Close Menu
NERDBOT
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    Subscribe
    NERDBOT
    • News
      • Reviews
    • Movies & TV
    • Comics
    • Gaming
    • Collectibles
    • Science & Tech
    • Culture
    • Nerd Voices
    • About Us
      • Join the Team at Nerdbot
    NERDBOT
    Home»Movies»“The Fantastic Four: First Steps” Fleeting Family Drama, Same Old MCU [Review]
    "Fantastic Four: First Steps" Marvel Studios
    Movies

    “The Fantastic Four: First Steps” Fleeting Family Drama, Same Old MCU [Review]

    Derrick MurrayBy Derrick MurrayJuly 26, 202510 Mins Read
    Share
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Reddit WhatsApp Email

    It may be time to stop putting all of our hopes and dreams and savior complex expectations on to every new MCU entry. After nearly 40 films all considered canon and imbued with franchise implications, even the best attempts are going to start delivering diminishing returns. “The Fantastic Four: First Steps” arrives at the heart of the storm of those deliveries, with nearly 5 years of duds and occasional bright spots. It simultaneously ends the lesser received current phase and ushers in a new direction phase for the once dominant studio, and does so with mixed results.

    It is a tale of two films; one that attempts to take its first steps into new directions and one that backtracks into the same old tired Marvel Studios machine.

    “The Fantastic Four: First Steps” Marvel Studios

    It’s a film that – for better or worse – clearly spent too much time on the internet listening to film podcasts and attempts to correct some of the most common criticisms, but also doesn’t trust its audience enough to embrace its risks and settle itself firmly in the new world it creates. Admittedly, it gets more right than it does wrong, and some lessons learned are high points that lull you into a false sense of newness that only flashes itself amid the CGI slop and uninspired climax. It’s a family drama posing as a superhero action film, one that smartly bypasses the origin story and begins in a retro futuristic alternate earth (828 to be exact) but never really explores it extensively. A strange thing to say given that “The Fantastic Four: First Steps” sports some of the best production design the MCU has seen and creates a world that feels wholly lived in and fleshed out. And it does place the family drama front and center, as we spend the most amount of the film’s runtime with our heroes navigating their own dynamics and life changes.

    But those things – which are the easily the most intriguing – feel like they’re on fast forward. Every time the film starts to become interesting by exploring our heroes more thoroughly, it second guesses itself and rushes through to get us to the next big action sequence, ultimately delivering a risk averse entry rather than something truly unique. Matt Shakman (“Wandavision“) clearly understands family and nuanced characterizations, and when his stronger filmmaking sensibilities line up with a great cast, the film displays some of the best storytelling Marvel Studios has to offer.

    But like most post “Endgame” MCU films, the inescapable corporatization cogs wrap their arms around Shakman and keep him largely restrained from really digging into each character. This dichotomy makes the film feel stakeless, with our investment in the characters only effective long enough for the moment in which they are presented and disappear entirely as soon as some time has passed.

    Pedro Pascal “The Fantastic Four: First Steps” Marvel Studios

    Because Shakman’s direction and messy script from Josh Friedman, Eric Pearson, Jeff Kaplan, and Ian Springer (four writers and one of them not being the director is never a good sign and isn’t…dare I say…fantastic) are shackled by its baked in pedestrian storytelling, it never gets a chance to breath and really let its cast settle into their defined roles. We meet our heroes 4 years after they got their powers, with them being both celebrities and world leaders that serve as unchallenged protectors. And before you even ask, yes. “Superman” and “The Fantastic Four: First Steps” do share very similar narrative frameworks. The retro futuristic world with a 60s All American vibe paired with science fiction technology resolves most if not all of this world’s problems, leaving our heroes to deal with something new: a baby on the way.

    Pedro Pascal, Vanessa Kirby “The Fantastic Four: First Steps” Marvel Studios

    Reed Richards (Pedro Pascal) and Sue Storm (Vanessa Kirby) prepare for parenthood while Johnny Storm (Joseph Quinn) and Ben Grimm (Ebon Moss-Bachrach) celebrate being the cool uncles. It’s their biggest problem to solve until Shalla-Bal/Silver Surfer (Julia Garner) arrives as the herald of Galactus, a giant planet eating cosmic being who has marked their world for consumption. After the team attempts to take the fight to him in space, Galactus believes the unborn child possesses unknown cosmic powers and is the answer to his unquenchable hunger and offers the group an opportunity to save their world in exchange for their child. Of course they say no, but now the team must scramble to not only protect their own but somehow save their world from an unkillable, all powerful entity bent on complete destruction as the world that once embraced them begins to turn on them. Again, yes. JUST like “Superman.”

