Close Menu
NERDBOT
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    Subscribe
    NERDBOT
    • News
      • Reviews
    • Movies & TV
    • Comics
    • Gaming
    • Collectibles
    • Science & Tech
    • Culture
    • Nerd Voices
    • About Us
      • Join the Team at Nerdbot
    NERDBOT
    Home»Movies & TV»“Moonfall” is Bloated, Ridiculous for all the Wrong Reasons [Review]
    Movies & TV

    “Moonfall” is Bloated, Ridiculous for all the Wrong Reasons [Review]

    Derrick MurrayBy Derrick MurrayFebruary 4, 20227 Mins Read
    Share
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Reddit WhatsApp Email

    When I first saw Roland Emmerich was at it again, ready to hurl the moon at earth, I rolled my eyes hard. Then, after days of Sundance screenings, “Moonfall” became exactly the kind of mindless entertainment I needed to recharge. I legitimately could not wait to sit back, shovel popcorn into my mouth like a gorilla, and let the silliness and explosions waft over me for a bit.

    What actually ends up happening is a collection of Emmerich’s greatest hits clashed together in a convoluted, uninteresting, and rather dull movie going experience. There’s like 8 different movies happening here, and none of them are the movie I paid to see. It’s part family drama, part disaster flick, sci-fi fantasy, conspiracy theory, and a little bit of everything else he’s every done all rolled into one.

    “Moonfall” is one of the most confusing films I’ve seen in a long time, with a third act that is so far out of left field it feels like it was an abandoned treatment for “Independence Day: Resurgence” that got dusted off and slapped on to whatever the fuck this was suppose to be.

    By this point, you should already know what to expect from Roland Emmerich, who writes and directs “Moonfall.” Scientists discover an impending disaster, a genius who’s been ignored for his wild theories ends up being right, our small band of heroes become the world’s only hope while their families get left behind to out run tsunamis and falling buildings all while the military wants to nuke whatever they don’t understand. It is without a doubt a reskin of everything that came before it, and truthfully if that’s all it was I would’ve been completely on board. But Emmerich seems incapable or unwilling to admit that this is what he does best, and he seems defiantly refusing to embrace his own ridiculousness.

    Lionsgate

    There’s an air of smugness that surrounds “Moonfall,” and it seems to think it’s better and more impactful than it actually is. It constantly falls victim to thinking its more important than it is, and desperately wants to be more than the sum of its parts. It’s not, and this then draws attention to all of its narrative flaws instead of embracing them. Emmerich also seems to have never heard of editing or cutting room floors, purposefully choosing to bloat “Moonfall” with so many subplots and useless characters it becomes impossible to enjoy any of them. He seems to think that character development is only found in two places: divorced parents with children and including as many characters as possible. It’s like any idea he’s ever had, whether it’s relevant or not makes it into the final cut, leaving absolutely nothing out and creating a cacophony of confusion and convoluted storytelling.

    This may be too bold and unfair to say, and I may end up taking it back once I finally have some time to unpack whatever “Moonfall” is supposed to be. But Emmerich may just be the American Uwe Bol, making films for tax loopholes and calling in tons of favors from countless famous people. I simply can’t imagine any other circumstance as to how he is able to procure an insane amount of money to make these kinds of films over and over again, and there’s no possible way Donald Sutherland read the script for “Moonfall” and went, “ya, I NEED to be a part of this project.”

    Lionsgate

    The thing is, if “Moonfall” just embraced its absurdity and trimmed the fat, it would be the exact kind of mind numbing disaster flick I craved. At its most basic level, it has all of that potential just waiting to be pushed to the forefront. Instead, we get an overload of narrative filler that forces all of our characters to just meander about from room to room and place to place without any real sense of urgency. Oh, and time and distance don’t matter in “Moonfall.” Two days, a few hours, 3 weeks; it’s all the same here because no one actually moves or acts as if the moon isn’t hurling towards Earth even as they are literally standing in the remnants of that very destruction.

    Look, I’m not one to call out this kind of film for ignoring actual time and space to move the plot along. But “Moonfall” creates a lot of its own mistakes by making it a point to include them and draw attention to them, which in turn makes them stick out like a sore thumb and impossible to ignore. A narrative loophole is to simply ignore it altogether. Things happen how they happen and the only concept of time that we ever need is that it’s running out. But no, “Moonfall” is dead set on constantly providing time stamps for just about everything, with characters going out of their way to reference how many days, hours, weeks etc they have. If THEY have to talk about it, I as a viewer have to address it, and now I have wrestle with accidental time travel to try and make sense of it all.

