Close Menu
NERDBOT
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    Subscribe
    NERDBOT
    • News
      • Reviews
    • Movies & TV
    • Comics
    • Gaming
    • Collectibles
    • Science & Tech
    • Culture
    • Nerd Voices
    • About Us
      • Join the Team at Nerdbot
    NERDBOT
    Home»Movies»“Alien: Romulus” Thrills, Chills, Wild Swings That Whiff [Review]
    Movies

    “Alien: Romulus” Thrills, Chills, Wild Swings That Whiff [Review]

    Derrick MurrayBy Derrick MurrayAugust 16, 20248 Mins Read
    Share
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Reddit WhatsApp Email

    For almost 45 years, the “Alien” franchise has consistently provided opportunities for new auteur filmmakers to take their crack at a new iteration. Like many of these IPs that far outlast their humble beginnings, they are populated by extremes; the highest of highs and the lowest of lows that all vary wildly depending on which aspects of the lore or style you enjoy the most. Its longevity is in the malleable DNA of its purist form, allowing each new (or old for that matter) voice to constantly innovate and expand however they see fit. Sometimes it works to perfection like “Aliens,” other times it crashes and burns horribly like “Prometheus.” One could make the argument that these two films should be swapped in terms of how I’ve just labeled them, and that only serves as a testament to just how varied the series has been.

    “Alien: Romulus” is a little bit of everything for everyone, attempting to blend the minimalist, retro aesthetic of “Alien” and “Aliens” with the philosophical examinations of existence of “Prometheus” and “Alien: Covenant,” all while attempting to reimagine the bold ambitions – and ultimately misfires – of “Alien 3” and “Alien Resurrection.” Fede Álvarez (“Evil Dead,” “Don’t Breath“) works overtime to incorporate as much as he possibly can from nearly every iteration that came before it, and for most of the film, succeeds. Álvarez manages to tell a familiar story with a new voice, all while paying homage to the things that laid the groundwork for his vision. “Alien: Romulus” feels fresh even if it doesn’t necessarily bring anything new to the table, and works best when it is creating a hybrid of nostalgia and dread like the first two entires. Where it loses its way is when it forcibly commits the follies of pointless exposition that tie it to “Prometheus,” a move that feels less like Álvarez’ voice and more like Ridley Scott serving as an executive producer and demanding his precious mess of a movie get needlessly included.

    Chronologically, “Alien: Romulus” takes place between “Alien” and “Aliens,” and the stellar late 70s production design paired with its callback shoot em up action set pieces make it feel right at home between these two films. You don’t actually need to watch any of the previous films to understand “Romulus,” but that’s only when it is at its best. That best – which is the highest of highs – is in the first two acts, which focuses on a group of young rebels stuck on a mining colony in which the company is quite literally working them to death with no escape. The ragtag crew discover a derelict space station floating aimlessly just above their planet, and decide to take their small cruiser to hijack the cryo-chambers to carry them off world to a better place. Of course, any space station owned and operated by Weyland Yutani and the company is bad news, and the group soon discover that they are not alone. Something sinister lurks in the shadows, and what was supposed to be a quick smash and grab becomes a fight for survival. The film stars Cailee Spaeny, David Jonsson, Isabela Merced, Archie Renaux Aileen Yu and and Spike Fern.

    When it is primarily concerned with claustrophobic spaces, shadows moving in the dark, red lighting, piercing sound design and terrifying silence before the impending doom, “Alien: Romulus” rules. Álvarez is a master of dread, leaning heavily on practical sets and effects to maximize the film’s gripping terror. We spend a lot of time meeting the characters who, outside of Spaeny’s Rain and her synthetic brother Andy (Jonsson) are really just stand in archetypes for Xenomorph canon fodder. Who they are doesn’t matter as much as the terrifying situations they find themselves in, and Alvarez fills nearly every frame of “Romulus” with immaculate design. It is a breath of fresh air to see a film that feels like a film, one that doesn’t have that abysmal digital sheen that has permeated every single movie in the last 10 years. for 90 minutes, “Romulus” thrives in its visuals, and while some of its homages are a bit on the nose, it manages to use them as an advantage to ratchet up the tension with each new horrifying scenario the characters find themselves in.