    It also stars Sarah Niles, Mark Gatiss, Ralph Ineson, Paul Walter Hauser, and Natasha Lyonne.

    Ebon Moss-Bachrach “Fantastic Four: First Steps” Marvel Studios

    It’s clear that each character had more to do at one point but every story line was cut down to mini bites to make way for Galactus’ kiaju monster arrival. Mr. Fantastic/Reed Richards real struggle isn’t solving the cosmic problem. It’s him trying to solve for the unknowable of a child, constantly insisting that nothing is going to change but knowing that everything HAS to change. He is saddled with immense guilt that manifests in his pragmatic suggestions of worst case scenarios like giving up the child and is frightened by that darkness in him and the burden of genius. Pascal is at his best when he’s trying to convey this, but “The Fantastic Four: First Steps” is only slightly interested in this part of the character, and glosses over the more layered aspects of that internal and familial turmoil to place him front of a chalk board and have him spout science mumbo jumbo. It’s the wrong performance from an otherwise game performer, and you never really believe that he’s the smartest man in the universe.

    “The Fantastic Four: First Steps” Marvel Studios

    Ben Grimm/The Thing has accepted his rockness but is clearly lonely, having nothing and no one outside of his found family among the team. There’s a subplot involving Rachel (Lyonne) that shows a spark of a relationship but we never see them navigate it. We’re just led to believe it’s something important to him in their first meeting and then deeply meaningful in their second meeting, and those are the only two times we ever see them interact. This is what I mean when I say the movie feels like its playing in fast forward; every single character has some kind of deeper subplot that would make want to spend more time with each of them to flesh them out and invest in them, but the film is only interested in these things on the surface. That face value level then forces our cast to work overtime to convince us that they are in fact a family (they have to tell us over and over again instead of just trusting us to believe it through their interactions and personal struggles) and that they have any chemistry to begin with.

    Joseph Quinn, Pedro Pascal “The Fantastic Four: First Steps” Marvel Studios

    I believe they DO have chemistry, and they’re all trying hard to convey their struggles. But the script and odd pacing reduces them to mere outlines of what should be full pictures. Kirby is probably the MVP despite being reduced to protective mama mode and Quinn – though not as arrogant or self assured as previous iterations – is trying his best to be the funny, more light hearted one even when its forcing everyone else to be on a different wavelength. Ineson’s Galactus might as well be anyone, and Garner’s Silver Surfer is all but forgotten about until the plot deems her necessary again.

    In the moment, “The Fantastic Four: First Steps” feels fantastic, the family dynamics – though working in a hit or miss capacity – feel easy to latch onto and makes you want to root for the team even though you’re told pretty quickly nothing is ever going to happen to anyone here. It’s easy to dismiss those nagging issues because everyone wants – nay, NEEDS – it to be the most fantastic thing the MCU has put out. It MUST shoulder the entirety of the franchise and carry it into the future.

    Julie Garner “The Fantastic Four: First Steps” Marvel Studios

    But it doesn’t and shouldn’t, its best features being the absence of an origin story first act and a completely contained story. There’s no homework required for “The Fantastic Four: First Steps” and if you’ve never seen a Marvel movie before (who are you? do you even exist?) or have seen all of them, the film doesn’t need any of them to be enjoyed. And for all my criticisms, there is a lot to enjoy. In addition to the incredible design, Michael Giacchino’s score is magnificent, soaring and pulsing with choral beauty that constantly breaths life into every moment. There’s so much family here, Dominic Torretto owns it on 4K Blu Ray, and when the cast is given moments to just be together is when the film really shines. And while the film’s story isn’t necessarily new, it still moves with efficiency and intention. It may retread the same “Fantastic Four” stories of the past, but I’d argue it does more of those things better even if it doesn’t do all of them best.