    Lionsgate

    “Moonfall” would work better if everyone involved just admitted and accepted that they’re making “Moonfall.” They don’t, and I’m convinced that Patrick Wilson, Halle Berry and John Bradley all think they’re in different films despite spending a majority of their screen time together. And don’t even get me started as to why the hell Kelly Yu and Michael Pena are in this thing. You could pretty much cut out every single person sans the big three and the film would carry on exactly the same way. This only adds to the frustration because we spend an inordinate amount of time with characters that simply don’t matter.

    I don’t need “Moonfall” to be better. That’s not what I wanted from it. I need it to be bad for the right reasons and not the wrong ones, and its packed to the brim with all of the wrong things that make it more of confusing slog than a fun, silly b-movie. And don’t even get me started on the third act. It’s usually easy to predict how these things will all play out, and Emerich throws a curve ball so hard and far it makes the moon changing orbit feel normal. Within seconds, we are transported into a completely different movie that nullifies everything that came before it, and only adds to the immense confusion in the worst of ways. My head hurts trying to figure it all out, and it only gets worse the more I try.

    Lionsgate

    I really wanted to like “Moonfall.” I’m not be facetious, either. I genuinely wanted to be swept away by the sheer preposterous premise of the Moon being hurled towards earth because of aliens or whatever. I needed it, and it somehow failed to deliver the most simple of asks from a film like this. There’s a decent movie in here somewhere, but you have to sift through all of the other films within this one to find it. Frankly, it’s not worth the effort.

    I’m not saying we need to stop making disaster movies, I’m just saying we need to stop giving Emmerich money to make them. And no, Mr. Emmerich. Marvel Studios, DC via WB, and Star Wars are not the reason “Moonfall” isn’t going to gross a billion dollars at the box office, Roland. Take responsibility and own your schlock or stop making it and let others make better versions of the same movie you’ve been making for 20+ years.

    This movie isn’t fun. It’s upsetting and confusing and boring, and that actually makes it more upsetting and confusing the longer I dwell on my disappointment.

    Lionsgate

    Oh, and “Moonfall” is brought to you by Lexus. Buy yours and outrun gravity fields today!

    Rating: 1.5 out of 5 Stars

    Do You Want to Know More?

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Email
    Previous ArticleNothing Says I Love You Like LEGO Roses!
    Next Article BAFTA Award Nominations: Snubs, Surprises, and More!
    Derrick Murray
    • Website
    • Facebook
    • X (Twitter)
    • Instagram

    Derrick Murray is a Los Angeles based stand up comedian, writer, and co-host for The Jack of All Nerds Show.

    Related Posts

    "Spider-Man: Brand New Day," 2026

    “Spider-Man: Brand New Day” A More Mature, Emotional Spidey Adventure [Review]

    July 31, 2026

    Tilly Norwood Creator Claims She’s Creating More Jobs

    July 27, 2026

    LEGO Introduces SMART Play Gateways & Several New Sets at SDCC 2026

    July 23, 2026
    "King of The Hill," 2025

    Review – King of the Hill Season 15 – Still the King

    July 23, 2026

    Amazon Finally Greenlights Robocop Series

    July 23, 2026

    Live-Action Disney, Tiana Film in the Works

    July 23, 2026
    • Latest
    • News
    • Movies
    • TV
    • Reviews
    AI Prompt Generator: Why Effective Prompts Are Shaping the Future of Artificial Intelligence

    AI Prompt Generator: Why Effective Prompts Are Shaping the Future of Artificial Intelligence

    August 1, 2026
    Why the MaxFoot MF-33 Electric Tricycle Frame Deserves More Attention