    "Alien: Romulus," 2024
    “Alien: Romulus,” 2024 (20th Century Studios)

    Spaeny is having a hell of a run right now, and while she is meant to be the Ripley stand in for “Romulus” she does a good job in making the character her own. The rest of the cast are indistinguishable, existing solely to perish in brutal and bloody ways at the hands of face huggers and xenomorphs. That is, except for Jonsson, who runs circles around everyone in every single moment. I adored him in “Rye Lane,” and “Romulus” is the kind of star making performance that, were it in a genre that actually gets recognition for performances, would launch him into the stratosphere. He is asked to do far more than anyone else in “Romulus,” and ends up being the crux of the film and strangely the only one with any real character. Spaeny is good, but Jonsson is great, and “Romulus” simply doesn’t work without his excellence.

    “Alien: Romulus” is 119 minutes, and I have only complimented 90 minutes of that runtime, which leaves the last 20-25 minutes to discuss. I won’t spoil exactly where things go off the rails, but there is a pivotal moment that is so distinct you can’t miss it. The turn is drastic and frankly stupid, particularly for a film that has spent a large part borrowing many of the best parts of its predecessors. “Romulus” veers off in a completely different direction than what we are led to believe, and instead of finishing strong, borrows from some of the worst ideas from some of the worst entries. I don’t know if Álvarez was feeling himself a bit too much and wanted to take on all challenges, but his reimagined conclusions didn’t work before and it is hubris to think that they would work here. They don’t, and “Romulus” goes off the rails big time, swinging wildly and hitting nothing but air. It misses so hard that it forces a retrospection of some things that weren’t working in the first 90 minutes but you could excuse because everything else around it was so engaging and entertaining.

    All of the callbacks and silly “Prometheus” mumbo jumbo (if you can’t tell, I hate this movie) that were easily dismissed previously come back to taint the highs once “Romulus” reaches its end and reveals itself to be more of a greatest hits album than an inventive, refreshing thriller. Highest of highs and lowest of lows collide like spaceships against an asteroid, and because its the last note you’re left on, it leaves a very bad taste in your mouth. I wish so much that this wasn’t the case, because there is so much to like in “Alien: Romulus.” When it’s working, it rips with white knuckle tension and pushes you to the edge of your seat. It is bloody, gory, exciting, and anchored by an incredible performance from Jonsson. It knows that the best trick is keeping the alien out of sight until absolutely necessary. It knows that what we can’t see is far more terrifying than what we can shine a light on. “Romulus” knows that the best way to bring something to life is to make it for real, and the practicality of almost everything is a vast improvement over some of the poorly rendered, earlier CGI attempts.

    But the unraveling in its final moments are just too big to ignore, and knocks “Alien: Romulus” down quite a few pegs from the greatness it could achieve. It is still better than most, one of the better entries we’ve gotten in recent years. It’s a film that needs to be saved from itself, a folly of ambition, attachment, and reimagining of the wrong things despite being surrounded by so many right ones. “Romulus” thrills and chills, but whiffs when it swings big and smashes some of its better momentum in the process. Álvarez has the juice, and I hope whatever comes next after “Alien: Romulus” abandons some of the worst tendencies – namely any connective tissue to “Prometheus” and whatever the hell that ending was – and settles into the basics of the franchise that he demonstrates he can do very, very, well.

    More David Jonsson in movies, please.

    Rating: 3.5 out of 5 Stars

    “Alien: Romulus” is now playing in theaters. You can watch the trailer below.

    Do You Want to Know More?