    Vanessa Kirby “The Fantastic Four: First Steps” Marvel Studios

    I left the theater feeling fulfilled, with my initial reaction being highly positive, and a sense of “Marvel is so back, baby!” But as I drove away and spent more and more time away from and reflecting on it, the less effective it felt and the more dulled my positivity became. The review I was going to write immediately after and the review you’re reading now are completely different, and those missteps become more and more glaring the more it bounces around in my brain. “The Fantastic Four: First Steps” IS among the better and probably best MCU entries we had in a very long time, but it’s not without its own share of struggles that seem to overshadow much of its goodwill. Its first steps towards something new ultimately pivot into the same, tired future that continues to feel more and more daunting.

    It is good enough, but not fantastic. It could be, but it is too afraid to get dirty and different and never embraces the better parts of its potential. “The Incredibles” remains the best version of this fantastic family, but i guess coming close to the impossibly high bar isn’t the worst thing we could ask for. That worst belongs to 2015 “Fan4stic,” a film better if we just pretend doesn’t exist.

    Final note: we can stop with the mid credit scenes, now. We don’t need them, they only ever waste our time, and “The Fantastic Four: First Steps” has one of the worst I’ve seen in a while. I won’t spoil it (which I don’t really know if I could) but I’m gonna stand on business and say “Avengers: Doomsday” is going to be awful. I said what I said.

    Rating: 3.5 out of 5 Stars

    “Fantastic Four: First Steps” is now playing in theaters. You can watch the trailer below.

    Do You Want to Know More?

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Email
    Previous Article[SDCC] “TWD: Daryl Dixon” Renewed for Final Season
    Next Article “Spartacus: House of Ashur” Trailer Hits
    Derrick Murray
    • Website
    • Facebook
    • X (Twitter)
    • Instagram

    Derrick Murray is a Los Angeles based stand up comedian, writer, and co-host for The Jack of All Nerds Show.

    Related Posts

    Tubi Indie Spotlight: “Blood and Breakfast” by Mark Byrne

    August 1, 2026
    "Spider-Man: Brand New Day," 2026

    “Spider-Man: Brand New Day” A More Mature, Emotional Spidey Adventure [Review]

    July 31, 2026

    Madeline Brewer, Emory Cohen, Nicholas Alexander Chavez Cast in “Possession” Reboot

    July 30, 2026

    Charles Parnell, Marta Kessler, Caleb Dolden Join Cast of “The Conjuring: First Communion”

    July 30, 2026

    Mike Flanagan Will Write & Produce The Henry Cavill-led “Warhammer 40k”

    July 30, 2026

    Jacob Tremblay to Play Ted Kaczynski in Netflix’s “Unabomber” Film

    July 29, 2026
    • Latest
    • News
    • Movies
    • TV
    • Reviews
    AI Prompt Generator: Why Effective Prompts Are Shaping the Future of Artificial Intelligence

    AI Prompt Generator: Why Effective Prompts Are Shaping the Future of Artificial Intelligence

    August 1, 2026
    Why the MaxFoot MF-33 Electric Tricycle Frame Deserves More Attention