    Why the MaxFoot MF-33 Electric Tricycle Frame Deserves More Attention

    August 1, 2026
    Buying a family cargo bike is different from buying a recreational e-bike. A front-load cargo trike may be expected to transport children, groceries, school bags, pets, and other heavy items several times a day. Motor reserve, battery capacity, braking hardware, passenger protection, and overall value therefore matter more than brand recognition alone. The Bunch Original 4+ and Addmotor E-325 are both front-loading electric cargo trikes with two wheels at the front and one at the rear. Both keep children or cargo visible while riding, and both use hydraulic disc brakes, torque-sensing pedal assistance, seven-speed Shimano drivetrains, and a 20 mph top speed. Their priorities, however, are noticeably different. Bunch offers more passenger seats and a polished premium ownership experience. Addmotor offers stronger performance, a larger battery, longer range, wider tires, and a substantially lower price. For many households, the E-325 therefore looks less like the budget alternative and more like the practical one. Bunch Original 4+ vs. Addmotor E-325 Specifications Category Addmotor E-325 Bunch Original 4+ Motor 750W rear hub, 1,400W peak 500W DAPU geared hub Maximum Torque 90Nm 45Nm Battery 48V 20Ah Samsung, 960Wh 48V 12.8Ah LG, 614Wh Claimed Range 60+ miles in PAS 1 20–30 miles Top Speed 20 mph 20 mph Total Payload 550 lbs 600 lbs Front Box Capacity 250 lbs 400 lbs Passenger Seats Two cushioned seats Four belted seats Tires 20 × 2.4 front / 24 × 3.0 rear 20 × 2.15 front / 24 × 2.0 rear Bike Weight Approximately 198 lbs 168 lbs Listed Price $3,699 $6,499 The current manufacturer listings confirm the major differences in battery size, motor output, seating capacity, range, payload, and price. How Many Passenger Seats Do You Really Need? The clearest advantage of the Bunch Original 4+ is its four-seat passenger box. It includes front and rear benches with four three-point seat belts, while its cargo area is rated for up to 400 pounds. Families that regularly transport three or four children may find this layout difficult to replace. The E-325 has two cushioned passenger seats and two seat belts. Its front box is rated for 250 pounds, while its overall payload limit is 550 pounds. That is below the Bunch bike’s 600-pound total rating, but it remains substantial for ordinary family use. The practical question is not which trike has the highest theoretical capacity. It is how many seats will actually be used every week. A family with one or two children gains little from paying for four positions. The E-325’s 36-inch-long, 25-inch-wide, and 23-inch-high box still provides generous room for children, pets, shopping bags, and daily supplies. Bunch is the logical choice when four seats are essential. For households carrying one child, two children, or a mixture of passengers and cargo, the E-325 offers the more balanced layout. More Motor Reserve for Real Loads Cargo trikes become demanding when starting from a stop, climbing a hill, or moving through an intersection with a loaded box. A motor that feels adequate during an empty test ride can feel far weaker after passengers and groceries are added. The Bunch Original 4+ uses a 500W motor producing 45Nm of torque. The Addmotor E-325 uses a 750W rear-mounted motor rated for up to 1,400W peak output and 90Nm of torque. That gives the Addmotor twice the stated torque. Because both trikes are limited to 20 mph, the stronger E-325 motor is not mainly about chasing speed. Its real benefit is additional reserve at lower speeds. More torque can make loaded starts feel less strained, reduce rider effort on inclines, and help maintain momentum in stop-and-go traffic. This matters in hilly neighborhoods and suburban areas where destinations are farther apart. A family cargo trike is already a heavy machine before anyone climbs aboard. Choosing the stronger drive system leaves more room for passengers and cargo without making the trike feel immediately overwhelmed. A Larger Battery Makes Daily Use Easier The Bunch Original 4+ has a 614Wh battery and a published range of 20 to 30 miles depending on terrain and load. The E-325 uses a 960Wh Samsung battery and is rated for more than 60 miles under PAS 1 conditions. Real-world range will vary with passenger weight, hills, weather, throttle use, speed, tire pressure, and assist level. Even so, battery capacity is objective: the E-325 stores approximately 56 percent more energy. That extra capacity matters even when the rider never attempts a 60-mile journey. It may allow several school runs and errands between charges while providing more breathing room when plans change. A parent can add a grocery stop or park visit without immediately worrying about returning home with a nearly empty battery. The Bunch range may be sufficient for short neighborhood routines. The Addmotor battery is better suited to riders who want their cargo trike to replace more car trips and who do not want charging to become a daily obligation. Wider Tires for Imperfect Neighborhood Roads The E-325 uses 20 × 2.4-inch front tires and a 24 × 3.0-inch rear tire. The Bunch Original 4+ uses 20 × 2.15-inch front tires and a 24 × 2.0-inch rear tire. Wider tires can add cushioning and create a larger contact area on imperfect pavement. They will not turn the E-325 into an off-road vehicle, but they can make cracks, patched asphalt, driveway transitions, and rough neighborhood streets feel less harsh. The wider rear tire also suits the stronger rear-mounted motor and the weight carried through the back of the trike. Both models use hydraulic disc brakes and include parking brakes. Addmotor specifies 180mm brake rotors on all three wheels. The E-325 also combines a mid-axis torque sensor with seven pedal-assist levels, allowing the motor response to feel more natural and controllable while carrying passengers. These are not glamorous features, but they affect nearly every journey. Parents need predictable braking when approaching intersections, while a parking brake helps prevent a loaded trike from rolling as children enter or leave the cargo box. The Price Difference Is Difficult to Ignore The Bunch Original 4+ is currently listed at $6,499, while the Addmotor E-325 is listed at $3,699. That creates a price difference of $2,800. Bunch partly justifies its premium with four-passenger seating, full UL 2271 and UL 2849 compliance, fully assembled delivery, and a strong family-cargo service model. Buyers who specifically need those benefits may accept the higher price. However, the E-325 does not exchange its lower price for entry-level hardware. It offers the stronger motor, twice the stated torque, a 960Wh Samsung battery, torque-sensing assistance, three-wheel hydraulic brakes, wider tires, a reinforced composite cargo box, and a two-year warranty. For a family that only needs two passenger seats, the Bunch premium becomes difficult to defend. The $2,800 difference could cover helmets, high-quality locks, weather equipment, maintenance, insurance, and accessories while still leaving money unspent. A premium cargo bike should provide benefits that match the buyer’s actual routine. Paying more for unused passenger seats does not improve the school run, increase range, or make a hill easier to climb. Which Cargo Trike Is Easier to Live With? The best family vehicle is not necessarily the one with the longest feature list. It is the one that removes the most inconvenience from everyday life. The E-325’s larger battery can reduce charging frequency. Its stronger motor provides greater assistance when the box is loaded. Its wider tires are appropriate for less-than-perfect streets, while its two-seat cargo area covers the needs of many small and medium-sized families. Bunch offers more seats, but Addmotor provides more performance in the areas riders will notice every day. Unless a household routinely transports more than two children, the E-325’s combination of range, power, cargo flexibility, and price is difficult to overlook. Final Verdict The Bunch Original 4+ remains a compelling specialist choice for families that regularly need four belted passenger positions. It also has a higher total payload rating, lower bike weight, and fully assembled delivery. For most other buyers, the Addmotor E-325 is the stronger overall value. It provides more motor power, twice the stated torque, a much larger battery, longer claimed range, wider tires, and a far lower purchase price. Its two-seat front box is sufficient for many families and remains useful for groceries, pets, work supplies, and weekend outings. Bunch wins the seating-capacity contest. Addmotor wins the broader comparison for power, range, flexibility, and cost. Unless four passenger seats are essential, the E-325 is the cargo trike that makes more sense for real family life.