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Email
    Previous ArticleIs Jasper a Protection Stone?
    Next Article Demi Moore Becomes Margaret Qualley in “The Substance” Trailer
    Derrick Murray
    • Website
    • Facebook
    • X (Twitter)
    • Instagram

    Derrick Murray is a Los Angeles based stand up comedian, writer, and co-host for The Jack of All Nerds Show.

    Related Posts

    Tubi Indie Spotlight: “Blood and Breakfast” by Mark Byrne

    August 1, 2026
    "Spider-Man: Brand New Day," 2026

    “Spider-Man: Brand New Day” A More Mature, Emotional Spidey Adventure [Review]

    July 31, 2026

    Madeline Brewer, Emory Cohen, Nicholas Alexander Chavez Cast in “Possession” Reboot

    July 30, 2026

    Charles Parnell, Marta Kessler, Caleb Dolden Join Cast of “The Conjuring: First Communion”

    July 30, 2026

    Mike Flanagan Will Write & Produce The Henry Cavill-led “Warhammer 40k”

    July 30, 2026

    Jacob Tremblay to Play Ted Kaczynski in Netflix’s “Unabomber” Film

    July 29, 2026
    • Latest
    • News
    • Movies
    • TV
    • Reviews
    AI Prompt Generator: Why Effective Prompts Are Shaping the Future of Artificial Intelligence

    AI Prompt Generator: Why Effective Prompts Are Shaping the Future of Artificial Intelligence

    August 1, 2026
    Why the MaxFoot MF-33 Electric Tricycle Frame Deserves More Attention

