylor Swift Sued Over Trademark For “The Life of a Showgirl”

    March 30, 2026
    "Life of a Showgirl," 2025

    Taylor Swift Sued Over Trademark For “The Life of a Showgirl”

    March 30, 2026

    Mark Wahlberg Launches 4AM Club Challenge YouTube Series

    March 26, 2026
    "The Shrouds," 2024

    “The Shrouds,” SeeMeRot, & The History of Corpse Cameras

    March 25, 2026

    “They Will Kill You” A Violent, Blood-Splattering Good Time [review]

    March 24, 2026
    "Lights Out," 2016

    Connor Osborn McIntyre Attached to Write “Lights Out 2”

    March 30, 2026
    "Happy Death Day 2U," 2019

    Jessica Rothe Says “Happy Death Day 3” is ‘Just a Matter of When’

    March 27, 2026

    Andrew Garfield Watched the ‘Controversial’ “Harry Potter” Movies

    March 27, 2026
    Glen Powell's casting announcement as Fox McCloud in “Super Mario Galaxy Movie”

    “Super Mario Galaxy Movie” Cast Adds Glen Powell as Fox McCloud

    March 27, 2026
    “Malcolm in the Middle: Life’s Still Unfair,” 2026

    “Malcolm in the Middle” Could Get a Full-Fledged Reboot

    March 30, 2026

    Survivor 50 Episode 6 Predictions: Who Will Be Voted Off Next?

    March 27, 2026

    “Star Trek: Starfleet Academy” to End With 2nd Season

    March 23, 2026

    Paapa Essiedu Faces Death Threats Over Snape Casting in HBO’s Harry Potter Series

    March 22, 2026

    “They Will Kill You” A Violent, Blood-Splattering Good Time [review]

    March 24, 2026

    “Project Hail Mary” Familiar But Triumphant Sci-Fi Adventure [review]

    March 14, 2026

    “The Bride” An Overly Ambitious Creature Feature Reimagining [review]

    March 10, 2026

    “Peaky Blinders: The Immortal Man” Solid Send Off For Everyone’s Favorite Gangster [review]

    March 6, 2026
    Check Out Our Latest
      • Product Reviews
      • Reviews
      • SDCC 2021
      • SDCC 2022
    Related Posts

    None found

    NERDBOT
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    Nerdbot is owned and operated by Nerds! If you have an idea for a story or a cool project send us a holler on Editors@Nerdbot.com

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.