    Why the MaxFoot MF-33 Electric Tricycle Frame Deserves More Attention

    August 1, 2026
    Buying a family cargo bike is different from buying a recreational e-bike. A front-load cargo trike may be expected to transport children, groceries, school bags, pets, and other heavy items several times a day. Motor reserve, battery capacity, braking hardware, passenger protection, and overall value therefore matter more than brand recognition alone. The Bunch Original 4+ and Addmotor E-325 are both front-loading electric cargo trikes with two wheels at the front and one at the rear. Both keep children or cargo visible while riding, and both use hydraulic disc brakes, torque-sensing pedal assistance, seven-speed Shimano drivetrains, and a 20 mph top speed. Their priorities, however, are noticeably different. Bunch offers more passenger seats and a polished premium ownership experience. Addmotor offers stronger performance, a larger battery, longer range, wider tires, and a substantially lower price. For many households, the E-325 therefore looks less like the budget alternative and more like the practical one. Bunch Original 4+ vs. Addmotor E-325 Specifications Category Addmotor E-325 Bunch Original 4+ Motor 750W rear hub, 1,400W peak 500W DAPU geared hub Maximum Torque 90Nm 45Nm Battery 48V 20Ah Samsung, 960Wh 48V 12.8Ah LG, 614Wh Claimed Range 60+ miles in PAS 1 20–30 miles Top Speed 20 mph 20 mph Total Payload 550 lbs 600 lbs Front Box Capacity 250 lbs 400 lbs Passenger Seats Two cushioned seats Four belted seats Tires 20 × 2.4 front / 24 × 3.0 rear 20 × 2.15 front / 24 × 2.0 rear Bike Weight Approximately 198 lbs 168 lbs Listed Price $3,699 $6,499 The current manufacturer listings confirm the major differences in battery size, motor output, seating capacity, range, payload, and price. How Many Passenger Seats Do You Really Need? The clearest advantage of the Bunch Original 4+ is its four-seat passenger box. It includes front and rear benches with four three-point seat belts, while its cargo area is rated for up to 400 pounds. Families that regularly transport three or four children may find this layout difficult to replace. The E-325 has two cushioned passenger seats and two seat belts. Its front box is rated for 250 pounds, while its overall payload limit is 550 pounds. That is below the Bunch bike’s 600-pound total rating, but it remains substantial for ordinary family use. The practical question is not which trike has the highest theoretical capacity. It is how many seats will actually be used every week. A family with one or two children gains little from paying for four positions. The E-325’s 36-inch-long, 25-inch-wide, and 23-inch-high box still provides generous room for children, pets, shopping bags, and daily supplies. Bunch is the logical choice when four seats are essential. For households carrying one child, two children, or a mixture of passengers and cargo, the E-325 offers the more balanced layout. More Motor Reserve for Real Loads Cargo trikes become demanding when starting from a stop, climbing a hill, or moving through an intersection with a loaded box. A motor that feels adequate during an empty test ride can feel far weaker after passengers and groceries are added. The Bunch Original 4+ uses a 500W motor producing 45Nm of torque. The Addmotor E-325 uses a 750W rear-mounted motor rated for up to 1,400W peak output and 90Nm of torque. That gives the Addmotor twice the stated torque. Because both trikes are limited to 20 mph, the stronger E-325 motor is not mainly about chasing speed. Its real benefit is additional reserve at lower speeds. More torque can make loaded starts feel less strained, reduce rider effort on inclines, and help maintain momentum in stop-and-go traffic. This matters in hilly neighborhoods and suburban areas where destinations are farther apart. A family cargo trike is already a heavy machine before anyone climbs aboard. Choosing the stronger drive system leaves more room for passengers and cargo without making the trike feel immediately overwhelmed. A Larger Battery Makes Daily Use Easier The Bunch Original 4+ has a 614Wh battery and a published range of 20 to 30 miles depending on terrain and load. The E-325 uses a 960Wh Samsung battery and is rated for more than 60 miles under PAS 1 conditions. Real-world range will vary with passenger weight, hills, weather, throttle use, speed, tire pressure, and assist level. Even so, battery capacity is objective: the E-325 stores approximately 56 percent more energy. That extra capacity matters even when the rider never attempts a 60-mile journey. It may allow several school runs and errands between charges while providing more breathing room when plans change. A parent can add a grocery stop or park visit without immediately worrying about returning home with a nearly empty battery. The Bunch range may be sufficient for short neighborhood routines. The Addmotor battery is better suited to riders who want their cargo trike to replace more car trips and who do not want charging to become a daily obligation. Wider Tires for Imperfect Neighborhood Roads The E-325 uses 20 × 2.4-inch front tires and a 24 × 3.0-inch rear tire. The Bunch Original 4+ uses 20 × 2.15-inch front tires and a 24 × 2.0-inch rear tire. Wider tires can add cushioning and create a larger contact area on imperfect pavement. They will not turn the E-325 into an off-road vehicle, but they can make cracks, patched asphalt, driveway transitions, and rough neighborhood streets feel less harsh. The wider rear tire also suits the stronger rear-mounted motor and the weight carried through the back of the trike. Both models use hydraulic disc brakes and include parking brakes. Addmotor specifies 180mm brake rotors on all three wheels. The E-325 also combines a mid-axis torque sensor with seven pedal-assist levels, allowing the motor response to feel more natural and controllable while carrying passengers. These are not glamorous features, but they affect nearly every journey. Parents need predictable braking when approaching intersections, while a parking brake helps prevent a loaded trike from rolling as children enter or leave the cargo box. The Price Difference Is Difficult to Ignore The Bunch Original 4+ is currently listed at $6,499, while the Addmotor E-325 is listed at $3,699. That creates a price difference of $2,800. Bunch partly justifies its premium with four-passenger seating, full UL 2271 and UL 2849 compliance, fully assembled delivery, and a strong family-cargo service model. Buyers who specifically need those benefits may accept the higher price. However, the E-325 does not exchange its lower price for entry-level hardware. It offers the stronger motor, twice the stated torque, a 960Wh Samsung battery, torque-sensing assistance, three-wheel hydraulic brakes, wider tires, a reinforced composite cargo box, and a two-year warranty. For a family that only needs two passenger seats, the Bunch premium becomes difficult to defend. The $2,800 difference could cover helmets, high-quality locks, weather equipment, maintenance, insurance, and accessories while still leaving money unspent. A premium cargo bike should provide benefits that match the buyer’s actual routine. Paying more for unused passenger seats does not improve the school run, increase range, or make a hill easier to climb. Which Cargo Trike Is Easier to Live With? The best family vehicle is not necessarily the one with the longest feature list. It is the one that removes the most inconvenience from everyday life. The E-325’s larger battery can reduce charging frequency. Its stronger motor provides greater assistance when the box is loaded. Its wider tires are appropriate for less-than-perfect streets, while its two-seat cargo area covers the needs of many small and medium-sized families. Bunch offers more seats, but Addmotor provides more performance in the areas riders will notice every day. Unless a household routinely transports more than two children, the E-325’s combination of range, power, cargo flexibility, and price is difficult to overlook. Final Verdict The Bunch Original 4+ remains a compelling specialist choice for families that regularly need four belted passenger positions. It also has a higher total payload rating, lower bike weight, and fully assembled delivery. For most other buyers, the Addmotor E-325 is the stronger overall value. It provides more motor power, twice the stated torque, a much larger battery, longer claimed range, wider tires, and a far lower purchase price. Its two-seat front box is sufficient for many families and remains useful for groceries, pets, work supplies, and weekend outings. Bunch wins the seating-capacity contest. Addmotor wins the broader comparison for power, range, flexibility, and cost. Unless four passenger seats are essential, the E-325 is the cargo trike that makes more sense for real family life.