    Bunch Electric Cargo Bike vs. Addmotor E-325: Which One Fits Real Family Life Better?

    August 1, 2026

    How to Get a Driver’s License in Miami Florida

    August 1, 2026
    "Spider-Man: Brand New Day," 2026

    “Spider-Man: Brand New Day” A More Mature, Emotional Spidey Adventure [Review]

    July 31, 2026

    LEGO Introduces SMART Play Gateways & Several New Sets at SDCC 2026

    July 23, 2026

    Jason Alexander Apologizes For ‘Inappropriate’ Underaged Courtney Stodden Sketch

    July 22, 2026

    Mara Wilson Shares Her Thoughts on a Potential “Matilda” Sequel

    July 21, 2026

    Tubi Indie Spotlight: “Blood and Breakfast” by Mark Byrne

    August 1, 2026
    "Spider-Man: Brand New Day," 2026

    “Spider-Man: Brand New Day” A More Mature, Emotional Spidey Adventure [Review]

    July 31, 2026

    Madeline Brewer, Emory Cohen, Nicholas Alexander Chavez Cast in “Possession” Reboot

    July 30, 2026

    Charles Parnell, Marta Kessler, Caleb Dolden Join Cast of “The Conjuring: First Communion”

    July 30, 2026

    “American Idol” Renewed, Showcases Network TV Issues

    July 30, 2026

    Ryan Murphy Says “American Horror Story” Season 13 Brings Together All Previous Seasons

    July 29, 2026

    Mike Flanagan’s “Carrie” Series Gets Release Date, Teaser Trailer

    July 27, 2026

    It’s a Good Time to be a “Stranger Things” Fan With 10th Anniversary Merch

    July 17, 2026
    "Spider-Man: Brand New Day," 2026

    “Spider-Man: Brand New Day” A More Mature, Emotional Spidey Adventure [Review]

    July 31, 2026

    “The Odyssey” A Flawed But Staggering Spectacle of Scale and Scope [review]

    July 17, 2026

    “Gail Daughtry and the Celebrity Sex Pass” Wizard of Oz Meets Screwball Sex Comedy

    July 10, 2026
    Jackass

    “Jackass: Best and Last” A Swan Song for Nut Taps [review]

    June 27, 2026
    Check Out Our Latest
      • Product Reviews
      • Reviews
      • SDCC 2021
      • SDCC 2022
    Related Posts

    None found

    NERDBOT
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    Nerdbot is owned and operated by Nerds! If you have an idea for a story or a cool project send us a holler on Editors@Nerdbot.com.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.