    Why the MaxFoot MF-33 Electric Tricycle Frame Deserves More Attention

    August 1, 2026
    Buying a family cargo bike is different from buying a recreational e-bike. A front-load cargo trike may be expected to transport children, groceries, school bags, pets, and other heavy items several times a day. Motor reserve, battery capacity, braking hardware, passenger protection, and overall value therefore matter more than brand recognition alone. The Bunch Original 4+ and Addmotor E-325 are both front-loading electric cargo trikes with two wheels at the front and one at the rear. Both keep children or cargo visible while riding, and both use hydraulic disc brakes, torque-sensing pedal assistance, seven-speed Shimano drivetrains, and a 20 mph top speed. Their priorities, however, are noticeably different. Bunch offers more passenger seats and a polished premium ownership experience. Addmotor offers stronger performance, a larger battery, longer range, wider tires, and a substantially lower price. For many households, the E-325 therefore looks less like the budget alternative and more like the practical one. Bunch Original 4+ vs. Addmotor E-325 Specifications Category Addmotor E-325 Bunch Original 4+ Motor 750W rear hub, 1,400W peak 500W DAPU geared hub Maximum Torque 90Nm 45Nm Battery 48V 20Ah Samsung, 960Wh 48V 12.8Ah LG, 614Wh Claimed Range 60+ miles in PAS 1 20–30 miles Top Speed 20 mph 20 mph Total Payload 550 lbs 600 lbs Front Box Capacity 250 lbs 400 lbs Passenger Seats Two cushioned seats Four belted seats Tires 20 × 2.4 front / 24 × 3.0 rear 20 × 2.15 front / 24 × 2.0 rear Bike Weight Approximately 198 lbs 168 lbs Listed Price $3,699 $6,499 The current manufacturer listings confirm the major differences in battery size, motor output, seating capacity, range, payload, and price. How Many Passenger Seats Do You Really Need? The clearest advantage of the Bunch Original 4+ is its four-seat passenger box. It includes front and rear benches with four three-point seat belts, while its cargo area is rated for up to 400 pounds. Families that regularly transport three or four children may find this layout difficult to replace. The E-325 has two cushioned passenger seats and two seat belts. Its front box is rated for 250 pounds, while its overall payload limit is 550 pounds. That is below the Bunch bike’s 600-pound total rating, but it remains substantial for ordinary family use. The practical question is not which trike has the highest theoretical capacity. It is how many seats will actually be used every week. A family with one or two children gains little from paying for four positions. The E-325’s 36-inch-long, 25-inch-wide, and 23-inch-high box still provides generous room for children, pets, shopping bags, and daily supplies. Bunch is the logical choice when four seats are essential. For households carrying one child, two children, or a mixture of passengers and cargo, the E-325 offers the more balanced layout. More Motor Reserve for Real Loads Cargo trikes become demanding when starting from a stop, climbing a hill, or moving through an intersection with a loaded box. A motor that feels adequate during an empty test ride can feel far weaker after passengers and groceries are added. The Bunch Original 4+ uses a 500W motor producing 45Nm of torque. The Addmotor E-325 uses a 750W rear-mounted motor rated for up to 1,400W peak output and 90Nm of torque. That gives the Addmotor twice the stated torque. Because both trikes are limited to 20 mph, the stronger E-325 motor is not mainly about chasing speed. Its real benefit is additional reserve at lower speeds. More torque can make loaded starts feel less strained, reduce rider effort on inclines, and help maintain momentum in stop-and-go traffic. This matters in hilly neighborhoods and suburban areas where destinations are farther apart. A family cargo trike is already a heavy machine before anyone climbs aboard. Choosing the stronger drive system leaves more room for passengers and cargo without making the trike feel immediately overwhelmed. A Larger Battery Makes Daily Use Easier The Bunch Original 4+ has a 614Wh battery and a published range of 20 to 30 miles depending on terrain and load. The E-325 uses a 960Wh Samsung battery and is rated for more than 60 miles under PAS 1 conditions. Real-world range will vary with passenger weight, hills, weather, throttle use, speed, tire pressure, and assist level. Even so, battery capacity is objective: the E-325 stores approximately 56 percent more energy. That extra capacity matters even when the rider never attempts a 60-mile journey. It may allow several school runs and errands between charges while providing more breathing room when plans change. A parent can add a grocery stop or park visit without immediately worrying about returning home with a nearly empty battery. The Bunch range may be sufficient for short neighborhood routines. The Addmotor battery is better suited to riders who want their cargo trike to replace more car trips and who do not want charging to become a daily obligation. Wider Tires for Imperfect Neighborhood Roads The E-325 uses 20 × 2.4-inch front tires and a 24 × 3.0-inch rear tire. The Bunch Original 4+ uses 20 × 2.15-inch front tires and a 24 × 2.0-inch rear tire. Wider tires can add cushioning and create a larger contact area on imperfect pavement. They will not turn the E-325 into an off-road vehicle, but they can make cracks, patched asphalt, driveway transitions, and rough neighborhood streets feel less harsh. The wider rear tire also suits the stronger rear-mounted motor and the weight carried through the back of the trike. Both models use hydraulic disc brakes and include parking brakes. Addmotor specifies 180mm brake rotors on all three wheels. The E-325 also combines a mid-axis torque sensor with seven pedal-assist levels, allowing the motor response to feel more natural and controllable while carrying passengers. These are not glamorous features, but they affect nearly every journey. Parents need predictable braking when approaching intersections, while a parking brake helps prevent a loaded trike from rolling as children enter or leave the cargo box. The Price Difference Is Difficult to Ignore The Bunch Original 4+ is currently listed at $6,499, while the Addmotor E-325 is listed at $3,699. That creates a price difference of $2,800. Bunch partly justifies its premium with four-passenger seating, full UL 2271 and UL 2849 compliance, fully assembled delivery, and a strong family-cargo service model. Buyers who specifically need those benefits may accept the higher price. However, the E-325 does not exchange its lower price for entry-level hardware. It offers the stronger motor, twice the stated torque, a 960Wh Samsung battery, torque-sensing assistance, three-wheel hydraulic brakes, wider tires, a reinforced composite cargo box, and a two-year warranty. For a family that only needs two passenger seats, the Bunch premium becomes difficult to defend. The $2,800 difference could cover helmets, high-quality locks, weather equipment, maintenance, insurance, and accessories while still leaving money unspent. A premium cargo bike should provide benefits that match the buyer’s actual routine. Paying more for unused passenger seats does not improve the school run, increase range, or make a hill easier to climb. Which Cargo Trike Is Easier to Live With? The best family vehicle is not necessarily the one with the longest feature list. It is the one that removes the most inconvenience from everyday life. The E-325’s larger battery can reduce charging frequency. Its stronger motor provides greater assistance when the box is loaded. Its wider tires are appropriate for less-than-perfect streets, while its two-seat cargo area covers the needs of many small and medium-sized families. Bunch offers more seats, but Addmotor provides more performance in the areas riders will notice every day. Unless a household routinely transports more than two children, the E-325’s combination of range, power, cargo flexibility, and price is difficult to overlook. Final Verdict The Bunch Original 4+ remains a compelling specialist choice for families that regularly need four belted passenger positions. It also has a higher total payload rating, lower bike weight, and fully assembled delivery. For most other buyers, the Addmotor E-325 is the stronger overall value. It provides more motor power, twice the stated torque, a much larger battery, longer claimed range, wider tires, and a far lower purchase price. Its two-seat front box is sufficient for many families and remains useful for groceries, pets, work supplies, and weekend outings. Bunch wins the seating-capacity contest. Addmotor wins the broader comparison for power, range, flexibility, and cost. Unless four passenger seats are essential, the E-325 is the cargo trike that makes more sense for real family life.