    Bunch Electric Cargo Bike vs. Addmotor E-325: Which One Fits Real Family Life Better?

    August 1, 2026

    How to Get a Driver’s License in Miami Florida

    August 1, 2026
    "Spider-Man: Brand New Day," 2026

    “Spider-Man: Brand New Day” A More Mature, Emotional Spidey Adventure [Review]

    July 31, 2026

    LEGO Introduces SMART Play Gateways & Several New Sets at SDCC 2026

    July 23, 2026

    Jason Alexander Apologizes For ‘Inappropriate’ Underaged Courtney Stodden Sketch

    July 22, 2026

    Mara Wilson Shares Her Thoughts on a Potential “Matilda” Sequel

    July 21, 2026

    Tubi Indie Spotlight: “Blood and Breakfast” by Mark Byrne

    August 1, 2026
    "Spider-Man: Brand New Day," 2026

    “Spider-Man: Brand New Day” A More Mature, Emotional Spidey Adventure [Review]

    July 31, 2026

    Madeline Brewer, Emory Cohen, Nicholas Alexander Chavez Cast in “Possession” Reboot

    July 30, 2026

    Charles Parnell, Marta Kessler, Caleb Dolden Join Cast of “The Conjuring: First Communion”

    July 30, 2026

    “American Idol” Renewed, Showcases Network TV Issues

    July 30, 2026

    Ryan Murphy Says “American Horror Story” Season 13 Brings Together All Previous Seasons

    July 29, 2026

    Mike Flanagan’s “Carrie” Series Gets Release Date, Teaser Trailer

    July 27, 2026

    It’s a Good Time to be a “Stranger Things” Fan With 10th Anniversary Merch

    July 17, 2026
    "Spider-Man: Brand New Day," 2026

    “Spider-Man: Brand New Day” A More Mature, Emotional Spidey Adventure [Review]

    July 31, 2026

    “The Odyssey” A Flawed But Staggering Spectacle of Scale and Scope [review]

    July 17, 2026

    “Gail Daughtry and the Celebrity Sex Pass” Wizard of Oz Meets Screwball Sex Comedy

    July 10, 2026
    Jackass

    “Jackass: Best and Last” A Swan Song for Nut Taps [review]

    June 27, 2026
    Check Out Our Latest
      • Product Reviews
      • Reviews
      • SDCC 2021
      • SDCC 2022
    Related Posts

    None found

    NERDBOT
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    Nerdbot is owned and operated by Nerds! If you have an idea for a story or a cool project send us a holler on Editors@Nerdbot.com.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.