    Bunch Electric Cargo Bike vs. Addmotor E-325: Which One Fits Real Family Life Better?

    August 1, 2026

    How to Get a Driver’s License in Miami Florida

    August 1, 2026
    "Spider-Man: Brand New Day," 2026

    “Spider-Man: Brand New Day” A More Mature, Emotional Spidey Adventure [Review]

    July 31, 2026

    LEGO Introduces SMART Play Gateways & Several New Sets at SDCC 2026

    July 23, 2026

    Jason Alexander Apologizes For ‘Inappropriate’ Underaged Courtney Stodden Sketch

    July 22, 2026

    Mara Wilson Shares Her Thoughts on a Potential “Matilda” Sequel

    July 21, 2026

    Tubi Indie Spotlight: “Blood and Breakfast” by Mark Byrne

    August 1, 2026
    "Spider-Man: Brand New Day," 2026

    “Spider-Man: Brand New Day” A More Mature, Emotional Spidey Adventure [Review]

    July 31, 2026

    Madeline Brewer, Emory Cohen, Nicholas Alexander Chavez Cast in “Possession” Reboot

    July 30, 2026

    Charles Parnell, Marta Kessler, Caleb Dolden Join Cast of “The Conjuring: First Communion”

    July 30, 2026

    “American Idol” Renewed, Showcases Network TV Issues

    July 30, 2026

    Ryan Murphy Says “American Horror Story” Season 13 Brings Together All Previous Seasons

    July 29, 2026

    Mike Flanagan’s “Carrie” Series Gets Release Date, Teaser Trailer

    July 27, 2026

    It’s a Good Time to be a “Stranger Things” Fan With 10th Anniversary Merch

    July 17, 2026
    "Spider-Man: Brand New Day," 2026

    “Spider-Man: Brand New Day” A More Mature, Emotional Spidey Adventure [Review]

    July 31, 2026

    “The Odyssey” A Flawed But Staggering Spectacle of Scale and Scope [review]

    July 17, 2026

    “Gail Daughtry and the Celebrity Sex Pass” Wizard of Oz Meets Screwball Sex Comedy

    July 10, 2026
    Jackass

    “Jackass: Best and Last” A Swan Song for Nut Taps [review]

    June 27, 2026
    Check Out Our Latest
      • Product Reviews
      • Reviews
      • SDCC 2021
      • SDCC 2022
    Related Posts

    None found

    NERDBOT
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    Nerdbot is owned and operated by Nerds! If you have an idea for a story or a cool project send us a holler on Editors@Nerdbot.com.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.